Use of focus groups with rural women of lower socioeconomic status

Applied Nursing Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 45-50

  Williams, Roma D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; POVERTY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; REPRODUCIBILITY; RURAL POPULATION; UNITED STATES;

ALABAMA; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; POVERTY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RURAL POPULATION; WOMEN;

EID: 0033072551     PISSN: 08971897     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0897-1897(99)80178-5     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Alabama Family Practice Rural Health Board. (1991). The road to rural health. Author.
2. Alcalay, R., Ghee, A., & Scrimshaw, S. (1993). Designing prenatal care messages for low-income Mexican women. Public Health Reports, 108, 354-362.
3. American Cancer Society. (1996). Cancer facts and figures. Atlanta, GA. Author.
4. Germain, C.P. (1993). Ethnography: The method. In P.L. Munhall & C. Oiler-Boyd (Eds). Nursing research: A qualitative perspective. National League for Nursing Press: New York. 237-268.
5. Wyatt, G., Kurtz, M.E., & Liken, M. (1993). Breast cancer survivors: An exploration of quality of life issues. Cancer Nursing, 16, 440-448.