Photic driving response in primary headache: Diagnostic value tested by discriminant analysis and artificial neural network classifiers

Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 23-28

  De Tommaso, M ^a   Sciruicchio, V ^a   Bellotti, R ^a   Guido, M ^a   Sasanelli, G ^a   Specchio, L M ^a   Puca, F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

Author keywords

Discriminant analysis; EEC; Headache; Photic driving response

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMAN; MALE; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; TENSION HEADACHE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FEMALE; FOURIER ANALYSIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIGRAINE WITHOUT AURA; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PHOTIC STIMULATION; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; TENSION-TYPE HEADACHE;

EID: 0033068670     PISSN: 03920461     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100720050006     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Gronset GS, Greenberg MK (1995) The utility of the electroencephalogram in the evaluation of patients presenting with headache: a review of the literature. Neurology 45:1263-1267
2. Puca FM, de Tommaso M, Savarese MA, Genco S, Prudenzano A (1992) Topographic analysis of steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) in the medium frequency range in migraine with and without aura. Cephalalgia 12:245-249
3. Genco S, de Tommaso M, Prudenzano A, Savarese MA, Puca FM (1994) EEG features in juvenile migraine: topographic analysis of spontaneous and visual evoked brain electrical activity: a comparison with adult migraine. Cephalalgia 14:42-46
4. Puca FM, de Tommaso M, Tola P, Sciruicchio V ( 1996) Photic driving in migraine: correlations with clinical features. Cephalalgia 16(4):246-250
5. de Tommaso M, Sciruicchio V, Bellotti R, Castellano M, Tola P, Megna M, Puca FM (1997) Discrimination between migraine patients and normal subjects based on steady state visual evoked potentials: discriminant analysis and artificial neural network classifiers. Funct Neurol 12(6):333-338
6. Baxt W (1995) Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet 346:1135-1138
7. Dayoff JE (1990) Neural network architectures: An introduction. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York
8. Hecht-Nielsen R (1990) Neurocomputing. Addison-Wesley, Reading
9. Litvan I, De Leo JM, Hauw JJ, Daniel SE, Jellinger K, Me Kee A, Dickson D, Horoupian DS, Lantos PL, Tabaton M ( 1996) What can artificial neural networks teach us about neurodegenerative disorders with extrapyramidal features'? Brain 119:831-839
10. Klöppel B (1994) Neural networks as a new method for EEG analysis. Neuropsychobiology 29:33-38
11. Anderer P, Saletu B, Klöppel B, Semlitsch HV, Werner H (1994) Discrimination between demented patients and nor-mais based on topographie EEG slow wave activity. Comparison between z statistics: discriminant analysis and artificial neural network classifiers. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 91:108-117
12. Headache Classification Committee of the Internation Headache Society (1988) Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgia and facial pain. Cephalalgia 8[Suppl 7]: 19-28
13. Tietjen GE (1996) The primary headache disorders - apple sauce or fruit cocktail? Cephalalgia 16(4):223
14. Schaffe H ( 1959) SAS-STAT guide. The analysis of variance. John Wiley & Sons, New York
15. Hertz J, Krogh A, Palmer RG ( 1991 ) Introduction to the theory of the neural computation. Addison-Wesley, New York pp 115-156
16. Rumelhart DE, Me Clelland JL (1986) Parallel distributed processing, vol 1. MIT, Cambridge
17. Ulett GA, Evans D, O'Leary JL (1952) Survey of 1,000 patients with chief complaint of headache. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 4:463-470
18. Morril B, Blanchard EB, Barron KD, Dentinger MP (1990) Neurological evaluation of chronic headache patients: is laboratory testing always necessary? Biofeedback Self Regul 15:27-35
19. Sargent JD, Solbach P (1983) Medical evaluation of migraneurs: review of the value of laboratory and radiological tests. Headache 23:62-65
20. Valdizan JR, Andreu C, Almarcegui C, Olivito A (1994) Quantitative EEG in children with headache. Headache 34 (l):53-55
21. Pothman R ( 1993) Topographic EEG mapping in childhood headaches. Cephalalgia 13:57-58
22. Pearce J (1996) Are the International Headache Society criteria for headache useful? Cephalalgia 16:289-292
23. Marcus DA (1992) Migraine and tension-type headaches: the questionable validity of current classification system. Clin J Pain 8:28-36
24. Spierings ELH (1995) Migraine. Questions and answers. Merit Publishing International, New York, pp 54-55
25. Regan D (1988) Human VEPs. In: Picton TW (ed) Handbook of electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, vol. 3. El se vier, Amsterdam New York Oxford, pp 159-243
26. Shoenen J, Wang W, Albert A, Delwaide PJ (1995) Potentiation instead of habituation characterized visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks. Eur J Neurol2:115-l22
27. Moskowitz MA, Macfarlane R (1993) Neurovascolar and molecular mechanisms in migraine headaches. Cerebrovascular Brain Metab Rev 5:159-177
28. Olesen J (1991) Clinical and pathophysiological observations in migraine and tension-type headache explained by integration of vascular, supraspinal and myofascial inputs. Pain 16:125-132