Responses of baccalaureate and graduate programs to the emergence of choice in nursing accreditation

Journal of Nursing Education

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 53-61

  Bellack, Janis P ^a   Gelmon, Sherril B ^b   O'Neil, Edward H ^c   Thomsen, Catherine L ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; NURSING EDUCATION; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

ACCREDITATION; DECISION MAKING, ORGANIZATIONAL; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033068304     PISSN: 00223158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (1996). Fact sheet: An alliance for accreditation of nursing higher education [On-line]. Available: http://www.aacn.nche.edu
2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (1997a). AACN moves to establish alliance to accredit nursing higher education [On-line]. Available: http://www.aacn.nche.edu
3. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (1997b). Draft standards for accreditation of baccalaureate and graduate nursing education programs [On-line]. Available: http://www.aacn. nche.edu
4. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (1997c). Procedures for accreditation of baccalaureate and graduate nursing education programs [On-line]. Available: http://www.aacn. nche.edu
5. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (1998a). Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education: January-February news [On-line]. Available: http://www.aacn.nche.edu
6. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (1998b). Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education: Interactive issues forum on accreditation [On-line]. Available: http:// www.aacn.nche.edu
7. Boyer, E. (1994). A classification of institutions of higher education. Pittsburgh, PA: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
8. Braham, C.G. (Ed.). (1995). Random House Webster's school and office dictionary. New York: Random House.
9. Gelmon, S.B. (1997). Intentional improvement: The deliberate linkage of assessment and accreditation. In Assessing impact: Evidence and action (pp. 51-65). Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.
10. National League for Nursing. (1996). Status report to the membership. New York: Author.
11. National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission. (1997a). 1997 criteria related to 1997 standards. New York: Author.
12. National League for Nursing Accrediting Commission. (1997b). 1997 accreditation manual for post-secondary, baccalaureate and higher degree programs in nursing. New York: Author.
13. O'Neil, E.H. (1993). Health professions education for the future: Schools in service to the nation. San Francisco: Pew Health Professions Commission.
14. O'Neil, E.H. (1997). Using accreditation for your purposes. AAHE Bulletin, 49(10), 10-13.
15. Pew Health Professions Commission. (1995). Critical challenges: Revitalizing the health professions for the twenty-first century. San Francisco: UCSF Center for the Health Professions.
16. Ruzek, J.Y., O'Neil, E.H., & Williard, R. (1996). Trends in U.S. funding for biomedical research. San Francisco: UCSF Center for the Health Professions.
17. Ryan, S.A. (1997). President's message: We still have much to do. Nursing and Health Care: Perspectives on Community, 18(2), 94-95.
18. Shugars, D.A., O'Neil, E.H., & Bader, J.D. (Eds.). (1991). Healthy America: Practitioners for 2005, An agenda for action for U.S. health professional schools. Durham, NC: The Pew Health Professions Commission.
19. Trombley, W. (1998). Performance-based budgeting. National CrossTalk, 6(1), 1, 14-16.