Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. I: Analytical methods

Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 26-37

  Stewart, Jonathan P ^a,c   Fenves, Gregory L ^b,c   Seed, Raymond B ^b,c  

^a University of California   (United States)

^b Berkeley   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEISMIC STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

BUILDINGS; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); SEISMOLOGY; SOILS; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 0033067334     PISSN: 10900241     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:1(26)     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (1978). "Tentative provisions for the development of seismic regulations for buildings: A cooperative effort with the design profession, building code interests, and the research community." Rep. No. ATC 3-06, U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC.
2. Apsel, R. J., and Luco, J. E. (1987). "Impedance functions for foundations embedded in a layered medium: An integral equation approach." J. Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 15(2), 213-231.
3. Aviles, J., and Perez-Rocha, L. E. (1996). "Evaluation of interaction effects on the system period and the system damping due to foundation embedment and layer depth." Soil Dyn. and Earthquake Engrg., 15(1), 11-27.
4. Bielak, J. (1975). "Dynamic behavior of structures with embedded foundations." J. Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 3(3), 259-274.
5. Boore, D. M., and Brown, L. T. (1998). "Comparing shear-wave velocity profiles from inversion of surface-wave velocities with downhole measurements: Systematic differences between the CXW method and downhole measurements at six USC strong motion sites." Seism. Res. Letters. 69(3), 222-229.
6. Building Seismic Safety Council (BSSC). (1997). "NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings. Part 1, Provisions and Part 2, Commentary. Rep. No. FEMA 302 and 303, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
7. Dobry, R., and Gazetas, G. (1986). "Dynamic response of arbitrarily shaped foundations." J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 112(2), 109-135.
8. Duke, C. M., and Leeds, D. J. (1962). "Site characteristics of southern California strong motion earthquake stations." Rep. No. 62-55, Dept. of Engrg., Univ. of California, Los Angeles, Calif.
9. Elsabee, F., and Morray, J. P. (1977). "Dynamic behavior of embedded foundations." Rep. No. R77-33, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
10. Fenves, G. L., and DesRoches, R. (1994). "Response of the northwest connector in the Landers and Big Bear Earthquakes." Rep. No. UCB/ EERC-94/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.
11. Gohl, W. B. (1993). "Response of pile foundations to earthquake shaking - general aspects of behavior and design methodologies." Proc., Seismic Soil/Struct. Interaction Seminar, Vancouver.
12. Iguchi, M., and Luco, J. E. (1982). "Vibration of flexible plate on viscoelastic medium." J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 108(6), 1103-1120.
13. Kausel, E. (1974). "Forced vibrations of circular foundations on layered media." Rep. No. R74-11, Dept. of Civ. Engrg., MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
14. Liou, G.-S., and Huang, P.-H. (1994). "Effect of flexibility on impedance functions for circular foundations." J. Engrg. Mech., ASCE, 120(7), 1429-1446.
15. Ljung, L. (1987). System identification: Theory for the user. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
16. Ljung, L. (1995). System identification toolbox, users guide. The Math Works, Inc., Natick, Mass.
17. Luco, J. E. (1980). "Linear soil-structure interaction." Soil-structure interaction: The status of current analysis methods and research, J. J. Johnson, ed., Rep. No. NUREG/CR-1780 and UCRL-53011, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. and Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Livermore, Calif.
18. Novak, M. (1991). "Piles under dynamic loads." Proc., 2nd Int. Conf. on Recent Advances in Geotech. Engrg. and Soil Dyn., Univ. of Miss.-Rolla, Rolla, Mo., 2433-2456.
19. Pandit, S. M. (1991). Modal and spectrum analysis. Wiley, New York.
20. Riggs, H. R., and Waas, G. (1985). "Influence of foundation flexibility on soil-structure interaction." J. Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 13(5), 597-615.
21. Rodriguez-Ordonez, J. A. (1994). "A new method for interpretation of surface wave measurements in soils," PhD dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, N.C.
22. Roesset, J. M. (1980). "A review of soil-structure interaction." Soil-structure interaction: The status of current analysis methods and research, J. J. Johnson, ed., Rep. No. NUREG/CR-1780 and UCRL-53011, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. and Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Washington, D.C.
23. Safak, E. (1991a). "Identification of linear structures using discrete-time filters." J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 117(10), 3064-3085.
24. Safak, E. (1991b). "Adaptive modeling, identification, and control of dynamic structural systems. I: Theory." J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE. 115(11), 2386-2405.
25. Schnabel, P. B., Lysmer, J., and Seed, H. B. (1972). "SHAKE: A computer program for earthquake response analysis of horizontally layered soil deposits." Rep. No. UCB/EERC-72/12, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California.
26. Seed, R. B., Dickenson, S. E., and Mok, C. M. (1992). "Recent lessons regarding seismic response analyses of soft and deep clay sites." Proc., Seminar on Seismic Des. and retrofit of bridges, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif., and Div. of Structures, California Dept. of Transportation, Sacramento, Calif., 18-39.
27. Seed, H. B., Romo, M. P., Sun, J. I., Jaime, A., and Lysmer, J. (1988). "The Mexico Earthquake of September 19, 1985 - relationships between soil conditions and earthquake ground motions." Earthquake Spectra, 4(4), 687-729.
28. Stewart, J. P., and Fenves, G. L. (1998). "System identification for evaluating soil-structure interaction effects in buildings from strong motion recordings." J. Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 27, 869-885.
29. Stewart, J. P., Seed, R. B., and Fenves, G. L. (1999). "Seismic soil-structure interaction in buildings. II: Empirical results." J. Geotech. Engrg., ASCE, 125(1), 38-48.
30. Stewart, J. P., and Stewart, A. F. (1997). "Analysis of soil-structure interaction effects on building response from earthquake strong motion recordings at 58 sites. Rep. No. UCB/EERC-97/01, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif., 742.
31. Todorovska, M. I. (1996). "Second Preliminary Release Of Records Of The Northridge Earthquake (17 January, 1994) At Stations Of The Los Angeles Strong Motion Network," Univ. of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif.
32. Uniform building code, 1997 edition. (1997). International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, Calif.
33. Veletsos, A. S., and Meek, J. W. (1974). "Dynamic behavior of building-foundation systems." J. Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 3(2), 121-138.
34. Veletsos, A. S., and Nair, V. V. (1975). "Seismic interaction of structures on hysteretic foundations." J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 101(1), 109-129.
35. Veletsos, A. S., and Verbic, B. (1973). "Vibration of viscoelastic foundations." J. Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., 2(1), 87-102.
36. Veletsos. A. S., and Wei, Y. T. (1971). "Lateral and rocking vibrations of footings." J. Soil Mech. and Found. Div., ASCE, 97(9), 1227-1248.