Test-retest reliability of the ulnar F-wave minimum latency in normal adults

Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 195-200

  Gill III, N W ^a   Ruediger, T M ^a   Gochis, R D ^a   Werling, W C ^a   Moore, J H ^a,b   Allison, S C ^a   Shaffer, S ^a   Underwood, F B ^a  

^a BAYLOR UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AMEDD Center and School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARM; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DEVICE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MUSCLE ACTION POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; RELIABILITY; ULNAR ARTERY;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; NEURAL CONDUCTION; REACTION TIME; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ULNAR NERVE;

EID: 0033066856     PISSN: 0301150X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. BARRON, S. A., MAZLIAH, J. and BENAL, E.: The minimum F-response latency: results of stimuli of normal ulnar nerves. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 27: 499-501, 1987.
2. DAS, K. B., TALY, A. B., GUPTA, S. I., SURESH, T. G. and RAO, S.: Acute inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy: a critical evaluation of diagnostic criteria for demyelination. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 35: 451-5, 1995.
3. FIERRO, B., RAIMONDO, D. and MODICA, A.: F-wave study at different stimulation rates in upper motoneurone lesions. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 33: 27-31, 1993.
4. FISHER, M. A., AAEM mmimograph #13: H reflexes and F-waves: physiology and clinical indications. Muscle Nerve, 15: 1223-1233, 1992.
5. FISHER, M. A.: F-response latency determination. Muscle Nerve, 5: 730-734, 1982.
6. FISHER, M. A., HOFFEN, B. and HULTMAN, C.: Normative F-wave values and the number of recorded F-waves. Muscle Nerve. 17: 1185-1189, 1994.
7. FRASER, J. L. and OLNEY, R. K.: The relative diagnostic sensitivity of different F-wave parameters in various polyneuropathies. Muscle Nerve, 15: 912-918, 1992.
8. JOHNSON, E. W.: Practical Electromyography. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1988.
9. KRAFT, G. H.: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation: Clinics of North America. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, 1990.
10. LIVESON, J. A. and MA, D. M.: Laboratory Reference for Clinical Neurophysiology. F. A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, 1992.
11. MARRA, T. R.: F-wave measurements: a comparison of various recording techniques in health and peripheral nerve disease. Electromyogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 27: 33-37, 1987.
12. OH, S. J.: Clinical Electromyography: Nerve Conduction Studies. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1993.
13. OLNEY, R. K. and AMINOFF, M. J.: Electrodiagnostic features of the Guillain-Barré syndrome: the relative sensitivity of different techniques. Neurology, 40: 471-475, 1990.
14. PORTNEY, L. G. and WATKINS, M. P.: Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. Appleton and Lange, Norwalk, 1993.
15. ROTHSTEIN, J. M. and ECHTERNACH, J. L.: Primer on Measurement: An Introductory Guide to Measurement Issues. American Physical Therapy Association, Alexandria, 1993.
16. TANIGUCHI, M. H., HAYES, J. and RODRIGUEZ, A. R.: Reliability determination of F-mean response latency. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., 74: 1139-1143, 1993.
17. ZAPPIA, M., VALENTINO, P., MARCHELLO, L. P., PANICCIA, M. and MONTAGNA, P.: F-wave normative studies in different nerves of healthy subjects. Electroencephogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 89: 67-72, 1993.