Impairment of visual recognition after a traumatic brain injury;Evolution des troubles de la reconnaissance visuelle a distance d'un traumatisme cerebral

Revue Neurologique

Volumn 155, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 375-382

  Pradat Diehl, P ^a   Masure, M C ^b   Lauriot Prevost, M C ^a   Vallat, C ^a   Bergego, C ^a  

^a PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

^b SERVICE HOSPITALIER FRÉDÉRIC JOLIOT   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CASE REPORT; CEREBRAL BLINDNESS; HUMAN; MALE; PROSOPAGNOSIA; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL IMPAIRMENT; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL NERVOUS SYSTEM;

ADULT; AGNOSIA; BRAIN INJURIES; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY DISORDERS; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS; TRAUMA SEVERITY INDICES; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033065129     PISSN: 00353787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BARON J.C. (1987). Couplage local entre perfusion et métabolisme énergétique au cours des accidents ischémiques cérébraux récents chez l'homme : étude par la tomographie à positons. Agressologie, 28 : 201-204.
2. BELIN P., VAN EECKHOUT P., ZILBOVICIUS M., REMY P., FRANCOIS C., GUILLAUME S., CHAIN F., RANCUREL G., & SAMSON Y. (1996). Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy. A PET study. Neurology, 47: 1504-1511.
3. BENTON A.L., HAMSHER K., VARNEY N.R., SPREEN O. (1983). Contributions to neuropsychological assessment. A clinical manual. Oxford University Press.
4. BERGEGO C., PRADAT-DIEHL P., DELOCHE G. & LAURIOT-PREVOST M.C. (1989). La reconnaissance des formes et des objets : données récentes en psychologie expérimentale et cognitive, intérêt dans la compréhension des agnosies visuelles. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, 32 : 563-583.
5. BERGEGO C., P. PRADAT-DIEHL P., MASURE M.C. (1995). Les troubles neurovisuels post-traumatiques. In Bergego C., Azouvi P. Eds : Neuropsychologie des traumatismes crâniens graves de l'adulte, Éditions Frison Roche, Paris, 205-219.
6. BRUCE V., YOUNG A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. Br J Psychol, 77: 305-327.
7. DAMASIO H., & DAMASIO A.R. (1989). Lesion analysis in neuropsychology. Oxford University Press.
8. DUCARNE B., BERGEGO C. BARBEAU M. (1981). Étude sémiologique de la restauration de la fonction visuelle dans deux cas de cécité occipitale post-anoxique. Rev Neurol, 137 : 741-784.
9. FYTCHE D.H., GUY C.N., ZEKI S. (1995). The parallel visual motion inputs into area V1 and V5 of human cerebral cortex, Brain, 118 (Pt 6): 1375-1394.
10. GIRARD P. (1994). Bases anatomophysiologiques de la vision résiduelle après lésion du l'aire visuelle primaire. Rev Neurol, 151 : 457-465.
11. GOLDENBERG G., ARTNER C. (1991). Visual imagery and knowledge about the visual appareance of objects in patients with posterior cerebral artery lesions. Brain and Cognition, 15: 160-186.
12. HUMPHREYS G.W. & RIDDOCH M.J. (1987a). To see but not to see: a case study of visual agnosia. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London, 34.
13. HUMPHREYS G.W. & RIDDOCH M.J. (1987b). The fractionation of visual agnosia in visual object processing: a cognitive neuropsychological approach. In: Humphreys, G.W. Riddoch M.J.eds. Visual object processing: a cognitive neuropsychological approach, p 281-306. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
14. HUMPHREYS G.W., RIDDOCH M.J. (1994). Visual object processing in normality and pathology: implications for rehabilitation. In: Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W. eds. Cognitive Neuropsychology and Cognitive Rehabilitation, p 39-76. LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES London.
15. Kasten, E., SABEL B.A. (1995). Visual field unlargement after computer training in brain-damaged patients with homonymous deficits: an open pilot trial. Restorative Neurology and Neurosciences, 8: 113-127.
16. KERKHOFF G., MÜNBINGER U. & MEIER E.K. (1994). Neurovisual rehabilitation in cerebral blindness. Arch Neurol, 51: 474-481.
17. METZ-LUTZ M.N., KREMIN H., DELOCHE G., HANNEQUIN D. (1991). Standardisation d'un test de dénomination orale : contrôle des effets de l'âge, du sexe, du niveau de scolarité chez les sujets normaux. Rev Neuropsychologie, 1 : 73-75.
18. NAVON D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedents of global texture in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9: 353-385.
19. OTTO I., GRANDGUILLAUME P., BOUTKHIL L., BURNOD Y. & GUIGON E. (1992). Direct and indirect cooperation between temporal and parietal networks for invariant recognition. J Cognitive Neuro-sciences, 4: 35-57.
20. PRADAT-DIEHL P., BERGEGO C., LAURIOT-PREVOST M.C., PASQUIER F., PERRIGOT M. (1991). Étude des troubles visuels consécutifs à un traumatisme crânio-cérébral. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, 24 : 449-456.
21. RIDDOCH M.J. & HUMPHREYS G.W. (1993). Birmingham object recognition battery (BORB). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
22. SCHNEIDER G. (1969). Two visual systems. Science, 163: 895-902.
23. SEKI K., TAJIMAT M. & SUGISHITA M. (1995). The efficacy of kinesthetic reading treatment for pure alexia. Neuropsychologia, 33: 595-609.
24. SNODGRASS J.G. & VANDERWART M.A. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreements, familiarity and visual complexity. Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 8: 174-215.
25. SPARR S.A., JAY M., DRISLANE F.W. & VENNA N. (1991). A historic case of visual agnosia revisited after forty years, Brain, 114: 789-800.
26. THURSTONE L.L. (1959). Test des formes identiques. Éditions du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée, Paris.
27. WILSON B.A. & DAVIDOFF J. (1993). Partial recovery from visual object agnosia: a ten year follow up study. Cortex, 29: 529-542.
28. ZIHL J. & VAN CRAMON D. (1985). Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with post-geniculate damage. Brain, 108: 335-365.