Pupillographic findings in neglect

Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 82-85

  Kim, Manho ^a,b   Schwartz, Ronald L ^c   Heilman, Kenneth M ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Arousal; Attention; Neglect; Pupil

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AROUSAL; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUPIL; PUPILLOGRAPHY; SENSORY NEUROPATHY;

EID: 0033063463     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp.67.1.82     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Heilman KM, Watson RT, Valenstein E. Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, eds. Clinical muropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1993:279-336.
2. Heilman KM. Neglect and related disorders. In: Heilman KM, Valenstein E, eds. Clinical neuropsychology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1979:268-307.
3. Watson RT, Valenstein E, Heilman KM. Thalamic neglect; the possible role of the medial thalamus and nucleus reticularis thalami in behavior. Arch Neurol 1981;38:501-7.
4. Mesulam MM. A cortical network for directed attention and unilateral neglect. Ann Neurol 1981;10:309-25.
5. Kinsbourne M. Direction of gaze and distribution of cerebral thought processes. Neuropsychologia 1974;12:270-81.
6. Posner MI, Walker J, Friedrich FJ, et al. Effects of parietal lobe injury on covert orienting of visual attention. J Neurosci 1984;4:163-87.
7. Mark VW, Kooistra CA, Heilman KM. Hemispatial neglect affected by non-neglected stimuli. Neurology 1988;38: 1207-11.
8. Riddoch MJ, Humphreys G. The effect of cuing on unilateral neglect. Neuropsychologia 1983;21:589-99.
9. Watson RT, Miller BD, Heilman KM. Evoked potential in neglect. Arch Neurol 1977;34:224-7.
10. Fiorelli M, Blin J, Bakchine S, et al. PET studies of cortical diaschisic in patients with motor hemi-neglect. J Neurol Sci 1991;104:135-42.
11. Vallar G, Bottini G, Sterzi R, et al. Hemianesthesia, sensory neglect, and defective access to conscious experience. Neurology 1991;41:650-2.
12. Bradshaw JL. Pupil size as a measure of arousal during information processing. Nature 1967;216:515-16.
13. Kim M, Barrett A, Heilman KM. Lateral asymmetries of pupillary response. Cortex 1998;34:753-62.
14. Wurtz RH, Goldberg ME, Robinson DL. Behavioural modulation of visual responses in the monkey: stimulus selection for attention and movement. In: Sprague JM, Epstein AN, eds. Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology. New York: Academic, 1980:9:43-83.
15. Heilman KM, Schwartz HD, Watson RT. Hypoarousal in patients with neglect syndrome and emotional indifference. Neurology 1978;28:229-32.
16. Schrandt NJ, Tranel D, Damasio H. The effects of total cerebral lesions on skin conductance response to signal stimuli. Neurology 1989;39(suppl 1):223.
17. Yokoyama K, Jennings R, Ackles P, et al. Lack of heart rate changes during an attention demanding task after right hemisphere lesions. Neurology 1987;37:624-30.