Cotton regrowth and recovery from early season leaf loss

Environmental and Experimental Botany

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 67-73

  Longer, D E ^a   Oosterhuis, D M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Defoliation; Gossypium hirsutum; Leaf area; Lint yield; Plant height; Seedling

Indexed keywords

COTTON; DEFOLIATION; PLANT GROWTH; STRESS TOLERANCE;

CROP PLANT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; LEAF; REGROWTH; YIELD RESPONSE;

EID: 0033061917     PISSN: 00988472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-8472(98)00050-1     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Anderson C., Frost I. Growth of Quercus robur seedlings after experimental grazing and cotyledon removal. Acta. Bot. Neerl. 45(1):1996;85-94.
2. Begum A., Eden W.G. Influence of defoliation on yield and quality of soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol. 58:1965;591-592.
3. Burmood D.T., Fehr W.R. Variety and row spacing effects on recoverability of soybeans from simulated hail injury. Agron. J. 65:1973;301-303.
4. Elsner J.E., Smith C.W., Owen D.F. Uniform stage description in upland cotton. Crop Sci. 19:1979;361-363.
5. Fehr W.R., Caviness C.E., Vorst J.J. Response of indeterminate and determinate soybean cultivars to defoliation and half-plant cutoff. Crop Sci. 17:1977;913-917.
6. Hayes J.J., Williams E.D. Effects of timing and intensity of defoliation on growth and development of white clover seedlings. Grass and Forage. 50:1995;414-423.
7. Hoagland, D.R., Arnon, D.I., 1938. University of California Agric. Exp. Sta. Circular #347.
8. Kalton, R.R., Weber, C.R., Eldridge, J.C., 1949. The effect of injury simulating hail damage to soybeans, Iowa Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 359.
9. Kerby T.A., Keeley M. Cotton seedlings can withstand some early leaf loss. Calif. Agric. 41(1/2):1987;18-19.
10. Lim W.H.L., Turner I.M. Resource availability and growth responses to defoliation in seedlings of three early-successional, tropical, woody species. Ecol. Res. 11:1996;321-324.
11. Longer, D.E., Oosterhuis, D.M., Withrow, M., 1993a. The influence of leaf removal at various stages of cotton seedling development. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana. National Cotton Council, Memphis, TN, p. 631.
12. Longer D.E., Oosterhuis D.M., Withrow M. Cotton seedling recovery from partial and complete defoliation. Ark. Farm Res. 42(6):1993;10-11.
13. SAS Institute, 1988. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute, Gary, NC.
14. Smith C.W. Research on simulated hail damage to cotton in Arkansas. Ark. Farm Res. 44(3):1978;5.
15. Smith C.W., Varvil J.J. Recoverability of cotton following simulated hail damage. Agron. J. 75:1981;597-600.
16. Smith C.W., Varvil J.J. Differential recovery among cotton genotypes following early-season defoliation. Crop Sci. 24:1983;151-153.
17. Teigen J.B., Vorst J.J. Soybean response to stand reduction and defoliation. Agron. J. 67:1975;813-816.
18. Turnipseed S.G. Response of soybeans to foliage losses and South Carolina. J. Econ. Entomol. 65:1972;244-299.
19. Weber C.R. Effects of defoliation and topping simulating hail injury to soybeans. Agron. J. 47:1955;262-266.
20. Williams, Livy III, Schotzko, D.J., O'Keeffe, L.E.O., 1995. Pea leaf weevil herbivory on pea seedlings: Effects on growth response and yield. Exp. Appl. Etomol. 76, 255-269.