Static three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 873, Issue , 1999, Pages 472-481

  Vauhkonen, Päivi J ^a   Vauhkonen, Marko ^a   Savolainen, Tuomo ^a   Kaipio, Jari P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALCULATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE; IMAGING;

EID: 0033061396     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09496.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. 1. Webster, J. 1990. Electrical Impedance Tomography. Adam Hilger. Bristol.
2. 2. Wexler, A. 1988. Electrical impedance imaging in two and three dimensions. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 9(suppl. A): 29-33.
3. 3. Goble, J., M. Cheney & D. Isaacson. 1992. Electrical impedance tomography in three dimensions. Appl. Comput. Electromagn. Soc. J. 7: 128-147.
4. 4. Metherall, P., D. Barber & R. Smallwood. 1995. Three dimensional electrical impedance tomography. In Proc. IX Int. Conf. Electrical Bio-Impedance, Heidelberg, Germany, p. 510-511.
5. 5. Metherall, P., D. Barber, R. Smallwood & B. Brown. 1996. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography. Nature 380: 509-512.
6. 6. Metherall, P., R. Smallwood & D. Barber. 1996. Three dimensional electrical impedance tomography of the human thorax. In Proc. 18th Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.
7. 7. Morucci, J., M. Granie, M. Lei, M. Chabert & P. Marsili. 1995. 3D reconstruction in electrical impedance imaging using a direct sensitivity matrix approach. Physiol. Meas. 16: A123-A128.
8. 8. Groetsch, C.W. 1993. Inverse Problems in the Mathematical Sciences. Vieweg. Braunschweig.
9. 9. Cheng, K-S., D. Isaacson, J. Newell & D. Gisser. 1989. Electrode models for electric current computed tomography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36: 918-924.
10. 10. Somersalo, E., M. Cheney & D. Isaacson. 1992. Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52: 1023-1040.
11. 11. Paulson, K., W. Breckon & M. Pidcock. 1992. Electrode modelling in electrical impedance tomography. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 52: 1012-1022.
12. 12. Hua, P., E. Woo, J. Webster & W. Tompkins. 1993. Finite element modeling of electrode-skin contact impedance in electrical impedance tomography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40: 335-343.
13. 13. Vauhkonen, P., M. Vauhkonen, T. Savolainen & J. Kaipio. 1997. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography based on the complete electrode model. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. In press.
14. 14. Yorkey, T. & J. Webster. 1987. A comparison of impedance tomographic reconstruction algorithms. Clin. Phys. Physiol. Meas. 8(suppl. A): 55-62.
15. 15. Dobson, D. & F. Santosa. 1994. An image enhancement technique for electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Probl. 10: 317-334.
16. 16. Kolehmainen, V., E. Somersalo, P. Vauhkonen, M. Vauhkonen & J. Kaipio. 1998. A Bayesian approach and total variation priors in 3D electrical impedance tomography. In IEEE EMBS '98, p. 1028-1031.
17. 17. Kolehmainen, V., M. Vauhkonen, P. Karjalainen & J. Kaipio. 1997. Spatial inhomogeneity and regularization in EIT. In Proc. 19th Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Chicago, p. 449-452.
18. 18. Jarvenpaä, S. 1995. A finite element model for the inverse conductivity problem. Philos. Lic. thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland.
19. 19. Korjenevsky, A. 1995. Reconstruction of absolute conductivity distribution in electrical impedance tomography. In Proc. IX Int. Conf. Electrical Bio-Impedance, Heidelberg, Germany, p. 532-535.
20. 20. Savolainen, T., J. Kaipio, M. Vauhkonen & P. Karjalainen. 1996. An EIT measurement system for experimental use. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 67: 3605-3609.