How is a grating detected on a narrowband noise masker?

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1133-1142

  Nachmias, Jacob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Detection; Discrimination; Grating; Masking; Noise

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; GRATING; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL MASKING; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; WAVEFORM;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0033061155     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00166-7     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Akutsu H., Ledge G.E. Discrimination of compound gratings: spatial-frequency channels or local features. Vision Research. 35:1995;2685-2695.
2. Anderson P.A., Movshon J.A. Binocular combination of contrast signals. Vision Research. 29:1989;1132-1155.
3. Badcock D.R. Spatial phase or luminance profile discrimination. Vision Research. 24:1984;613-623.
4. Blake R., Holopigian K. Orientation selectivity in cats and humans assessed by masking. Vision Research. 25:1985;1459-1467.
5. Burgess A. Visual signal detection. III. On Baysean use of prior knowledge and cross correlation. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A2:1985;1498-1507.
6. Field D.J., Nachmias J. Phase reversal discrimination. Vision Research. 24:1984;333-340.
7. Gilkey R.H. Spectral and temporal comparisons in auditory masking. Yost W.A., Watson C.S. Auditory processing of complex sounds. 1987;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
8. Graham N.V.S. Visual pattern analyzers. 1989;Oxford Science, Oxford.
9. Green D.M. Profile analysis: auditory intensity discrimination. 1988;Oxford Science, Oxford.
10. Green D.M., Swets J.A. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. 1966;Krieger, Huntington.
11. Henning G.B. Journal of the Optical Society of America. A5:1988;1362-1373.
12. Henning G.B., Hertz B.G., Hinton J.L. Effects of different hypothetical detection mechanisms on the shape of spatial frequency filters inferred from masking experiments: I. Noise masks. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 71:1981;574-581.
13. Kersten D. Statistical efficiency for the detection of visual noise. Vision Research. 27:1987;1029-1040.
14. Legge G.E., Cohen M.A., Stromeyer C.F. Spatial frequency masking with briefly pulsed patterns. Perception. 2:1978;161-166.
15. Nachmias J. Masked detection of gratings: the standard model revisited. Vision Research. 33:1993;1359-1365.
16. Nachmias J., Rogowitz B.E. Masking by spatially modulated gratings. Vision Research. 23:1983;1621-1629.
17. Richards V.M. The detectability of a tone added to narrowbands of equal-energy noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 91:1992;3424-3435.
18. Richards V.M.D. Experiments related to the detection of a tone masked by another tone. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 95:1994;3481-3496.
19. Richards V.M.D., Heller L.M., Green D.M. The detection of a tone added to narrowbands of noise: the energy model revisited. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 43A:1991;481-501.
20. Watson A.B. Probability summation over time. Vision Research. 19:1979;515-522.