Determination of acute noise effects using distortion product otoacoustic emissions

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 67-76

  Delb, Wolfgang ^a   Hoppe, Ulrich ^a   Liebel, Jörg ^a   Iro, Heinrich ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions; Noise induced hearing loss; ROC curve

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOGRAPHY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NOISE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, NOISE-INDUCED; HUMANS; MALE; NOISE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0033061060     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/010503999424789     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bonfils P, Avan P, Elbez M, Deys S, Erminy M, Francois M. Auditory threshold evaluation by distortion-product oto-acoustic emissions using decision support system. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1994;114: 360-5.
2. Brown AM, Gaskill SA. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;88:840-9.
3. Chang KW, Norton SJ. The effects of continuous versus interrupted noise exposures on distortion product otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs. Hear Res 1996; 96:1-12.
4. Clark WW, Bohne BA. Animal model of the 4-kHz tonal dip in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1978;87 (Suppl):1-16.
5. Dallos P, Harris D. Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. J Neurophysiol 1978;41:365-83.
6. Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear Res 1983;9:79-90.
7. Davis RI, Hamernik RP, Ahroon WA. Frequency selectivity in noise-damaged cochleas. Audiology 1993;32:110-31.
8. Dolan TG, Abbas PJ. Short-term effects of sound exposure on the 2f1-f2 acoustic emission. J Acoust Soc Am 1985;77:1614-6.
9. Eicken Cv. Experimentelle akustische Schädigung des Labyrinths bei normaler und defekter Gehörknöchelchenkette. Verh Dtsch Otol Gesellsch 1909;144.
10. Engdahl B, Kemp DT. The effect of noise exposure on the details of distortion product otoacoustic emissions in humans. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;99:1573-87.
11. Gold T. Hearing II: The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond 1948;135:492-8.
12. Hanley JA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1989;29.307-35.
13. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
14. Harris FP, Lonsbury Martin BL, Stagner BB, Coats AC, Martin GK. Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. J Acoust Soc Am 1989;85:220-9.
15. Harrison RV, Evans EF. The effects of hair cell loss (restricted to outer hair cells) on the threshold and tuning properties of cochlear fibres in the guinea pig. In: Portmann M, Aran JM, eds. Inner ear biolosy. Paris: INSERM 1977;105-24.
16. Hauser R, Probst R. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1991;89:280-6.
17. Hotz MA, Probst R, Harris FP, Hauser R. Monitoring the effects of noise exposure using transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993;113:478-82.
18. Ising H. Soziakusis. In: Dieroff H-G, ed. Lärmschwerhörigkeit. 3. Auflaqe ed. Jena: Gustav Fischer Verlag, 1994;198-208.
19. Johnstone BM, Patuzzi R, Yates GK. Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave. Hear Res 1986;22:147-53.
20. Kim DO, Paparello J, Jung MD, Smurzynski J, Sun X. Distortion product otoacoustic emission test of sensorineural hearing loss: performance regarding sensitivity, specificity and receiver operating characteristics. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116:3-11.
21. Kvaerner KJ, Engdahl B, Arnesen AR, Mair IW. Temporary threshold shift and otoacoustic emissions after industrial noise exposure. Scand Audiol 1995;24:137-41.
22. Liebel J, Delb W, Andes C, Koch A. Die Erfassung von Lärmschaden bei Besuchern einer Diskothek mit Hilfe der TEOAE und DPOAE. Laryngorhinootologie 1996; 75:259-64.
23. Metz CE. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-98.
24. Nielsen LH, Popelka GR, Rasmussen AN, Osterhammel PA. Clinical significance of probe-tone frequency ratio on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Scand Audiol 1993;22:159-64.
25. Norton SJ, Mott JB, Champlin CA. Behavior of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions following intense ipsilateral acoustic stimulation. Hear Res 1989;38:243-58.
26. Schmiedt RA. Acoustic distortion in the ear canal. I. Cubic difference tones: effects of acute noise injury. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;79:1481-90.
27. Siegel JH, Kim DO, Molnar CE. Effects of altering organ of Corti on cochlear distortion products f2-f1 and 2f1-f2. J Neurophysiol 1982;47:303-28.
28. Skellett RA, Crist JR, Fallon M, Bobbin RP. Chronic low-level noise exposure alters distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1996;98:68-76.
29. Stover L, Gorga MP, Neely ST. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emissions measurements. J Acoust Soc Am 1996;100:956-67.
30. Subramaniam M, Henselman LW, Spongr V, Henderson D, Powers NL. Effect of high-frequency interrupted noise exposures on evoked-potential thresholds, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and outer hair cell loss. Ear Hear 1995;16:372-81.
31. Suckfüll M, Schneeweiss S, Dreher A, Schorn K. Evaluation of TEOAE and DPOAE measurements for the assessment of auditory thresholds in sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116:528-33.
32. Sutton LA, Lonsbury Martin BL, Martin GK, Whitehead ML. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2. Hear Res 1994;75:161-74.
33. Whitehead ML, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury Martin BL, Martin GK. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:2346-58.
34. Whitehead ML, Stagner BB, McCoy MJ, Lonsbury Martin BL, Martin GK. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1, L2 space. J Acoust Soc Am 1995;97:2359-77.
35. Wittmaack K. Über Schädigung des Gehörs durch Schalleinwirkung. Eine experimentelle Studie. Z Ohrenheilk 1907;54:37-80.
36. Zurek PM, Clark WW, Kim DO. The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1982;72:774-80.