Epidemiological studies of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Denmark 1989-1990 versus 1994-1995

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 305-309

  Jørgensen, Finn Stener ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b DEPARTMENT OF EPIDEMIOLOGY RESEARCH   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Obstetric ultrasound; Pregnancy; Screening; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; DENMARK; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD; OBSTETRIC CARE; PREGNANCY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCREENING; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; ULTRASOUND;

EID: 0033060814     PISSN: 00016349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/j.1600-0412.1999.780406.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. 1. Joørgensen FS. An epidemiological study of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Denmark 1989-1990. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1992; 71: 513-19.
2. 2. Jørgensen FS. Ultralydundersoøgelse af gravide kvinder i Danmark 1994-1995 - med beskrivelse af udviklingstræk siden 1989-1990. [Ultrasound examinations of pregnant women in Denmark 1994-1995 - with a description of the development since 1989-1990.] (In Danish, summary in English). Ugeskr Læger 1998; 160: 4205-10.
3. 3. Backe B, Jacobsen G, Bakketeig LS, Bergsjø P. Bruk av ultralyd ved norske fødeinstitusjoner. [Distribution and practice of diagnostic ultrasound in Norwegian obstetric institutions.] (In Norwegian, summary in English). Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1987; 107: 471-3.
4. 4. Nafstad P, Backe B. Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapsomsorg i 1988. [Prevalence and practice of obstetrical ultrasound examinations in Norway.] (In Norwegian, summary in English). Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1989; 109: 2975-8.
5. 5. Backe B. Rutinemessige ultralydundersøkelser i svangerskapsomsorgen i Norge, 1994. [Routine use of ultrasound in obstetrics in Norway, 1994.] (In Norwegian, summary in English). Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1997, 117: 2314-15.
6. 6. Backe B, Nafstad P, Saetnan AR. Reduced use of diagnostic obstetric ultrasound in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 649-50.
7. 7. Waldenström U, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Eklund G, Fall O, Lindeberg S et al. Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 1988; II: 585-8.
8. 8. Saari-Kemppainen A, Karjalainen O, Ylöstalo P, Heinonen OP. Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. Lancet 1990; 336: 387-91.
9. 9. LeFevre ML, Bain RP, Ewigman BG, Frigoletto FD, Crane JP McNellis D and the RADIUS Study Group. A randomized trial of prenatal ultrasonographic screening: impact on maternal management and outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 483-9.
10. 10. Geerts LTGM, Brand EJ, Theron GB. Routine obstetric ultrasound examinations in South Africa: cost and effect on perinatal outcome - a prospective randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 501-7.
11. 11. Backe B, Buhaug H (Eds). Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapet. Konsensuskonferansen 27-29/8-1986. [Use of ultrasound in pregnancy. Consensus conference 27-29/8-1986.] (In Norwegian, The Consensus Statement in English). NIS Report 8/86. Trondheim: Norwegian Institute of Hospital Research, 1986.
12. 12. Bruk av ultralyd i svangerskapet, Konsensuskonferance 28. februar 1. mars 1995, [Use of ultrasound In pregnancy. Consensus conference 28 February 1 March 1995.] (In Norwegian). Rapport nr. 9, Komitéen for medisinsk teknologivurdering. Oslo: Norges Forskningsråd, 1995.