Sonolysis of aqueous 4-nitrophenyl acetate - No evidence for hydrolysis induced by transient supercriticality

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 2198-2202

  Tauber, Armin ^a   Schuchmann, Heinz Peter ^a   Von Sonntag, Clemens ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL ENERGY CONVERSION   (Germany)

Author keywords

High temperature chemistry; Radical reactions; Radiolysis; Sonochemistry; Supercritical fluids

Indexed keywords

4 NITROPHENYL ACETATE; ACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ARGON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; DEGRADATION; GAMMA IRRADIATION; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; HYDROLYSIS; RADIOLYSIS;

EID: 0033060009     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3765(19990702)5:7<2198::aid-chem2198>3.0.co;2-e     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. K. S. Suslick, D. A. Hammerton, R. E. J. Cline, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5641-5642.
2. E. B. Flint, K. S. Suslick, Science 1991, 253, 1397-1399.
3. K. S. Suslick, D. A. Hammerton, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelec. Freq. Contr. 1986, UFCC-33, 143-147.
4. K. S. Suslick, Science 1990, 247, 1439-1445.
5. V. Misik, N. Miyoshi, P. Riesz, J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 3605-3611.
6. V. Misik, P. Riesz, Ultrason. Sonochem. 1996, 3, 25-37.
7. C. Sehgal, R. P. Steer, R. G. Sutherland, R. E. Verrall, J. Chem. Phys. 1979, 70, 2242-2248.
8. K. Makino, M. M. Mossoba, P. Riesz, J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 1369-1377.
9. K. Makino, M. M. Mossoba, P. Riesz, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 3537-3539 .
10. C. M. Krishna,T. Kondo, P. Riesz, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 5166-5172.
11. P. Riesz, D. Berdahl, C. L. Christman, Environ. Health Persp. 1985, 64, 233-252.
12. M. Gutierrez, A. Henglein, C.-H. Fischer, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1986, 50, 313-321.
13. A. Henglein, Ultrasonics 1987, 25, 6-16.
14. A. Henglein, Adv. Sonochem. 1993, 3, 17-83.
15. A. Henglein, M. Gutierrez, J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 3705-3707.
16. A. E. Alegria, Y. Lion, T. Kondo, P. Riesz, J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 4908-4913.
17. A. Kotronarou, G. Mills, M. R. Hoffmann, J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3630-3638.
18. M. R. Hoffmann, I. Hua, R. Höchemer, Ultrason. Sonochem. 1996, 3, 163-172.
19. I. Hua, R. H. Höchemer, M. R. Hoffmann, J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 2335-2342.
20. M. R. Hoffmann, I. Hua, R. Höchemer, D. Willberg, P. Lang, A. Kratel, in Chemistry under Extreme or Nonclassical Conditions (Eds: R. van Eldik, C. D. Hubbard), Wiley/Spectrum Akademischer Verlag, New York/Heidelberg, 1996, pp. 429-477.
21. T. Ando, M. Fujita, T. Kimura, Y. Kondo, J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 6048-6049.
22. A. Kirby, in Chemical Kinetics, Vol. 10 (Eds: C. H. Bamford, C. F. H. Tipper), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1972, pp. 155-207.
23. -1 (M. M. Kreevoy, R. W. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5590-5595). Thus, the hydrolytic effect of ionizing radiation is smaller than the free-radical effect by several orders of magnitude. (Nevertheless, this erroneous conception is found in some radiation-chemistry textbooks, for example ref. [28]). Thus, as expected, acetaldehyde formation in the acetal system is a free-radical-induced reaction (R. A. Basson, P. M. Champion, Nature 1966, 211, 1398-1399; M. N. Schuchmann, H.-P. Schuchmann, C. von Sonntag, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 403-407).
24. -1 (M. M. Kreevoy, R. W. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5590-5595). Thus, the hydrolytic effect of ionizing radiation is smaller than the free-radical effect by several orders of magnitude. (Nevertheless, this erroneous conception is found in some radiation-chemistry textbooks, for example ref. [28]). Thus, as expected, acetaldehyde formation in the acetal system is a free-radical-induced reaction (R. A. Basson, P. M. Champion, Nature 1966, 211, 1398-1399; M. N. Schuchmann, H.-P. Schuchmann, C. von Sonntag, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 403-407).
25. -1 (M. M. Kreevoy, R. W. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5590-5595). Thus, the hydrolytic effect of ionizing radiation is smaller than the free-radical effect by several orders of magnitude. (Nevertheless, this erroneous conception is found in some radiation-chemistry textbooks, for example ref. [28]). Thus, as expected, acetaldehyde formation in the acetal system is a free-radical-induced reaction (R. A. Basson, P. M. Champion, Nature 1966, 211, 1398-1399; M. N. Schuchmann, H.-P. Schuchmann, C. von Sonntag, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 403-407).
26. -1 (M. M. Kreevoy, R. W. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5590-5595). Thus, the hydrolytic effect of ionizing radiation is smaller than the free-radical effect by several orders of magnitude. (Nevertheless, this erroneous conception is found in some radiation-chemistry textbooks, for example ref. [28]). Thus, as expected, acetaldehyde formation in the acetal system is a free-radical-induced reaction (R. A. Basson, P. M. Champion, Nature 1966, 211, 1398-1399; M. N. Schuchmann, H.-P. Schuchmann, C. von Sonntag, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 403-407).
27. -1 (M. M. Kreevoy, R. W. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1955, 77, 5590-5595). Thus, the hydrolytic effect of ionizing radiation is smaller than the free-radical effect by several orders of magnitude. (Nevertheless, this erroneous conception is found in some radiation-chemistry textbooks, for example ref. [28]). Thus, as expected, acetaldehyde formation in the acetal system is a free-radical-induced reaction (R. A. Basson, P. M. Champion, Nature 1966, 211, 1398-1399; M. N. Schuchmann, H.-P. Schuchmann, C. von Sonntag, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 403-407).
28. E. J. Hart, C.-H. Fischer, A. Henglein, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1990, 36, 511-516.
29. D. N. Rassokhin, L. T. Bugaenko, G. V. Kovalev, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1995, 45, 251-255.
30. G. Mark, A. Tauber, R. Laupert, H.-P. Schuchmann, D. Schulz, A. Mues, C. von Sonntag, Ultrason. Sonochem. 1998, 5, 41-52.
31. C. von Sonntag, G. Mark, A. Tauber, H.-P. Schuchmann, Adv. Sonochem. 1999, 5, 109-145.
32. J. W. T. Spinks, R. J. Woods, Introduction to Radiation Chemistry, 3rd ed., Wiley, New York, 1990.
33. A. Henglein, W. Schnabel, J. Wendenburg, Einführung in die Strahlenchemie, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1969.
34. Deutsches Institut für Normung, Normenausschuss Wasserwesen, 1981, 9. Lieferung (DIN 38405 D 10).
35. P. Bocek, M. Deml, P. Gebaur, V. Dolnik, Analytical Isotachophoresis, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1988.
36. F. Weeke, E. Bastian, G. Schomburg, Chromatographia 1974, 7, 163-170.
37. H. Yamada, I. Somiya, Ozone Sci. Eng. 1989, 11, 127-141.
38. A. O. Allen, C. J. Hochanadel, J. A. Ghormley, T. W. Davis, J. Phys. Chem. 1952, 56, 575-586.
39. C. von Sonntag, H.-P. Schuchmann, Methods Enzymol. 1994, 233, 3-20.
40. C. von Sonntag, The Chemical Basis of Radiation Biology, Taylor & Francis, London, 1987.
41. M. Anbar, I. Pecht, J. Phys. Chem. 1964, 68, 1460-1462.
42. E. J. Hart, A. Henglein, J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 4342-4347.
43. J. Warnatz, Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 1008-1022.
44. E. J. Hart, A. Henglein, J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 5992-5995.
45. C. von Sonntag, G. Mark, H.-P. Schuchmann, J. von Sonntag, A. Tauber, Chemical Processes under Extreme or Nonclassical Conditions (Eds: J.-L. Luche, C. Balny, S. Bénéfice, J. M. Denis, C. Pétrier), E.U. Directorate General, Science, Research and Development, Luxembourg, 1998, pp. 11-19.
46. M. Gutierrez, A. Henglein, J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 6044-6047.
47. A. Henglein, C. Kormann, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 1985, 48, 251-258.
48. K. Eiben, D. Schulte-Frohlinde, C. Suarez, H. Zorn, Int. J. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1971, 3, 409-418.
49. O. Volkert, G. Termens, D. Schulte-Frohlinde, Z. Phys. Chem. (Frankfurt/Main) 1967, 56, 261-267.
50. P. O'Neill, S. Steenken, H. J. van der Linde, D. Schulte-Frohlinde, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 1978, 12, 13-17.
51. C. Suarez, F. Louys, K. Günther, K. Eiben, Tetrahedron Letters 1970, 575-578.
52. D. Gräßlin, F. Merger, D. Schulte-Frohlinde, O. Volkert, Z. Physik. Chem. N.F. (Frankfurt/Main) 1966, 51, 84-94.
53. A. Tauber, Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum 1998.
54. S. Steenken, N. V. Raghavan, J. Phys. Chem. 1979, 83, 3101-3107.
55. D. Wang, H.-P. Schuchmann, C. von Sonntag, Z. Naturforsch. 1993, 48b, 761-770.
56. A. Tauber, H.-P. Schuchmann, C. von Sonntag, Vltrason. Sonochem., in press.
57. W. L. Marshall, E. U. Franck, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1981, 10, 295-304.
58. R. W. Shaw, T. B. Brill, A. A. Clifford, C. A. Eckert, E. U. Franck, Chem. Eng. News 1991, 69, 26-39.