A prospective evaluation of PTFE graft patency and surveillance techniques in hemodialysis access

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 191-198

  Cinat, Marianne E ^a   Hopkins, Judith ^a   Wilson, Samuel E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; POLITEF; UROKINASE;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTERY STEAL SYNDROME; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; COMORBIDITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; GRAFT PATENCY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HEMODIALYSIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE THROMBOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL TIME; VASCULAR ACCESS; VENOUS PRESSURE;

EID: 0033059243     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100169900241     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Kolff WJ, Berk THJ. The artificial kidney: a dialyser with a great area. Acta Med Scand 1944;117:121-131.
2. Quinton WE, Dillard D, Scribner BH. Cannulation of blood vessels for prolonged hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1960;6:104-113.
3. Brescia MJ, Cimino JE, Appel K, Hurwich BJ. Chronic hemodialysis using venipuncture and a surgically created arteriovenous fistula. N Engl J Med 1966;275:1089-1092.
4. Anderson CB, Sicard GA, Etheredge EE. Bovine carotid artery and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for hemodialysis vascular access. J Surg Res 1980;29:184-188.
5. Butler HG, Baker LD, Johnson JM. Vascular access for chronic hemodialysis: polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) versus bovine heterograft. Am J Surg 1977;134:791-793.
6. Hurt AV, Batello-Cruz M, Skipper BJ, et al. Bovine carotid artery heterografts versus polytetrafluoroethylene grafts - a prospective, randomized study. Am J Surg 1983;146:844-847.
7. Oakes DD, Spees EK Jr, Light JA, et al. A three-year experience using modified bovine arterial heterografts for vascular access in patients requiring hemodialysis. Ann Surg 1978; 187:423-429.
8. Jamil Z, O'Donnell JA, Merk EA, et al. A comparison of knitted Dacron velour and bovine heterograft for hemodialysis access. J Surg Res 1979;26:423-429.
9. Burdick JF, Scott W, Cosimi B. Experience with Dacron graft arteriovenous fistulas for dialysis access. Ann Surg 1978; 187:262-266.
10. Dardick H, Ibrahim IM, Dardik I. Arteriovenous fistulas constructed with modified human umbilical cord vein graft. Arch Surg 1976;111:60-62.
11. Jenkins AM, Buist TA, Glover SD. Medium-term follow-up of forty autogenous vein and forty polytetrafluoroethylene (Gore-tex) grafts for vascular access. Surgery 1980;88:667-673.
12. Baker LD, Johnson JM, Goldferb D. Expanded PTFE subcutaneous arteriovenous conduit: an improved vascular access for chronic hemodialysis. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1976;22:382-387.
13. Palder SB, Kirkman RL, Whittemore AD, et al. Vascular access for hemodialysis - patency rates and results of revision. Ann Surg 1985;202:235-239.
14. Rizzuti RP, Hale JC, Burkart TE. Extended patency of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts for vascular access using optimal configuration and revisions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1988;166:23-27.
15. Munda R, First R, Alexander W, Linneman CC, et al. Polytetrafluoroethylene graft survival in hemodialysis. JAMA 1983;249:219-222.
16. Burger H, Kluchert BA, Kootstra G, et al. Survival of arteriovenous fistulas and shunts for haemodialysis. Eur J Surg 1995;161:327-334.
17. Kherlakian GM, Roedersheimer LR, Arbaugh JJ, et al. Comparison of autogenous fistula versus expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft fistula for angioaccess in hemodialysis. Am J Surg 1986;152:238-243.
18. Sparks SR, Vanderlein JL, Gnanadev DA, et al. Superior patency of perforating antecubital vein arteriovenous fistulae for hemodialysis. Ann Vasc Surg 1997;11:165-167.
19. Safa AA, Valji K, Roberts AC, et al. Detection and treatment of dysfunctional hemodialysis access grafts: effect of a surveillance program on graft patency and the incidence of thrombosis. Radiology 1996;199:653-657.
20. Hodges TC, Fillinger MF, Zwolak RM, et al. Longitudinal comparison of dialysis access methods: risk factors for failure. J Vasc Surg 1997;26:1009-1019.
21. Enzler MA, Rajmon T, Lachat M, et al. Long-term function of vascular access for hemodialysis. Clin Transplant 1996;10: 511-515.
22. The Vascular Access Work Group. NFK-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access. Am J Kidney Dis 1997;30(Suppl 3):S150-191.
23. Kennedy MT, Quinton H, Bubolz TA, Wennberg JE, Wilson SE. An analysis of the patency of vascular access grafts for hemodialysis using the Medicare Part B claims database. Semin Vasc Surg 1996;9:262-265.
24. Nakagawa Y, Kazuo O, Sato Y, et al. Complications in blood access for hemodialysis. Artif Organs 1994;18:283-288.
25. Raju S. PTFE grafts for hemodialysis access - techniques for insertion and management of complications. Ann Surg 1987;206:666-673.
26. Brotman DN, Fandos L, Faust GR, et al. Hemodialysis graft salvage. J Am Coll Surg 1994;178:431-434.
27. Dinwiddie LC, Frauman AC, Jaques PF, et al. Comparison of measures for prospective identification of venous stenosis. Am Nephrol Nurs Assoc J 1996;23:593-600.
28. May RE, Himmelfarb J, Yenicesu M, et al. Predictive measures of vascular access thrombosis: a prospective study. Kidney Int 1996;52:1656-1662.