Research misconduct in clinical research - The American experience and response

Acta Oncologica

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 93-97

  Ryan, Kenneth J ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; LEGAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL ETHICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; QUALITY CONTROL; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

HUMANS; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033056917     PISSN: 0284186X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/028418699431861     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Edsall JT. On the hazards of whistleblowing. Science and Engineering Ethics 1995; 1: 329-40.
2. Broad W, Wade N. Betrayers of the truth. New York: Touchstone, 1982.
3. Altman LK. Flawed data jolt gene-mapping study. The New York Times 1996: Oct 30: Sec A: 12 (col 4).
4. Waldholz M. NIH scientist says junior researcher falsified data for leukemia study. The New York Times, 1996: Oct 30: Sec B: 4 (col 4).
5. Glaser S. Combating scientific misconduct. CQ Researcher 1997; 7: 1-24.
6. Kohn A. False prophets. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
7. Lock S. Research misconduct. In: Lock S, Wells F, eds. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. London: Br Med J Publishing, 1993: 5-41.
8. Kuzma SM. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research. U. Michigan J. Law Reform 1992; 25: 327-421.
9. LaFollette MC. The politics of research misconduct. J Higher Education 1994; 65: 261-85.
10. Office of Reseach Integrity. Annual Report 1996. Rockville MD, Department of Health and Human Services, 1997.
11. Report of the Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and misconduct in research. Rockville MD, Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.
12. Wolf P. Fraud in science: how much, how serious? Hastings Center Report 1981; 11: 9-14.
13. Alberts B, Shine K. Scientists and the integrity of research. Science 1994; 266: 1660-1.
14. Greenberg DS. The misconduct follies. Science & Government Report 1994 (June); 24: 1-4.
15. Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (US). Panel on scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. In: Responsible Science. Vol. 1. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1992.
16. Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy (US). Panel on scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. In: Responsible Science, Vol. 2. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1992.
17. Swazey JP, Anderson MS, Louis KS. American Scientist 1993; 81: 542-53.
18. American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Code of Ethics. ASBMB News, 1998: Mar-Apr. 7(2)-5.
19. Shapiro MF. Data audits in investigational drug trials and their implications for detection of misconduct in science. In: Lock S, Wells F. Fraud and misconduct in medical research. London: Br Med J Publishing, 1993: 128-41.