The value of specialist oncological radiology review of cross-sectional imaging

Clinical Radiology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 149-154

  Loughrey, G J ^a   Carrington, B M ^a   Anderson, H ^a   Dobson, M J ^b   Lo Ying Ping, F ^a  

^a CHRISTIE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL PRESTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancer; Computed tomography (CT); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) interpretation; Radiological review

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CANCER; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LYMPHADENOPATHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDIASTINUM; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 0033055354     PISSN: 00099260     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0009-9260(99)91003-6     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Royal College of Radiologists. The Use of Computed Tomography in the Initial Investigation of Common Malignancies. London: Council of the Royal College of Radiologists, 1994.
2. Hricak H, Kalbhen CL, Scheidler JE, et al. Value of expert interpretation in abdominal oncologic imaging: A multicentre study. (Abstract) Radiological Society of North America 83rd Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting 1997: 225.
3. Department of Health. A Policy Framework for Commissioning Cancer Services: a Report by the Expert Advisory Group on Cancer to the Chief Medical Officers of England and Wales. London: Department of Health, 1995.
4. Department of Health. The New NHS Modern, Dependable. London: Department of Health, 1997.