A quantitative comparison of induction and challenge concentrations inducing a 50% positive response in three skin sensitization tests; the Guinea pig maximization test, adjuvant and patch test and Buehler test

Journal of Toxicological Sciences

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 123-131

  Nakamura, Yosuke ^a   Higaki, Tamaki ^a   Kato, Hiroshi ^a   Kishida, Fumio ^a   Kogiso, Sigefumi ^a   Isobe, Naohiko ^a   Kaneko, Hideo ^a  

^a Environ Health Science Laboratory   (Japan)

Author keywords

Adjuvant and patch test; Allergic contact dermatitis; Buehler test; GPMT; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

1 CHLORO 2,4 DINITROBENZENE; MALEIC ANHYDRIDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; GUINEA PIG; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN SENSITIZATION; SKIN TEST;

EID: 0033053167     PISSN: 03881350     EISSN: 18803989     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2131/jts.24.123     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Barratt, M. D., Basketter, D. A. and Roberts, D. W. (1994): Skin sensitization structure-activity relationships for phenyl benzoate. Toxic. in Vitro., 8 (4), 823-826.
2. Benezra, C. (1991): Structure-activity relationships of skin haptens with a closer look at compounds used in transdermal devices. J. Controlled Release., 15, 267-270.
3. Botham, P. A., Basketter, D. A., Maurer, T. and Bontinck, W. J. (1991): Skin sensitization; A critical review of predictive test methods in animals and man. Fd. Chem. Toxic., 29(4), 275-286.
4. Buehler, E. V. (1965): Delayed contact hypersensitivity in the guinea pig. Arch. Dermatol., 91, 171-177.
5. Buehelr, E. V. (1996): Nonspecific hypersensitivity: false-positive responses with the use of Freund's complete adjuvant. Contact Dermatitis., 34, 111-114.
6. Catalona, W. J., Taylor, P. T., Rabson, A. S. and Chretien, P. B. (1972): A method for dinitrochlorobenzene contact sensitization. N. Engl. J. Med., 286 (8), 399-402.
7. Dupuis, G. and Benzera, G. (1992): Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Simple Chemicals, pp. 1-85, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
8. EC. (1992): Official Journal of the European Communities., No. L383A (35).
9. EPA. (1985): EPA Toxic Substances Control Act Test Guidelines., 798, 4100.
10. Fahr, H., Noster, U. and Schilz, K. H. (1976): Comparison of guinea pig sensitization methods. Contact Dermatitis., 2, 335-339.
11. Friedmann, P. S., Moss, C., Shuster, S. and Simpson, J. M. (1983): Quantitative relationships between sensitizing dose of DNCB and reactivity in normal subjects. Clin. Exp. Immunol., 53, 709-715.
12. Goodwin, B. F. J., Crevel, R. W. R. and Johnson, A. W. (1981): A comparison of three guinea pig sensitization procedures for the detection of 19 reported human contact sensitizers. Contact Dermatitis., 7, 248-258.
13. Goransson, K. (1977): Allergic contact dermatitis to an epoxy hardener: dodecenyl-succinic anhydride. Contact Dermatitis., 3, 277-278.
14. Groot, A. C., Liem, D. H., Nater, J. P. and Ketel, W. G. (1985): Patch tests with fragrance materials and preservatives. Contact Dermatitis., 12, 87-92.
15. Mansch, C., Hoekman, D., Leo, A., Zhang, L. and Li, P. (1995): The expanding role of quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) in toxicology. Toxicol. Lett., 79(1-3), 45-53.
16. Magnusson, B. and Kligman, A. M. (1969): The identification of contact allergens by animal assay. The guinea pig maximization test. J. Invest. Dermatol., 52, 268-276.
17. Marzulli, F. and Maguire, H. C. (1982): Usefulness and limitations of various guinea-pig test methods in detecting human skin sensitizers. Fd. Chem. Toxic., 20, 67-74.
18. Marzulli, F. N. and Maibach, H. I. (1991): Dermatotoxicology. Fourth edition. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.
19. Maurer, T., Thomann, P., Weirich, E. G. and Hess, R. (1978): Predictive evaluation in chemicals of the contact allergic potential of medically important substances. Contact Dermatitis., 4, 321-333.
20. Microsoft EXCEL users guide (1994): pp369-384, Microsoft corp.
21. Momma, J., Kitajima, S. and Inoue, T. (1998): The guinea-pig skin sensitization test revisited: an evaluation formula to predict possible sensitization levels for eight chemicals used in household products. Toxicology., 126, 75-82.
22. Motolese, A., Truzzi, M., Giannini, A. and Seidenari, S. (1993): Contact dermatitis and contact sensitization among enamellers and decorators in the ceramics industry. Contact Dermatitis., 28, 59-62.
23. Nakamura, A., Momma, J., Sekiguchi, H., Noda, T, Yamano, T., Kaniwa, M., Kojima, S., Tsuda, M. and Kurokawa, Y. (1994): A new protocol and criteria for quantitative determination of sensitization potencies of chemicals by guinea pig maximization test. Contact Dermatitis., 31, 72-85.
24. OECD. (1992): OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals., 406.
25. Pinckard, R. N. and Weir, D. M. (1967): Equilibrium Dialysis and Preparation of Hapten Conjugates. Handbook of experimental immunology., pp.493-526, Blackwell Sci. Publ., Oxford.
26. Prince, H. N. and Prince, T. G. (1977): Comparative guinea pig assay for contact hypersensitivity. Cosmet. Toilet., 9, 53-59.
27. Roberts, D. W. and Basketter, D. A. (1990): A quantitative structure activity/dose response relationship for contact allergic potential of alkyl group transfer agents. Contact Dermatitis., 23, 331-335.
28. Sato, Y., Katsumura, Y., Ichikawa, H., Kobayashi, T., Kozuka, T., Morikawa, F. and Ohta, S. (1981): A modified technique of guinea pig testing to identify delayed hypersensitivity allergens. Contact Dermatitis., 7, 225-237.
29. Sato, Y. (1985): Modified guinea pig maximization test. Curr. Probl. Derm., 14, 193-200.
30. Unno, T., Sekine, M., Gon, H., Takeuchi, Y., Itoh, M., Osamura, H. and Ishihara, M. (1985): Conjugation of some phenolic and cinnamic compounds with monodansyl cadaverine. Hifu., 27(3), 592-596.