Modeling and sharing geographic data with INTERLIS

Computers and Geosciences

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 49-59

  Keller, S F ^a  

^a Ctr Competence INTERLIS E   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Conceptual schema language; Data definition language; Federated systems; Interoperability; Model based data transfer

Indexed keywords

DATA INTERPRETATION; GIS;

EID: 0033048857     PISSN: 00983004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-3004(98)00105-8     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abelson, H., Sussman, J., 1985. Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 542 pp.
2. Bartelme, N., 1995. Geoinformatik: Modelle, Strukturen, Funktionen. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
3. Berre, A.-J., Skogan, D., 1997. A language specification approach to semantic interoperability. In: Appendix 3: Position Papers of Goodchild, M. F. et al. (eds.). Interoperating GISs - Report of a Specialist Meeting Held under the Auspices of the Varenius Project Panel on Computational Implementations of Geographic Conceps. December 5-6, 1997, Santa Barbara, California.
4. Buehler, K., McKee, L., 1996. The OpenGIS guide. OGIS TC Document 96-01. Open GIS Consortium (http://www.opengis.org).
5. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., 1997. Unified modeling language semantics and notation guide 1.0. Rational Software Corporation, San Jose, California, (http://www.rational.com).
6. Breunig, M., Perkhoff, A., 1992. Data and system integration for geoscientific data. Proc. 5th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, vol. 1. Charleston, South Carolina, pp. 272-281.
7. CEN, 1992. Resolution of CEN/TC 287 first meeting in Brussels. TC 287 N21 AFNOR. Association Francaise de Normalisation.
8. Chen P. The entity-relationship model: towards a unified view of data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems. 1(1):1976;9-36.
9. Codd E.F. A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Communications of the ACM. 13(6):1970;377-387.
10. Dorfschmid, J., Gnägi, H.R., 1994. Views on requirements for data description techniques with examples from INTERLIS. Proceedings of the Workshop on Data Description Techniques for Geographic Information, Copenhagen, 4.2.1994, CEN/TC 287 WG1 Document N39. Norwegian Mapping Authority, Hønefoss N.
11. Frank, A., Kuhn, W., 1995. Specifying open GIS with functional languages, advances in spatial databases (SSD'95). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 951. Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp. 184-195.
12. Gardels, K., 1996. The Open GIS approach to distributed geodata and geoprocessing. Proc. 3rd International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, Santa Fe, New Mexico, January 21-25. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis, University of California.
13. Goodchild, M.F., Egenhofer, M.J., Fegeas, R., 1997. Interoperating GIS's: Report of a specialist meeting held under the auspices of the Varenius Project Panel on Computational Implementations of Geographic Concepts. Santa Barbara, California, December 5-6 (http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/conf/interop97/interop_toc.html).
14. Guptill, S.C., 1994. Synchronization of discrete geospatial data bases. 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, vol. 2. Edinburgh, pp. 945-956.
15. Huber, M., Schneider, D., 1999. Spatial data standards in view of models of space and the functions operating on them. Computers & Geosciences, 25, 25-38.
16. Hull, R., King, R., 1987. Semantic database modeling: survey, applications and research issues. ACM Computing Surveys 0, 201-260.
17. Ignas, E., 1994. A framework for query processing in a federated database system: a case study. URISA 1994 Annual Conference Proceedings, vol. 1. Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, Washington, D.C., pp. 167-178.
18. infoGrips GmbH, 1997. ig/Check: a geodata checker for INTERLIS. Zurich, Switzerland (http://www.infogrips/ch).
19. INTERLIS, 1997. INTERLIS: a data exchange mechanism for land information systems, Version 1, Revision 1. Federal Department of Cadastral Surveying, Berne (http:://www.geod.ethz.ch/gf/interlis/).
20. INTERLIS, 1998. Draft INTERLIS, Version 2. Federal Department of Cadastral Surveying, Berne (http://www.gir.ethj.ch).
21. ISO/TC184, 1995. ISO/TC184 SC4/WG5 N243, EXPRESS-M reference manual. CIMIO, July.
22. ISO/TC211, 1994. ISO/TC211 Geographic information/Geomatics. Family of standards numbered ISO 15046, part nn (http://www.statkart.no/isotc211/welcome.html).
23. Kemp, Z., 1991. An object-oriented data model for spatial data. Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, vol. 2. Department of Geography, University of Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 659-668.
24. Kuhn, W., 1994. Defining semantics for spatial data transfers. 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling vol. 2. Edinburgh, Scotland, pp. 973-987.
25. Laurini, R., Thompson, D., 1992. Fundamentals of Spatial Information Systems, APIC Series No. 37. Academic Press, New York.
26. LAS, 1996. Open Geographic Datastore Interface (OGDI), Version 1.0: Programmer's Reference. Logiciels et Applications Scientifiques, 145 pp.
27. Markley, R.W., 1990. Data Communications and Interoperability. Prentice-Hall, 289 pp.
28. Nagel, G., 1997. Amtliche basisdaten des bayerischen landesvemessungsamts für kommunale informationssysteme, Kartographische Nachrichten No. 4, August, pp. 148-153.
29. Nilsson, B., 1979. On models and mappings in a data base environment: a holistic approach to data modeling. Unpublished dissertation.
30. Postel, J., 1993. Internet official protocol standards, STD 1, RFC 1540. Internet Architecture Board, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California, Marina del Rey, October.
31. Rigaux, Ph., Scholl M., 1994. Multiple representation modelling and querying. Proc. IGIS '94: Geographic Information Systems, International Workshop on Advanced Information Systems, Monte Verita, Ascona, Switzerland, February 28-March 4. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 884. Springer, Berlin, pp. 59-69.
32. SAIF, 1994. Spatial archive and interchange format: formal definition (release 3.1). Survey and Resource Mapping Branch, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, British Columbia, Canada (17 documents totally, 284 pp).
33. SDTS, 1992. Spatial Data Transfer Standard (SDTS). Federal Information Processing Standards 173. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Maryland.
34. Sondheim, M., 1997. Personal perspectives on geospatial data management and interoperability. Advanced Database Symposium. Tokyo, December 15.
35. US Government, 1994. Coordinating geographic data acquisition and access: the national spatial data infrastructure. Office of the Press Secretary, The White House, Washington, D.C., April.
36. Voisard, A., Schweppe, H., 1997. Abstraction and decomposition in interoperable GIS. ICSI Technical Report No. 97006, March 1997 (ftp.ICSI. Berkeley, EDUJ. To appear in International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, in press.
37. Voser, S.A., 1995. Datenaustausch zwischen Geo-Informationssystemen: Abbildung zwischen zwei Datenmodellen auf konzeptioneller und logischer Ebene. 3. Deutsche Arc/Info-Anwenderkonferenz. März 1995.
38. VRML2, 1996. The Virtual Reality Modeling Language Specification, Version 2.0. The VRML Architecture Group and the VRML Consortium, August 4.
39. Wirth, N., 1981. Compilerbau. Teubner Studienbücher Informatik (36), B.G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 94 pp.
40. Woodsford, P.A., 1996. Spatial database update: the key to effective automation. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, vol. XXXI, Part B4. Vienna, pp. 955-961.
41. Yuan, M., 1997. Development of a global conceptual schema for interoperable geographic information. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Interoperating Geographic Information Systems (Interop'97). Santa Barbara, California.