Hazardous air pollution from mobile sources: A comparison of alternative fuel and reformulated gasoline vehicles

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 576-581

  Winebrake, James J ^a   Deaton, Michael L ^a  

^a JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FUEL; GASOLINE;

AIR POLLUTION; ARTICLE; EXHAUST GAS; MOTOR VEHICLE; PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0033046886     PISSN: 10473289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463828     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. National Air Pollutant Emission Trends; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1996.
2. Black, F.M. “Control of motor vehicle emissions—The U.S. experience," Crit. Rev. in Environ. Control. 1991, 21, 373-410.
3. LeBlanc, D.C.; Saunders, F.M.; Meyer, M.D.; Guensler, R. “Driving pattern variability and impacts on vehicle carbon monoxide emissions," Transportation Res. Record 1995, 1472, 45-52.
4. Stump, F.D.; Knapp, K.T.; Ray, W.D.; Siudak, P.D.; Snow, R.F. “Influence of oxygenated fuels on the emissions from three pre-1985 light-duty passenger vehicles," J. Air &Waste Manage. Assoc. 1994, 44, 781-786.
5. Kirchstetter, T.W.; Singer, B.C.; Harley, R.A.; Kendall, G.R.; Chan, W. “Impact of oxygenated gasoline use on California light-duty vehicle emissions," Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30, 661-670.
6. Winebrake, J.J. “Another challenge for energy/environmental strategists: Federal laws affecting vehicle fleets," Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environ. 1994, 13, 52-67.
7. Alternatives to Traditional Transportation Fuels 1996; U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1997; DOE/EIA-0585(94)/1.
8. Annual Energy Outlook, 1994; U.S. Department of Energy. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1994.
9. Winebrake, J.J.; Farrell, A.E. “The AFV credit program and its role in future market development," Transportation Res.: Part D—'and the Environ. 1997, 2, 125-132.
10. Gabele, P. “Exhaust emissions from in-use alternative fuel vehicles," J. Air &Waste Manage. Assoc. 1995, 45, 770-777.
11. Kelly, K.J.; Bailey, B.K.; Coburn, T.C.; Clark, W.; Eudy, L.; Lissiuk, P. “FTP emissions test results from flexible-fuel methanol Dodge Spirits and Ford Econoline vans," SAE Technical Paper Series 1996, 961090, 207-230.
12. Kelly, K.J.; Bailey, B.K.; Coburn, T.C.; Eudy, L.; Lissiuk, P. “Round 1 emissions test results from compressed natural gas vans and gasoline controls operating in the U.S. federal fleet," SAE Technical Paper Series 1996, 961091, 233-248.
13. Kelly, K.J.; Bailey, B.K.; Coburn, T.C.; Clark, W.; Lissiuk, P. “Federal test procedure emissions test results from ethanol variable-fuel vehicle Chevrolet Luminas," SAE Technical Paper Series 1996, 961092, 249-268.
14. Motor Vehicle-Related Air Toxics Study; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources. U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, 1993; EPA-420-R-93-005.
15. Gabele, P. “Characterization of emissions from a variable gasoline/methanol fueled car," J. Air &Waste Manage. Assoc. 1990, 40, 296-304.
16. Definition of a Low-Emission Motor Vehicle in Compliance with the Mandates of Health and Safety Code Section 39037.05; California Air Resources Board. Mobile Source Division. CARB: El Monte, CA, 1989.
17. Proposed Reactivity Adjustment Factors for Transitional Low-Emission Vehicles: Technical Support Document; California Air Resources Board. Mobile Source Division. CARB: El Monte, CA, 1991.
18. Emissions and Air Quality Modeling Results from Methanol/Gasoline Blends in Prototype Flexible/Variable Fuel Vehicles; Technical Bulletin No. 7; Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Coordinating Research Council: Atlanta, GA, 1992.
19. Emissions of Three Dedicated-Methanol Vehicles; Technical Bulletin No. 10; Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Coordinating Research Council: Atlanta, GA, 1992.