Expression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae MATa and MATα enhances the HO endonuclease-stimulation of chromosomal rearrangements directed by his3 recombinational substrates

Mutation Research - DNA Repair

Volumn 433, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 33-44

  Fasullo, Michael ^a,b   Bennett, Thomas ^b   Dave, Pragnesh ^b  

^a ALBANY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Chromosomal rearrangement; DNA damage; Endonuclease; Yeast

Indexed keywords

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; ENDONUCLEASE;

ARTICLE; CELL VIABILITY; CHROMOSOME INVERSION; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; DIPLOIDY; DNA CLEAVAGE; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE TRANSLOCATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HAPLOIDY; HETEROZYGOSITY; LETHALITY; MATING TYPE; MITOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOSENSITIVITY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOMES; DEOXYRIBONUCLEASES, TYPE II SITE-SPECIFIC; DNA DAMAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; GENES, FUNGAL; GENES, MATING TYPE, FUNGAL; HYDRO-LYASES; MITOSIS; PLOIDIES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 0033046872     PISSN: 09218777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8777(98)00059-7     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. F.M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R.E. Kingston, D.D. Moore, J.G. Seidman, J.A. Smith, K. Struhl (Eds.), Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. USA Current Protocols, Wiley, 1994.
2. Bennett C.B., Lewis A.L., K Baldwin K., Resnick M.A. Lethality induced by a single site-specific double-strand break in a dispensable yeast plasmid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90:1993;5613-5617.
3. Boeke J.D., Lacroute F., Fink G.R. A positive selection for mutants lacking orotidene-5′-phosphate decarboxylase activity in yeast: 5-fluoro-orotic acid resistance. Mol. Gen. Genet. 197:1984;345-347.
4. Chen D., Yang B., Kuo T. One-step transformation of yeast in stationary phase. Curr. Genetics. 21:1992;83-84.
5. Chu G.D., Vollrath D., Davis R.W. Separation of large DNA molecules by contour-clamped homogeneous electric fields. Science. 234:1986;1582-1585.
6. Cole G.M., Schild D., Lovett S.T., Mortimer R.K. Regulation of RAD54- and RAD52-lacZ gene fusion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:1987;1078-1084.
7. Fasullo M., Bennett T., AhChing P., Koudelik J. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint reduces the DNA damage-associated stimulation of directed translocations. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:1998;1190-1200.
8. Fasullo M.T., Davis R.W. Direction of chromosomal rearrangements in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae by use of his3 recombinational substrates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1988;4370-4380.
9. Fasullo M.T., Dave P. Mating type regulates the radiation-associated stimulation of reciprocal translocation events in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 243:1994;63-70.
10. Fishman-Lobell J., Rudin N., Haber J.E. Two alternative pathways of double-strand break repair that are kinetically separable and independently modulated. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1992;1293-1303.
11. E. Friedberg, G. Walker, W. Siede, 1995. DNA Repair and Mutagenesis. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
12. Fris J., Roman H. The effect of the mating-type alleles on intragenic recombination in yeast. Genetics. 59:1968;33-36.
13. J.C. Game, Radiation-sensitive mutants and repair in yeast, in: J.F.T. Spencer, D.M. Spencer, A.R.W. Smith (Eds.), Yeast Genetics, Fundamental and Applied Aspects, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983, pp. 109-137.
14. Gangloff S., Zhou H., Rothstein R. Gene conversion plays the major role in controlling the stability of large tandem repeats in yeast. EMBO Journal. 15:1996;1715-1725.
15. S.L. Gerring, C. Connelly, P. Hieter, Positional mapping of genes by chromosome blotting and chromosome fragmentation, in: C. Guthrie, G. Fink (Eds.), Guide to Yeast Genetics and Molecular Biology, Academic Press, New York, 1991, pp. 57-77.
16. Guacci V., Houton E., Koshland D. Chromosome condensation and sister chromatid pairing in budding yeast. J. Cell. Biol. 125:1994;517-531.
17. I. Herskowitz, J. Rine, J. Strathern, Mating-type determination and mating-type interconversion in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in: J.R. Broach, J.R. Pringle, E.W. Jones (Eds.), The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces, Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press, New York, 1992, pp. 583-656.
18. Heude M., Fabre F. a/α-Control of DNA repair in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: genetic and physiological aspects. Genetics. 133:1993;489-498.
19. Jensen R., Herskowitz I. Directionality and regulation of cassette substitution in yeast. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 49:1984;13-21.
20. Jinks-Roberston S.J., Michelitch M., Ramcharan S. Substrate length requirements for efficient mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:1993;3937-3950.
21. Kadyk L.C., Hartwell L.H. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 132:1992;387-402.
22. Klein H. RADH54, a RAD54 homologue in Saccharomyces cerevisae, is required for mitotic diploid-specific recombination and repair and for meiosis. Genetics. 147:1997;1533-1543.
23. Kupiec M., Steinlaug R. Damage-induced ectopic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutation Res. 384:1997;33-44.
24. Larimer F.W., Morse C.C., Beek A.K., Cole K.W., Gaertner F.H. Isolation of the ARO1 cluster gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell Biol. 3:1983;1609-1614.
25. Mortimer R.K. Radiobiological and genetic studies on a polyploid series (haploid to hexaploid) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Radiat. Res. 9:1958;312-326.
26. Nickoloff J.A., Chen E.Y., Heffron F. A 24-base-pair DNA sequence from the MAT locus stimulates intergenic recombination in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 83:1986;7831-7835.
27. Obe G., Johanes C., Schulte-Frohlinde D. DNA double-strand breaks induced by sparsely ionizing radiation and endonucleases as critical lesions for cell death, chromosomal aberrations, mutations, and oncogenic transformation. Mutagenesis. 7:1992;3-12.
28. T.D. Petes, R.E. Malone, L.S. Symington, Recombination in yeast, in: J.R. Broach, J.R. Pringle, E.W. Jones (Eds.), The Molecular and Cellular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces, Cold Spring Harbor Lab Press, New York, 1991, pp. 407-523.
29. Potter H. Electroporation in biology: methods, applications and instrumentation. Anal. Biochem. 174:1988;361-373.
30. Resnick M.A., Martin P. The repair of DSBs in the nuclear DNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its nuclear control. Mol. Gen. Genet. 143:1976;119-129.
31. Rudin N., Haber J.E. A novel HO-endonuclease-initiated recombination event between repeated sequences. Mol. Cell. Biol. 8:1988;3918-3928.
32. Sandell L., Zakian V. Loss of a yeast telomere: arrest, recovery and chromosome loss. Cell. 75:1993;729-739.
33. Scherer S., Davis R.W. Replacement of chromosome segments with altered DNA sequences in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76:1979;491-4955.
34. Schild D. Suppression of a new allele of the yeast RAD52 gene by overexpression of RAD51, mutations in srs2 and ccr4 or mating-type heterozygosity. Genetics. 140:1996;115-127.
35. Schwartz D., Cantor C. Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulse field gradient gel electrophoresis. Cell. 37:1984;67-75.
36. F. Sherman, G.R. Fink, J.B. Hicks, Methods of Yeast Genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1982.
37. Southern E.M. Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J. Mol. Biol. 98:1975;503-517.
38. Stinchcomb S., Mann C., Davis R.W. Centromeric DNA from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Mol. Biol. 158:1982;157-179.
39. Sugawara N., Haber J.E. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12:1992;563-575.
40. Sugawara N., Ivanov E.L., Fishman-Lobell J., Ray B., Wu X., Haber J.E. DNA structure-dependent requirements for yeast RAD gene in gene conversion. Nature (London). 373:1995;84-86.
41. Szostak J.W., Orr-Weaver T.L., Rothstein R., Stahl F.W. The double-strand break model for recombination. Cell. 33:1983;25-35.
42. Yan Y.X., Schiestl R.H., Prakash L. Mating-type suppression of the DNA-repair defect of the yeast rad6Δ mutation requires the activity of genes in the RAD52 epistasis group. Curr. Genetics. 28:1995;8-12.
43. J.H. Zar, Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.