Fertility potential of individual sperm donors

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 147-150

  Al Inany, Hesham G ^a   Dunselman, Gerard A J ^b   Dumoulin, John C M ^b   Maas, Jacques W M ^b   Evers, Johannes L H ^b  

^a Clinical Research Fellow   (Egypt)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cryopreservation; Donor fecundability; Frozen semen; Semen quality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CRYOPRESERVATION; DONOR; FERTILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECIPIENT; SEMEN ANALYSIS; SPERM; THAWING;

EID: 0033046502     PISSN: 03787346     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000010082     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Hummel WP, Talbert LM: Current management of a donor insemination program. Fertil Steril 1989;51:919-930.
2. Brotherton T: Cryopreservation of human semen. Arch Androl 1990;25:181-195.
3. Schroeder-Jenkins M, Rothmann SA: Causes of donor rejection in a sperm banking program. Fertil Steril 1989;51:903-906.
4. American Fertility Society: Guidelines for therapeutic donor insemination: Sperm. Fertil Steril 1994;62(suppl 1):101-104.
5. Enginsu ME, Pieters MHEC, Dumoulin JCM, Evers JLH, Geraedts JPM: Male factor as determinant of in-vitro-fertilization outcome. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1136-1140.
6. Katzorke T, Propping D, Tauber DF: Results of donor artificial insemination in 415 couples. Int J Fertil 1981;26:260-266.
7. Kovacs G, Baker G, Burger H, De Kretser D, Lording D, Lee J: Artificial insemination with cryopreserved donor semen: A decade of experience. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988;95:354-360.
8. Mahadevan MM, Trounson AO: Effect of cryoprotective media and dilution methods on the preservation of human spermatozoa. Andrologia 1983;15:355-366.
9. Metz C: Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 1978;8:283-298.
10. Mahadevan MM, Trounson AO, Milne B, Leeton J: Influence of semen and donor factors on success rate of artificial insemination with frozen semen. Clin Reprod Fertil 1982;1:185.
11. Edvinsson A, Bergman P, Steen T, Milsson S: Characteristics of donor semen and cervical mucous at the time of conception. Fertil Steril 1983;39:327-332.
12. David G, Czyglik F, Mayux M, Schwartz D: The success of AID and semen characteristics: Study on 1,489 cycles and 192 ejaculates. Int J Androl 1980;3:613.
13. Marshburn PB, McIntire D, Carr BR, Byrd W: Spermatozoal characteristics from fresh and frozen donor semen and their correlation with fertility outcome after intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1992;58:179-186.
14. McGowan M, Baker G, Kovacs G, Rennie G: Selection of high fertility donors for artificial insemination programmes. Clin Reprod Fertil 1983;2:269-274.
15. Thorneycroft IH, Bustillo M, Marik J: Donor fertility in an artificial insemination program. Fertil Steril 1984;41:144-145.
16. Francavilla F, Romano R, Santucci R, Poccia G: Effect of sperm morphology and motile sperm count on outcome of intrauterine insemination in oligozoospermia and/or asthenozoospermia. Fertil Steril 1990;53:892-897.
17. Byrd W, Bradshaw K, Carr B, Edman C, Odom J, Ackerman G: A prospective randomised study of pregnancy rates following intrauterine and intracervical insemination using frozen donor sperm. Fertil Steril 1990;53:521-527.
18. Aitken RJ, Baker HW, Irvine DS: On the nature of semen quality and infertility; in The diagnosis of male infertility by semen quality. Hum Reprod 1995;10:247-248.
19. Schwartz D, Laplanche A, Jouannet P, David G: Within-subject variability of human semen in regard to sperm count, volume, total number of spermatozoa and length abstinence. J Reprod Fertil 1979;57:391-395.
20. Macleod IC, Irvine DS: The predictive value of computer-assisted semen analysis in the context of a donor insemination programme. Hum Reprod 1995;10:580-586.