The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of two-dimensional motion signals with barber-pole stimuli

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 915-932

  Castet, Eric ^a   Charton, Virgile ^a   Dufour, André ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG   (France)

Author keywords

Aperture problem; Extrinsic signals; Integration; Intrinsic Signals; Motion processing of features; Occlusion; Perception of direction; Two dimensional motion signal; Unpaired regions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DIRECTIONAL VISION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL DETECTION; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISION DISPARITY;

EID: 0033045508     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00146-1     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson B.L., Julesz B. A theoretical analysis of illusory contour formation in stereopsis. Psychology Review. 102:1995;705-743.
2. Anderson B.L., Nakayama K. Toward a general theory of stereopsis: binocular matching, occluding contours, and fusion. Psychology Review. 101:1994;414-445.
3. Anderson B.L. The role of partial occlusion in stereopsis. Nature. 367:1994;365-368.
4. Beutter B.R., Mulligan J.B., Stone L.S. The barber-plaid illusion: plaid motion is biased by elongated apertures. Vision Research. 36:1996;3061-3075.
5. Castet E., Wuerger S. Perception of moving lines: interactions between local perpendicular signals and 2D motion signals. Vision Research. 37:1997;705-720.
6. Castet E., Charton V., Dufour A. The extrinsic/intrinsic classification of motion signals is a high-level process. Perception. 26:1997;87.
7. Castet E., Dufour A., Bonnet C. Disambiguation of 1D motion signals in the barber-pole. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37:1996;737.
8. Castet E., Lorenceau J., Shiffrar M., Bonnet C. Perceived speed of moving lines depends on orientation, length, speed and luminance. Vision Research. 14:1993;1921-1936.
9. Chey J., Grossberg S., Mingolla E. Neural dynamics of motion grouping: from aperture ambiguity to object speed and direction. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 14:1997;2570-2594.
10. Girgus J.J., Rock I., Egatz R. The effect of knowledge of reversibility on the reversibility of ambiguous figures. Perception and Psychophysics. 22:1977;550-556.
11. Hildreth, E. (1984). The measurement of visual motion. MIT Press, Cambridge.
12. Kooi F.L. Local direction of edge motion causes and abolishes the barber pole illusion. Vision Research. 33:1993;2347-2351.
13. Liden L., Mingolla E. Monocular occlusion cues alter the influence of terminator motion in the barber pole phenomenon. Vision Research. 38:1998;3883-3898.
14. Lamouret I., Lorenceau J., Droulez J. A computational account of the perceived direction and speed of moving tilted lines. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science Supplement. 37:1996;516.
15. Lorenceau J., Shiffrar M. The influence of terminators on motion integration across. Vision Research. 32:1992;263-273.
16. Lorenceau J., Shiffrar M., Wells N., Castet E. Different motion sensitive units are involved in recovering the direction of moving lines. Vision Research. 33:1993;1207-1217.
17. Marr D., Ullman S. Directional selectivity and its use in early visual processing. Proceedins of the Royal Society of London. B211:1981;151-180.
18. Mulligan J.B. Anisotropy in an ambiguous kinetic depth effect. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 9:1992;521-529.
19. Nakayama K., Shimojo S. Da Vinci stereopsis: depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points. Vision Research. 30:1990;1811-1825.
20. Nakayama K., Silverman G.H. The aperture problem II: spatial integration of velocity information along contours. Vision Research. 28:1988;747-753.
21. Nowlan S.J., Sejnowski T.J. A selection model for motion processing in area MT of primates. Journal of Neuroscience. 15:1995;1195-1214.
22. Peterson M.A., Hochberg J. Opposed-set measurement procedure: a quantitative analysis of the role of local cues and intention in form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology and Human Perception and Performance. 9:1983;183-193.
23. Power R.P., Moulden B. Spatial gating effects on judged motion of gratings in apertures. Perception. 21:1992;449-463.
24. Rock I., Mitchener K. Further evidence of failure of reversal of ambiguous figures by uninformed subjects. Perception. 21:1992;39-45.
25. Rubin N., Hochstein S. Isolating the effect of 1D motion signals on the perceived direction of moving 2D objects. Vision Research. 33:1993;1385-1396.
26. Scott-Brown K.C., Heeley D.W. Topological arrangement affects the perceived speed of tilted lines in horizontal translation. Investigative Ophthalmology andf Visual Science. 36:1995;261.
27. Scott-Brown K.C., Heeley D.W. Random perturbation of the length or position of horizontally drifting tilted lines affects their perceived speed. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37:1996;744.
28. Scott-Brown K.C., Heeley D.W. Terminator position affects the perceived speed of line segments tilted with respect to direction of motion. Perception. 25:1996;36.
29. Shapley R., Rubin N. Marked effects of global orientation on appearance and perceived direction of motion. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. 37:1996;737.
30. Shiffrar M., Li X., Lorenceau J. Motion integration across different image features. Vision Research. 35:1995;2137-2146.
31. Shiffrar M., Pavel M. Percepts of rigid motion across and within apertures. Journal of Experimental Psychology and Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;74-761.
32. Shimojo S., Silverman G., Nakayama K. Occlusion and the solution to the aperture problem for motion. Visual Research. 29:1989;619-626.
33. Stoner G.R., Albright T.D. Image segmentation cues in motion processing: implications for modularity in vision. Journal of Cognition Neuroscience. 5:1993;129-149.
34. Stoner G.R., Albright T.D., Ramachandran V.S. Transparency and coherence in human motion perception. Nature. 344:1990;153-155.
35. Trueswell J.C., Hayhoe M.M. Surface segmentation mechanisms and motion perception. Vision Ressearch. 33:1993;313-328.
36. Wallach H. Ueber visuell wahrgenommene bewegungrichtung. Psychologische Forschung. 20:1935;325-380.
37. Wuerger S., Shapley R., Rubin N. On the visually perceived direction of motion by Hans Wallach: 60 years laterm. Perception. 25:1996;1317-1367.