Attitudes of medical faculty physicians about taking occupational history

Medical Education

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 466-467

  Çimrin, Arif H ^a,b   Sevinc, Can ^a   Kundak, Isil ^a   Ellidokuz, Hülya ^a   Iti, Oya ^a  

^a DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Department of Internal Medicine ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

Attitudes of health personnel; Cross sectional studies; Diagnosis; Evaluation studies; Hospital medical staff; Hospitals, teaching; Medical history taking; Medical records; Methods; Occupational diseases

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MEDICAL RECORDS; MEDICAL STAFF, HOSPITAL; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES;

EID: 0033039559     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00366.x     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. Landrigan PJ, Baker DB. The recognition and control of occupational disease. JAMA 1991;266:676-80.
2. The Occupational and Environmental Health Committee of the American Lung Association of San Diego and Imperial Counties. Taking the occupational history. Ann Intern Med 1983;99:641-50.
3. State Institute of Statistics, Prime Ministry Republic of Turkey. Turkish Statistical Yearbook. Turkey: Ankara Printing Division; 1996.