Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995)

Analytica Chimica Acta

Volumn 391, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 105-126

  Currie, Lloyd A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Analytical methods; Detection; Nomenclature; Quantification capabilities

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; CHEMISTRY; DRUG IDENTIFICATION; NOMENCLATURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ASSAY; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 0033039021     PISSN: 00032670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-2670(99)00104-X     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Eisenhart C. Realistic evaluation of the precision and accuracy of instrument calibration systems. J. Res. NBS. 67C:1963;161.
2. Horwitz W. IUPAC Commission on analytical nomenclature, Nomenclature for sampling in analytical chemistry. Pure Appl. Chem. 62:1990;1193.
3. Currie L.A., Svehla G. IUPAC Commission on analytical nomenclature, Recommendations for the presentation of results of chemical analysis. Pure Appl. Chem. 66:1994;595.
4. A.L. Wilson, Performance characteristics of analytical methods, Talanta 17 (1970) 21, 31.
5. Wilson A.L. Performance characteristics of analytical methods. Talanta. 20:1973;725.
6. Wilson A.L. Performance characteristics of analytical methods. Talanta. 21:1974;1109.
7. ISO, International Vocabulary of Basic and General Terms in Metrology, International Organization for Standardization (1993).
8. IUPAC, "Orange Book", H. Freiser, G.H. Nancollas (Eds.), Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature, 1st ed., 1978, 2nd ed., 1987, Blackwell, Oxford.
9. M. Parkany, Parameters and Definitions, Second International Symposium on the Harmonization of Collaborative Analytical Studies, 1984.
10. ISO Guide 35, Certification of Reference Materials - General and Statistical Principles, International Organization for Standardization, 1989.
11. ISO Guide 33, Uses of Certified Reference Materials for the Assessment of a Measurement Procedure, International Organization for Standardization, 1989.
12. Currie L.A. The limitations of models and measurements as revealed through chemometric intercomparison. J. Res. NBS. 90:1985;409.
13. M.H. Zweig, Establishing clinical detection limits of laboratory tests, in: Currie (Ed.), Detection in Analytical Chemistry: Importance, Theory and Practice, Chapter 8, ACS Symposium Series 361, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1988.
14. Giacomo P. Expression of experimental uncertainties. Metrologia. 17:1981;69.
15. ISO, Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty, International Organization for Standardization, 1993.
16. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Clin. Chim. Acta 98 (1979) 129.
17. International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, Pure Appl. Chem. 51 (1979) 2451.
18. OIML, Vocabulary of Legal Metrology, International Organization of Legal Metrology (1978).
19. J.K. Taylor, Principles of Quality Assurance of Chemical Measurements, NBSIR 85-3105, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1985.
20. M. Natrella, Experimental Statistics, NBS Handbook 91, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1963.
21. K. Heydorn, Neutron Activation Analysis for Clinical Trace Element Research, Chapter 5 (Precision), Chapter 6 (Accuracy), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1985.
22. IAEA, Quality assurance in biomedical neutron activation analysis, Anal. Chim. Acta 165 (1984) 1.
23. L.A. Currie (Ed.), Detection in Analytical Chemistry: Importance, Theory, and Practice, Chapter 1, ACS Symposium Series 361, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1988.
24. ISO Standard 3534-1993, Statistics - Vocabulary and Symbols, International Organization for Standardization, 1993.
25. ISO Standards Handbook 3, Statistical Methods (1989).
26. R. Parr, H. Houtermans, K. Schaerf, in Computers in Activation Analysis and Gamma-ray Spectroscopy, US Department of Energy, CONF-780421 (1979) 544.
27. Hopke P.K., Massart D.L. Reference data sets for chemometrical methods testing. Chem. Intell. Lab. Syst. 19:1993;35.
28. Currie L.A. Limits for qualitative detection and quantitative determination. Anal. Chem. 40:1968;586.
29. P.-Th. Wilrich, M. Parkany, L.A. Currie, ISO-IUPAC, Limits of Detection: Nomenclature Harmonization Meeting, Washington, DC (1993).
30. E. Hartmann, Erfassungsvermögen von Analysenverfahren, Fresenius' Z. Anal. Chem. 335 (1989) 954.
31. L.A. Currie, The many dimensions of detection in chemical analysis, with special emphasis on the one-dimensional calibration curve, in: D. Kurtz (Ed.), Trace Residue Analysis: Chemometric Estimations of Sampling, Amount, and Error, Chapter 5, vol. 284, ACS Symposium Series, 1985, p. 49.
32. ASTM, Standard Practice for Interlaboratory Quality Control Procedures and a Discussion on Reporting Low-Level Data, ASTM Standard D 4210-89, American Society for Testing and Materials (1989).
33. C. Liteanu, I. Riča, Statistical Theory and Methodology of Trace Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1980.
34. L.A. Currie, Detection: international update, and some emerging di-lemmas involving calibration, the blank, and multiple detection decisions, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Environmetrics and Chemometrics, Las Vegas, NV, 1995, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 37 (1997) 151.
35. Kaiser H. Zur Definition der Nachweisegrenze, der Garantiegrenze und der dabei benutzten Begriffe. Z. Anal. Chem. 216:1966;80.
36. Kaiser H. Zur Definition von Selektivität, Spezifität und Emfindlichkeit von Analysenverfahren. Z. Anal. Chem. 260:1972;252.
37. D.L. Massart, B.G.M. Vandeginste, S.N. Deming, Y. Michotte, L. Kaufman, Chemometrics: A Textbook, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1988.
38. W.J. Dixon, F.J. Massey, Introduction to Statistical Analysis, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
39. Vangel M.G. Confidence Intervals for a Normal Coefficient of Variation. Am. Stat. 15:1996;21-26.
40. L.A. Currie, Sources of Error and the Approach to Accuracy in Analytical Chemistry, I.M. Kolthoff, P.J. Elving (Eds.), Treatise on Analytical Chemistry, vol. I, Chapter 4, 1978.
41. W.J. Youden, Uncertainties in calibration, in: H.H. Ku (Ed.), Precision Measurement and Calibration, Chapter I-5, NBS Spec. Publ. 300, US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1969.
42. AOAC: Guidelines for Interlaboratory Collaborative Study Procedure to Validate Characteristics of a Method of Analysis, J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem. 67 (1984) 433.
43. ASTM: Standard Terminology for Statistical Methods, E 456-83a, 1984 Annual Book of Standards, Section 14, p. 402; and E 691-79, Standard Procedure for Conducting an Interlaboratory Test Program to Determine the Precision of Test Methods, ibid., p. 556.
44. ASTM: Standard Terminology for Statistical Methods, E 456-83a, 1984 Annual Book of Standards, Section 14, p. 402; and E 691-79, Standard Procedure for Conducting an Interlaboratory Test Program to Determine the Precision of Test Methods, ibid., p. 556.
45. Mandel J., Paule R.C. Interlaboratory evaluation of a material with unequal numbers of replicates. Anal. Chem. 42:1970;1194.
46. Horwitz W., Parkany M. IUPAC Commission on analytical nomenclature, Nomenclature for interlaboratory analytical studies. Pure Appl. Chem. 66:1994;1903.
47. Danzer K., Currie L.A. Guidelines for Calibration in Analytical Chemistry: Part I. "Fundamentals and single component calibration," (IUPAC Recommendations 1998). Pure & Appl. Chem. 70(4):1998;993-1014.
48. IUPAC, J. Inczédy, T. Lengyel, A.M. Ure, A. Gelencsér, A. Hulanicki (Eds.), Compendium of Analytical Nomenclature, 3rd ed., Blackwell, Oxford, 1998.