Curriculum renewal and a process of care curriculum for teaching clerkship students

Family Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 391-397

  Rogers, John ^a   Dains, Joyce ^a   Corboy, Jane ^a   Chang, Tai ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; GENERAL PRACTICE; LEARNING; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; MODEL; TEACHING;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; JOB DESCRIPTION; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; OFFICE VISITS; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 0033038497     PISSN: 07423225     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Petersdorf RG, Turner KS. Medical education in the 1990s and beyond: a view from the United States. Acad Med 1995;70:S41-S47.
2. Regan-Smith MG. "Reform without change:" update, 1998. Acad Med 1998;73:505-7.
3. Marsland DW, Wood M, Mayo F. Content of family practice. Part I. Rank order of diagnoses by frequency. Part II. Diagnoses by disease category and age/sex distribution. J Fam Pract 1976;3:37-67.
4. Rosenblatt RA, Cherkin DC, Schneeweiss R, et al. The structure and content of family practice: current status and future trends. J Fam Pract 1982;15(4):681-772.
5. Schneeweiss R, Rosenblatt RA, Cherkin DC, et al. Diagnosis clusters: a new tool for analyzing the content of ambulatory medical care. Med Care 1983;21:105-22.
6. Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Jaen CR, et al. Illuminating the "black box" -a description of 4.454 patient visits to 138 family physicians. J Fam Pract 1998;46:377-89.
7. Medalie JH. Family medicine principles and application. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1978.
8. Rivo ML, Saultz JW, Wartman SA, DeWitt TG. Defining the generalist physician's training. JAMA 1994;271(19):1499-504.
9. National Board of Medical Examiners. United States medical licensing examination, step 3, design and practice model, version 2.3. Philadelphia: National Board of Medical Examiners, 1998.
10. LaDuca A, Taylor DD, Hill IK. The design of a new physician licensure examination. Eval Health Prof 1984;7(2):115-40.
11. Rogers JC, Spann SJ. Problem solving in family medicine. In: Rakel RE, ed. Essentials of family practice, second edition. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders, 1998:108-21.
12. Miller WL. Routine, ceremony, or drama: an exploratory field study of the primary care clinical encounter. J Fam Pract 1992;34:289-96.
13. Schwiebert LP, Aspy CB. Didactic content and teaching methodologies on required allopathic US family medicine clerkships. Fam Med 1999;31(2):95-100.
14. Schwiebert LP, Ramsey CN, Davis A. Standardizing the clinical content of a third-year family medicine clerkship. Fam Med 1993;25:257-61.
15. Working Committee to Develop Curricular Guidelines for a Third-Year Family Medicine Clerkship. Curricular guidelines for a third-year family medicine clerkship. Kansas City, Mo: Society of Teachers of Family Medicine, 1990.
16. Bardes CL, Colliver JA, Alonso DR, Swartz MH. Validity of standardized patient examination scores as an indicator of faculty observer ratings. Acad Med 1996;71(1):S82-S83.
17. Kiob DA. Self-scoring learning-style inventory. Boston: Hay/McBer Training Resources Group, 1985.
18. Whitman N. Learning and teaching styles: implications for teachers of family medicine. Fam Med 1996;28(5):321-5.
19. Swartz MH, Colliver JA, Bardes CL, Charon R, Fried ED, Moroff S. Validating the standardized patient assessment administered to medical students in the New York City consortium. Acad Med 1997;72(7):619-26.