The synthetic utility of the hypercoordination of boron and aluminum

Chemistry - A European Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 829-833

  Maruoka, Keiji ^a   Ooi, Takashi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Aluminum; Boron; Chelation; Coordination modes; Synthetic methods

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM; BORON;

ARTICLE; CHELATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPLEX FORMATION; COORDINATION; LOW TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; REACTION ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033038203     PISSN: 09476539     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1521-3765(19990301)5:3<829::aid-chem829>3.0.co;2-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. E. Negishi, Organometallics in Organic Synthesis, John Wiley, New York, 1980.
2. M. Santelli, J.-M. Pons, Lewis Acids and Selectivity in Organic Synthesis, CRC, Boca Raton, 1995.
3. D. Y. Lee, J. C. Maetin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 5745.
4. a) C. W. Heitsch, C. E. Nordman, P. W. Parry, Inorg. Chem. 1963, 2, 508;
5. b) G. Palenick, Acta Crystallogr. 1964, 77, 1573;
6. c) I. R. Beattie, G. A. Ozin, J. Chem. Soc. A, 1968, 2373;
7. d) F. R. Bennett, F. M. Elms, M. G. Gardiner, G. A. Koutsantonis, C. L. Raston, N. K. Roberts, Organometallics 1992, 11, 1457;
8. e) G. Muller, J. Lachmann, A. Rufinska, Organometallics 1992, 11, 2970;
9. f) M. D. Fryzuk, G. R. Giesbrecht, G. Olovsson, S. J. Rettig, Organometallics 1996, 15, 4832.
10. D. F. Clemens, H. H. Sisler, W. S. Brey, Jr., Inorg. Chem. 1966, 5, 527.
11. H. Schmidbaur, S. Lauteschlager, G. Muller, J. Organometal. Chem. 1985, 281, 25. For this argument, see ref. [4e].
12. M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem. 1984, 96, 542; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 556.
13. M. T. Reetz, Angew. Chem. 1984, 96, 542; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1984, 23, 556.
14. D. R. Lide, CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 78th ed., CRC, New York, 1997-1998.
15. For the synthetic utility of forming strong Al-F bonds, see: a) G. H. Posner, J. W. Ellis, J. Ponton, J. Fluorine Chem. 1981, 19, 191;
16. b) G. H. Posner, S. R. Haines, Tetrahedron Lett. 1985, 26, 1823.
17. T. Ooi, N. Kagoshima, K. Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 5754.
18. 2, see: F. Tabusa, T. Yamamda, K. Suzuki, T. Mukaiyama, Chem. Lett. 1984, 405.
19. The similar upfield effect is observed in several metal complexes of fluorinated macrocycles: H. Plenio, R. Diodone, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 356.
20. 27Al NMR chemical shifts depend heavily on the ligands and structural types of organoaluminum compounds, and on the coordination number of the Al atom. However, as a general tendency, the higher coordination number of the Al atom in organoaluminum compounds causes the more upfield shift. See also: M. R. P. van Vliet, P. Buysingh, G. van Koten, K. Vrieze, B. Kojic-Prodic, A. L. Spek, Organometallics 1985, 4, 1701.
21. 27Al NMR chemical shifts depend heavily on the ligands and structural types of organoaluminum compounds, and on the coordination number of the Al atom. However, as a general tendency, the higher coordination number of the Al atom in organoaluminum compounds causes the more upfield shift. See also: M. R. P. van Vliet, P. Buysingh, G. van Koten, K. Vrieze, B. Kojic-Prodic, A. L. Spek, Organometallics 1985, 4, 1701.
22. 27Al NMR chemical shifts depend heavily on the ligands and structural types of organoaluminum compounds, and on the coordination number of the Al atom. However, as a general tendency, the higher coordination number of the Al atom in organoaluminum compounds causes the more upfield shift. See also: M. R. P. van Vliet, P. Buysingh, G. van Koten, K. Vrieze, B. Kojic-Prodic, A. L. Spek, Organometallics 1985, 4, 1701.
23. T. Ooi, M. Furuya, K. Maruoka, Chem. Lett. 1998, 817.
24. T. Ooi, N. Kagoshima, D. Uraguchi, K. Maruoka, Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 7105.
25. a) D. A. Evans, J. V. Nelson, T. R. Taber, Top. Stereochem. 1982, 13, 1;
26. b) S. Masamune, W. Choy, J. S. Peterson, L. R. Sita, Angew. Chem. 1985, 97, 1; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1;
27. b) S. Masamune, W. Choy, J. S. Peterson, L. R. Sita, Angew. Chem. 1985, 97, 1; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1985, 24, 1;
28. c) M. Braun, Angew. Chem. 1987, 99, 24; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 24;
29. c) M. Braun, Angew. Chem. 1987, 99, 24; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 24;
30. d) A. S. Franklin, I. Paterson, Contemp. Org. Synth. 1994, 317.
31. For a recent example, see: A. K. Ghosh, M. Onishi, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2527, and references therein.
32. R. Noyori, S. Murata, M. Suzuki, Tetrahedron 1981, 37, 3899.
33. T. Ooi, D. Uraguchi, N. Kagoshima, K. Maruoka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5327.
34. M. T. Reetz, K. Kesseler, S. Schmidtberger, B. Wenderoth, R. Steinbach, Angew. Chem. 1983, 95, 1007; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1983, 22, 989; Angew. Chem. Suppl. 1983, 1511.
35. M. T. Reetz, K. Kesseler, S. Schmidtberger, B. Wenderoth, R. Steinbach, Angew. Chem. 1983, 95, 1007; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1983, 22, 989; Angew. Chem. Suppl. 1983, 1511.
36. M. T. Reetz, K. Kesseler, S. Schmidtberger, B. Wenderoth, R. Steinbach, Angew. Chem. 1983, 95, 1007; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1983, 22, 989; Angew. Chem. Suppl. 1983, 1511.
37. M. Murakata, T. Jono, Y. Mizuno, O. Hoshino, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11713.
38. D. P. Heller, D. R. Goldberg, W. D. Wulff, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 10551.
39. E. Keller, N. Veldman, A. L. Spek, B. L. Feringa, Tetrahedron Asymmetry, 1997, 8, 3403.
40. T. Arai, H. Sasai, K. Yamaguchi, M. Shibasaki, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 441.