Pollen source, fruit set and xenia in mandarins

Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 82-86

  Wallace, H M ^a,c   Lee, L S ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE SUNSHINE COAST   (Australia)

^b SOUTHERN CROSS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTIVAR; FRUIT; MANDARIN; ORGANOGENESIS; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; POLLEN;

APIS MELLIFERA;

EID: 0033037416     PISSN: 14620316     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14620316.1999.11511077     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. CHAPMAN, J. C. (1980). Ethephon for fruit thinning of Imperial and Beauty of Glen Retreat mandarins in the Central Burnett district, Queensland. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 20, 508-12.
2. ETI, S. and STOSSER, R. (1992). Pollen tube growth and development of ovules in relation to fruit set in mandarins, cv. 'Clementine' (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Acta Horticulturae, 321, 621-5.
3. FREE, J. B. (1993). Rutaceae. In: Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, London, 479-85.
4. GARCIA-PAPI, M. A. and GARCIA-MARTINEZ, J. L. (1984). Fruit set and development in seeded and seedless Clementine mandarins. Scientia Horticulturae, 22, 113-9.
5. HEARN, C. J., REECE, P. C. and FENTON, R. (1968). Effects of pollen source on fruit characteristics and set of four citrus hybrids. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 81, 94-8.
6. HEARN, C J., REECE, P. C. and FENTON, R. (1969). Self incompatibility and the effects of different pollen sources upon fruit characteristics of four citrus hybrids. Proceedings of the First International Citrus Symposium, 1, 183-7.
7. KAHN, T. L. and DEMASON, D. A. (1986). A quantitative and structural comparison of Citrus pollen tube development in cross-compatible and self-incompatible gynoecia. Canadian Journal of Botany, 64, 2548-55.
8. KAHN, T. L. and DEMASON, D. A. (1988). Citrus pollen tube development in cross-compatible gynoecia, self-incompatible gynoecia and in vitro. Canadian Journal of Botany, 66, 2527-32.
9. KHO, Y. O. and BAER, J. (1968). Observing pollen tubes by means of fluorescence. Euphytica, 17, 298-302.
10. KREZDORN, A. H. (1967). The influence of seeds and pollen source on size of fruits. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 80, 37-43.
11. KREZDORN, A. H. and ROBINSON, F. A. (1958). Unfruitfulness in the Orlando tangelo. Proceedings of the Florida State Horticultural Society, 21, 86-91.
12. LUPO, A., EISIKOWITCH, D. and BROSH, P. (1991). Pollination in Murcott cultivar of Citrus (Rutaceae), the influence on seed number and productivity. Acta Horticulturae, 288, 275-7.
13. 14C-metabolites in citrus during flowering and fruiting. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 102, 709-14.
14. SYKES, S. R. and LEWIS, W. J. (1996). Comparing Imperial mandarin and Silverhill satsuma mandarin as seed parents in a breeding program aimed at developing new seedless citrus cultivars for Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 36, 731-8.
15. SYKES, S. R. and POSSINGHAM, J. V. (1992). The effect of excluding insect pollinators on seediness of Imperial mandarin fruits. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 32, 409-11.
16. TALON, M., ZACARIAS. L. and PRIMO-MILLO, E. (1992). Gibberellins and parthenocarpic ability in developing ovaries of seedless mandarins. Plant Physiology, 99, 1575-81.
17. VITHANAGE, V. (1991). Effect of different pollen parents on seediness and quality of 'Ellendale' tangor. Scientia Horticulturae, 48, 253-60.