Four key questions that identify severe disability

Archives of Disease in Childhood

Volumn 80, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 67-68

  Fooks, Jean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Disability; Outcome; Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

FRESH FROZEN PLASMA;

ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HANDICAPPED CHILD; HEALTH VISITOR; HUMAN; PEDIATRICIAN; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 0033037341     PISSN: 00039888     EISSN: 14682044     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/adc.80.1.67     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. 1 UK Collaborative ECMO Trial Group. UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Lancet 1996;348:75-82.
2. 2 The Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative Trial Group. A randomized trial comparing the effect of prophylactic early fresh frozen plasma, gelatin or glucose on early mortality and morbidity. Eur J Pediatr 1996;155:580-8.
3. 3 Fooks J, Fritz S, Tin W, et al. A comparison of two methods of follow-up in a trial of prophylactic volume expansion in preterm babies. Paediatr Perimat Epidemiol 1998;12:199-216.
4. 4 Johnson A, Goddard O, Ashurst H. Is late walking a marker of morbidity? Arch Dis Child 1990;65:486-7.
5. 5 Neligan G, Prudham D. Potential value of four early developmental milestones in screening children for increased risk of Latwer retardation. Dev Med Child Neurol 1969;11: 123-31.
6. 6 Zaman SS, Khan NZ, Islam S, et al. Validity of the "ten questions" for screening serious childhood disability: results from urban Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol 1990;19: 613-20.