International trade and the sustainability footprint: A practical criterion for its assessment

Ecological Economics

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 75-97

  Proops, John L R ^a   Atkinson, Giles ^b   Schlotheim, Burkhard Frhr V ^a   Simon, Sandrine ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

International trade; Managed economy; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SUSTAINABILITY;

EID: 0033036873     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00030-5     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adger, N., 1992. Accounting for natural resource degradation in Zimbabwe, CSERGE Working Paper GEC92-32, CSERGE University of East Anglia and University College, London.
2. Alfsen, K., Bye, T., Lorentsen, L., 1987. Natural Resource Accounting and Analysis: The Norwegian Experience 1978-1986. Sosiale og okonomiske, Studier 65, Statistik Sentralbyra, Oslo.
3. Asheim G.B. Net National Product as an indicator of sustainability. Scand. J. Econ. 96:1994;257-265.
4. Bartelmus, P., Lutz, E., Schweinfest, S., 1993. Integrated environmental and economic accounting: a case study for Papua New Guinea, in: Lutz, E. (Ed.), Toward Improved Accounting for the Environment, pp. 108-143.
5. Born, A., 1992. Development of natural resource accounts: physical and monetary accounts for crude oil and natural gas reserves in Alberta, Discussion Paper No. 11, National Accounts and Environment Division. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
6. Bryant C., Cook P. Environmental accounting. Economic Trends. 469:1992;99-122.
7. Common, M., 1990. Natural resource accounting and sustainability. Paper presented to a Joint Centre for Economic Policy Research. Resource Assessment Commission Conference, Canberra.
8. Cruz, W., Repetto, R., 1992. Environmental effects of stabilisation and structural adjustment programs: The Philippines case, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
9. Daly, H.E., Cobb, J.W., 1989. For the Common Good, Beacon Press, Boston.
10. Denison, E., 1962. The sources of economic growth in the US, Committee for Economic Development, Washington, DC.
11. Faber M., Proops J.L.R. Natural resource rents, economic dynamics and structural change: a capital theoretic approach. Ecol. Econ. 8:1993;17-44.
12. Faucheux, S., Froger, G., 1993. Le revenu soutenable peut-il etre un indicateur de soutenabilite? (Can national sustainable income be an indicator of sustainability?). C3ED, Paris.
13. Hamilton, K., 1991. Proposed treatment of environmental and natural resources in the national accounts, National Accounts and Environment Division Discussion Paper No. 7. Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
14. Hammond, A., Adriaanse, A., Rodenburg, E., Bryant, D., 1995. Environmental indicators: A systematic approach to measuring and reporting on environmental policy performance in the context of sustainable development. World Resource Institute, Baltimore.
15. Hartwick J.M. Intergenerational equity and investing of rents from exhaustible resources. Am. Econ. Rev. 66:1977;972-974.
16. Hartwick, J.M., Lindsay, R., 1989. NNP and economic depreciation of exhaustible resource stocks, Department of Economics Discussion Paper No. 741. Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
17. Henderson, H., 1978. Creating Alternative Futures: The End of Economics. Putnam, New York.
18. Hicks, J.R., 1946. Value and Capital, 2nd ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
19. HMSO, 1996. Indicators of sustainable development for the UK. HMSO, London.
20. INSEE, 1986. Les compts satellits de l'environnement: Methods et resultats. Les collections de l'INSEE 514. Serie C, No. 130. Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economique, Paris.
21. Leontief W. Quantitative input-output relations in the economic system of the United States. Rev. Econ. Stat. 18:1936;105-125.
22. Mäler K.-G. National accounts and environmental resources. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1:1991;1-15.
23. Miller, R.E., Blair, P.D., 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
24. Newcombe, K., 1991. An economic justification for rural afforestation: the case of Ethiopia, in: Schramm, G., Warford, J. (Eds.), Environmental Management and Environmental Development. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
25. Nordhaus, W.D., Tobin, J., 1972. Is growth obsolete?, in: National Bureau of Economic Research, Economic Growth, General Theories 96, New York.
26. OECD, 1995. Environmental indicators. Organisation Economique de Cooperation et de Developpement, Paris.
27. Pearce D.W., Atkinson G. Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of weak sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 8:1993;103-108.
28. Pearce, D.W., Markandya, A., Barbier, E., 1989. Blueprint for a Green Economy. Earthscan, London.
29. Pearce, D.W., Markandya, A., Barbier, E., 1990. Sustainable Development. Earthscan, London.
30. Peskin, H.M., 1989. Accounting for natural resource depletion and degradation in developing countries, Environment Department Working Paper No. 13. World Bank, Washington, DC.
31. Pezzey, J., 1989. Economic analysis of sustainable growth and sustainable development, Environment Department Working Paper, UK.
32. Pezzey, J., 1994. The optimal sustainable depletion of non-renewable resources. University College London, mimeo.
33. 2 Emissions: A Comparative Input-Output Study for Germany and the UK. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg.
34. Repetto, R., 1989. Wasting assets. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
35. Seroa da Motta, R., Young, C., 1991. Natural resources and national accounts: sustainable income from mineral extraction. Mimeo, Instituto de Pequisa Economia Aplicada (IPEA), Rio de Janeiro.
36. Seroa da Motta, R., May, P.H., 1992. Loss in forest resource values due to agricultural land conversion in Brazil. Mimeo, Instituto de Pequisa Economia Aplicada (IPEA), Rio de Janeiro.
37. Soloranza, R., 1991. Accounts overdue: natural resource depreciation in Costa Rica. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
38. Solow R.M. On the intergenerational allocation of natural resources. Scand. J. Econ. 88:1986;141-149.
39. Stahmer, C., Seifert, E.K., 1994. Valuation concept for calculating green GDP: complementary not exclusive. Paper presented at the Int. Symp. Models of Sustainable Development. Exclusive or Complementary Approaches of Sustainability? March 1994, Paris.
40. United Nations, 1991. Statistical Yearbook. United Nations, New York.
41. United Nations, 1992. National accounts statistics: analysis of main aggregates and detailed tables, 1990. United Nations, New York.
42. UNSTAT, 1993. Handbook of national accounting. Integrated environmental and economic accounting. Studies in Methods, Ser. F, No. 61. UNSTAT, New York.
43. Van Tongeren, J., Schweinfest, S., Lutz, E., Gomez Luna, M., Guillen, F., 1991. Integrated environmental and economic accounting: a case study for Mexico, in: Lutz, E. (Ed.) Toward Improved Accounting for the Environment, pp. 85-107.
44. Wackernagel, M., Rees, W.E., 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. New Society, Gabriola Island, BC.
45. WCED, 1987. Our Common Future, World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
46. World Bank, 1985. World Development Reports. World Bank, Washington, DC.
47. World Bank, 1987. World Development Reports. World Bank, Washington, DC.
48. World Bank, 1990. World Development Reports. World Bank, Washington, DC.
49. World Bank, 1991. World Tables. World Bank, Washington, DC.