A comparison of knee and function score of patients lost to follow-up with patients reattending a prospective total knee arthroplasty study;Ein vergleich der klinischen und funktionellen ergebnisse von ausgeschiedenen mit in einer prospektiven knieendoprothesenstudie verbliebenen patienten

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 137, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 57-60

  König, Achim ^a   Schreiber, Bettina ^b   Rader, Ch ^b   Scheidler, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Drop out; Function score; Knee score; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RELIABILITY; SURVIVAL RATE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 0033035530     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1037037     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. 1 Debrunner, A. M.: Langzeitresultate in der Orthopädie. Enke, Stuttgart 1990
2. 2 Dorey, F., H. C. Amstutz: The validity of survivorship analysis in total joint arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. 71-A (1989) 544-548
3. 3 Drake, B. G., C. M. Callahan, R. S. Dittus, J. G. Wright: Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes. J. Arthropl. 9 (1994) 409-417.
4. 4 Ewald, F. C.: The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin. Orthop. 248 (1989) 9-12
5. 5 Hassenpflug, J., K. Harten, H. J. Hahne, K. Hobeck, C. Holland, U. Maronna: Ist die Implantation von Kniegelenkscharnierendoprothesen heute noch vertretbar? Z. Orthop. 126 (1988) 398-407
6. 6 Hassenpflug, J., H. J. Hahne, J. Hedderich: Gedanken zur Anwendung der ,Life-Table-Methode' in der Orthopädie. Z. Orthop. 130 (1992) 223-229
7. 7 Insall, J. N., L. D. Dorr, R. D. Scott, W. N. Scott: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin. Orthop. (1989) 13-14
8. 8 Knutson, K, S. Lewold, O. Robertsson, L. Lidgren: The Swedish knee arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop. Scand. 65 (1994) 375-386
9. 9 König, A., M. Scheidler, C. Rader, J. Eulert: The need for a dual rating in total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 345 (1997) 161-167
10. 10 Lettin, A. W, H. S. Ware, R. W. Morris: Survivorship analysis and confidence intervals. An assessment with reference to the Stanmore total knee replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. 73-B (1991) 729-31
11. 11 Malchau, H.: On the importance of stepwise introduction of new hip implant technology. Salomongruppen, Göteborg 1995
12. 12 Nelissen, R. G. H. H., R. Brand., P. M. Rozing: Survivorship analysis in total condylar knee arthroplasty, J. Bone Joint Surg. 74-A (1992) 383-389
13. 13 Paavolainen, P., P. Slätis, M. Hämäläinen, T. Visuri: Long-Term results of total joint arthroplasty. National Agency for Medicines Helsinki 1995
14. 14 Rand, J. A., D. M. Ilstrup: Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. 73-A (1991) 397-409
15. 15 Ryd, L, J. Kärrholm, P. Ahlvin and the Score Assessment Group: Knee scoring systems in gonarthrosis. Acta Orthop. Scand. 68 (1997) 41-45
16. 16 Schumacher, M.: Probleme der statistischen Auswertung von Überlebenszeitstudien. Z. Orthop. 127 (1989) 428-432
17. 17 Scuderi, G. R., J. N. Insall, R. E. Windsor, M. C. Moran: Survivorship of cemented knee replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg. 71-B, (1989) 798-803
18. 18 Statistisches Jahrbuch 1997 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Statistisches Bundesamt Wiesbaden 1997