The Quest for the Truth: A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Experts in Litigation

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 5-18

  Kinley, David ^a   Rose, Alan ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; COURT; ETHICS; EXPERT WITNESS; FORENSIC SCIENCE; FRANCE; HUMAN; LAW SUIT; LEGAL ASPECT; TRAINING;

EID: 0033034878     PISSN: 00450618     EISSN: 1834562X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00450619909411214     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. JW Langbein. ‘The German Advantage in Civil Procedure”(1985) 52 University of Chicago Law Review 823,836.
2. RM Jackson. The Machinery of Justice in England (1st cdn: 1940). p.66.
3. GL Davies, “A Blueprint for Reform: Some Proposals of the Litigation Reform Commission and their Rationale” (1995-1996) 5 Journal of Judicial Administration 201,207.
4. G Edmond & D Mercer, “Keeping ‘Junk’ History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science out of the Courtroom: Problems with the Reception of Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc” (1997) 20 UNSWU 48.