Improved imaging of carotid artery bifurcation using helical computed tomographic angiography

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 178-183

  Cinat, Marianne E ^a   Pham, Hanh ^b   Vo, David ^a   Gordon, Ian ^a   Wilson, Samuel E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VA LONG BEACH HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; CAROTID ARTERY BIFURCATION; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0033032808     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s100169900238     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Schwartz RB, Jones KM, Chernoff DM, et al. Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Radiology 1992;185:513-519.
2. Dillon EH, van Leeuwen MS, Fernandez MA, et al. CT angiography: application to the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Radiology 1993;189:211-219.
3. Marks MP, Napel S, Jordan JE, et al. Diagnosis of carotid artery disease: preliminary experience with maximum-intensity-projection spiral CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:1267-1271.
4. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;163:517-523.
5. Link J, Brossman J, Grabener, et al. Spiral CT angiography and selective digital subtraction angiography of internal carotid artery stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:89-184.
6. Link J, Brossman J, Penselin J, et al. Common carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary results of CT angiography and color-coded duplex sonography compared with digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;168:361-365.
7. Cinat M, Lane CT, Pham H, et al. Helical CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg, 1998;28:290-300.
8. Masaryk TJ, Obuchowski NA. Noninvasive carotid imaging: caveat emptor. Radiology 1993;186:325-331.
9. Steinke W, Kloetzsch C, Hennerici M. Carotid artery disease assessed by color Doppler flow imaging: correlation with standard Doppler sonography and angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:1061-1068.
10. Erickson SJ, Mewissen MW, Foley WD, et al. Stenosis of the internal carotid artery: assessment using color Doppler imaging compared with angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:1299-1305.
11. Patel MR, Klufas RA, Kim D, et al. MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation: artifacts and limitations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;162:1431-1437.
12. Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, et al. Artifacts in maximum intensity projection display of MR angiograms. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;154:623-629.
13. Riles TS, Eidelman EM, Litt AW, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, conventional angiography, and duplex scanning. Stroke 1992;23:341-346.