The case against micrographically controlled skin surgery

Acta Dermato-Venereologica

Volumn 79, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 2-3

  Shuster, Sam ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURGERY; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SKIN SURGERY; SKIN TUMOR; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

CARCINOMA, BASAL CELL; HUMANS; MOHS SURGERY; SKIN NEOPLASMS;

EID: 0033032692     PISSN: 00015555     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (4)

1. 1. Mohs FE. Chemosurgery. A microscopically controlled method of cancer excision. Arch Surg 1941; 44: 279-295.
2. 2. Lawrence CM. Mohs surgery of basal cell carcinoma - a critical review. Br J Plastic Surg 1993; 46: 599-606.
3. 3. Koplin L, Zarem HA. Recurrent basal cell carcinoma. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 65: 656-664.
4. 4. Roenigk RK, Ratz JL, Bailin PL, Wheeland RG. Trends in the presentation and treatment of basal cell carcinomas. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1986; 12: 860-865.