The relationship between trough height, feather cover and behaviour of laying hens in modified cages

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 55-64

  Freire, R ^a   Walker, A ^b   Nicol, C J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b ADAS BOXWORTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chicken housing; Feather pecking; Welfare

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033031430     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00244-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Allen J., Perry G.C. Feather pecking and cannibalism in a caged layer flock. Br. Poultry Sci. 16:1975;441-451.
2. Animal Welfare Institute, 1987. Factory farming: the experiment that failed. The Animal Welfare Institute, Washington, DC.
3. Appleby M.C., Hogarth G.S., Anderson J.A., Hughes B.O., Whittemore C.T. Performance of a deep litter system for egg production. Br. Poultry Sci. 29:1988;735-751.
4. Appleby M.C., Smith S.F., Hughes B.O. Nesting, dustbathing and perching in laying hens in cages: effects of design on behaviour and welfare. Br. Poultry Sci. 34:1993;835-847.
5. Bessei, W., Reiter, K., Schwarzenberg, A., 1997. Measuring pecking towards a bunch of feathers in individually housed hens as a means to select against feather pecking. In: Koene, P., Blokhuis, H.J. (Eds.), Proceedings Fifth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. Ponsen and Looyen, Wageningen, pp. 74-76.
6. Gentle M.J., Hunter L.N. Physiological and behavioural responses associated with feather removal in Gallus gallus var. domesticus. Res. Vet. Sci. 50:1990;95-101.
7. Glatz P.C., Barnett J.L. Effect of perches and solid sides on production, plumage and foot condition of laying hens housed in conventional cages in a naturally ventilated shed. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36(3):1996;269-275.
8. Hughes B.O. The frequency of neck movements in laying hens and the improbability of cage abrasion causing feather wear. Br. Poultry Sci. 19:1978;289-293.
9. Hughes B.O. Feather damage in hens caged individually. Br. Poultry Sci. 21:1980;149-154.
10. Hughes, B.O., 1985. Feather loss as a problem: how does it occur? In: Wegner, R.M. (Ed.), Proceedings Second European Seminar on Poultry Welfare. World's Poultry Science Association, Celle, pp. 177-188.
11. Hughes, B.O., 1993. Origins and development of modified cages for laying hens. In: Sherwin, C.M. (Ed.), Modified Cages for Laying Hens. Proceedings of a symposium (1993), UFAW, Herts, pp. 1-11.
12. Lindberg A.C., Nicol C.J. Dustbathing in modified battery cages: is sham dustbathing an adequate substitute? Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 55:1997;113-128.
13. McLean K.A., Baxter M.R., Michie W. A comparison of the welfare of laying hens in battery cages and in a perchery. Res. Dev. Agric. 3:1986;93-98.
14. Ouart M.D., Adams A.W. Effects of cage design and bird density on layers: 1. Productivity, feathering and nervousness. Poultry Sci. 61:1982;1606-1613.
15. Peguri A., Coon C. Effects of feather coverage and temperature on layer performance. Poultry Sci. 72(7):1993;1318-1329.
16. Sokal, R.R., Rohlf, F.J., 1995. Biometry, 3rd edn. Freeman, New York.
17. Tauson R. Plumage condition in SCWL laying hens kept in conventional cages of different designs. Acta Agricult. Scand. 34:1984;221-230.
18. Tullet S.G., Macleod M.G., Jewitt T.R. The effects of partial defeathering on energy metabolism in the laying fowl. Br. Poultry Sci. 21:1980;241-245.
19. van Liere D.W., Kooijman J., Wieptkema P.R. Dustbathing behaviour of laying hens related to quality of dustbathing material. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26:1990;127-141.
20. Vestergaard, K.S., Kruijt, J.P., Hogan, J.A., 1993. Feather pecking and its relation to dustbathing in the Red Junglefowl. In: Savory, C.J., Hughes, B.O. (Eds.), Proceedings Fourth European Symposium on Poultry Welfare. UFAW, Potters Bar, p. 315.
21. Webster A.B., Hurnik J.F. Behaviour production and well-being of laying hens: 1. Effects of movable roosts, relationship of cage mates and genetic stock. Poultry Sci. 69(12):1990;2118-2127.