Forgetting as a cause of incomplete reporting of sexual and drug injection partners

Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 166-176

  Brewer, Devon D ^a   Garrett, Sharon B ^a   Kulasingam, Shalini ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHAMPHETAMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE TRANSMISSION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; INTERVIEW; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ABUSE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; RECALL; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0033030370     PISSN: 01485717     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199903000-00008     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Benenson AS. Control of communicable diseases manual. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1995:577.
2. Fenton KA, Peterman TA. HIV partner notification: taking a new look. AIDS 1997; 11:1535-1546.
3. Rothenberg RB, Potterat JJ. Partner notification for STD/HIV. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Mardh P-A, et al., eds. Sexually transmitted diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
4. Toomey KE, Cates WJ. Partner notification for the prevention of HIV infection. AIDS 1989; 3:S57-S62.
5. West GR, Stark KA. Partner notification for HIV prevention: a critical reexamination. AIDS Educ Prev 1997; 9:68-78.
6. Friedman SR, Neaigus A, Jose B, et al. Sociometric risk networks and risk for HIV infection. Am J Public Health 1997; 87:1289-1296.
7. Klovdahl AS, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, Muth JB, Muth SQ, Darrow WW. Social networks and infectious disease: the Colorado Springs study. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38:78-88.
8. Haraldsdottir S, Gupta S, Anderson RM. Preliminary studies of sexual networks in a male homosexual community in Iceland. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1992; 5:374-381.
9. Neaigus A, Friedman SR, Goldstein M, Ildefonso G, Curtis R, Jose B. Using dyadic data for a network analysis of HIV infection and risk behaviors among injecting drug users. In: Needle RH, Coyle SL, Genser SG, Trotter RT, eds. Social networks, drug abuse, and HIV transmission. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1995:20-37.
10. Potterat JJ, Rothenberg RB, Muth SQ. Network structural dynamics and infectious disease propagation. Int J STD AIDS. In press.
11. Rothenberg RB, Potterat JJ. Strategies for management of sex partners. In: Holmes KK, Mardh PA, Sparling PF, Wiesner PJ, eds. Sexually transmitted diseases. New York: McGraw-Hill Information Services Company, 1990:1081-1086.
12. North RL, Rothenberg KH. Partner notification and the threat of domestic violence against women with HIV infection. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:1194-1196.
13. Rogers SJ, Tross S, Doino-Ingersol J, Weisfuse I. Partner notification with HIV-infected drug users: results of formative research. AIDS Care 1998; 10:415-429.
14. Spencer N, Raevsky C, Wolf F, Simms C. Sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic client opinions on HIV partner notification. Abstract W.A.P. 85. Paper presented at: Fifth International Conference on AIDS; June 4-9, 1989; Montreal, Quebec.
15. Ennes HJ, Bennett TG. The contact-education interview. Am J Syphilis Venereal Dis 1945; 29:647-666.
16. Crystal S, Dengelegi L, Beck P, Dejowski E. AIDS contact notification: initial program results in New Jersey. AIDS Educ Prev 1990;2: 284-295.
17. Landis SE, Schoenbach VJ, Weber DJ, et al. Results of a randomized trial of partner notification in cases of HIV infection in North Carolina. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:101-106.
18. Latkin CA, Vlahov D, Anthony JC. Socially desirable responding and self-reported HIV infection risk behaviors among intravenous drug users. Addiction 1993; 88:517-526.
19. Capinski TZ, Urbanczyk J. Value of re-interviewing in contact tracing. Br J Venereal Dis 1970; 46:138-140.
20. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Notification of syringe-sharing and sex partners of HIV-infected persons. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1995; 44:202-204.
21. Friedman SR, Jose B, Neaigus A, et al. Consistent condom use in relationships between seropositive injecting drug users and sex partners who do not inject drugs. AIDS 1994; 8:357-361.
22. Buchwald J, Omura J, Larsen GI, Heely PI. The venereal disease contact interview. Public Health Rep 1960; 75:1000-1006.
23. Curtis R, Friedman SR, Neaigus A, Jose B. Goldstein M, Ildefonso G. Street-level drug markets: network structure and HIV risk. Soc Networks 1995; 17:229-249.
24. Fisher RP, Quigley KL. Applying cognitive theory in public health investigations: enhancing food recall with the cognitive interview. In: Tanur JM, ed. Questions about questions: inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1992:155-169.
25. McLaws M-L, Oldenburg B, Ross MW, Cooper DA. Sexual behavior in AIDS-related research: reliability and validity of recall and diary measures. J Sex Res 1990; 27:265-281.
26. Andrus JK, Fleming DW, Harger DR, et al. Partner notification: can it control epidemic syphilis? Ann Intern Med 1990; 112:539-543.
27. Friedman SR. Promising social network research results and suggestions for a research agenda. In: Needle RH, Coyle SL, Genser SG, Trotter RT, eds. Social networks, drug abuse, and HIV transmission. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 1995:196-215.
28. Rothenberg RB, Potterat JJ, Woodhouse DE, Darrow WW, Muth SA, Klovdahl AS. Choosing a centrality measure: epidemiologic correlates in the Colorado Springs study of social networks. Soc Networks 1995; 17:273-297.
29. Hagan H, McGough JP, Thiede H, Weiss NS, Hopkins S, Alexander ER. Syringe exchange and risk of infection with Hepatitis B and C viruses. Am J Epidemiol. In press.
30. Prohaska V, Brown NR, Belli RF. Forward telescoping: the question matters. Memory 1998; 6:455-465.
31. Hunt N. Incidence of needlestick injuries among people who inject. Addiction 1997; 92:219-221.
32. Normand J, Vlahov D, Moses LE. Preventing HIV Transmission: The Role of Sterile Needles and Bleach. Washington, D C: National Academy Press, 1995:24-27.
33. Kral AH, Bluthenthal RN, Erringer EA, Lorvick J, Edlin BR. "Doctors" and "patients": risk behaviors among IDUs who give injections to or receive injections from other drug users. Addiction. In press.
34. Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park: Sage, 1991.
35. Seattle/King Co. Dept. of Pub. Health. HIV/AIDS quarterly epidemiology report, second quarter 1998. Seattle: Seattle/King Co. Dept. of Public Health and Washington St. Dept. of Health, 1998.
36. Wasserman RF, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
37. Kretzschmar M, Wiessing LG. Modelling the spread of HIV in social networks of injecting drug users. AIDS 1998; 12:801-811.
38. Potterat JJ, Meheus A, Gallwey J. Partner notification: operational considerations. Int J STD AIDS 1991; 2:411-415.
39. Brown WJ, Donohue JF, Axnick NW, Blount JH, Ewen NH, Jones OG. Syphilis and other venereal diseases. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970:47.
40. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Venereal Diseases Branch field manual. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control. Venereal Disease Branch, 1962.
41. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Venereal disease epidemiology. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control, 1973.
42. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). HIV partner notification standards and guidelines. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control, 1992.
43. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Guidelines for STD/HIV control program operations. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control, 1992.
44. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). STD employee development guide. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control, 1992.
45. Fiumara NJ. Describing a contact of venereal diseases. Am J Syphilis Gonorrhea Venereal Dis 1949; 33:380-388.
46. Hoffman RE, Spencer NE, Miller LA. Comparison of partner notification at anonymous and confidential HIV test sites in Colorado. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 1995; 8:406-410.
47. Bradshaw WVJ. Homosexual syphilis epidemic. Tex Med J 1961; 57:907-909.
48. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Alternative case-finding methods in a crack-related syphilis epidemic - Philadelphia. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 1991; 40:77-80.
49. Doering VE, Elste G, Lehmann-Franken E, Kleinecke R. Verbesserung der Infektionsquellenforschung bei Erkrankten an Gonorroe durch Wiederholungsbefragungen. Dermatologische Monatsshrift 1979; 165:41-45.
50. Ghani AC, Ison CA, Ward H, et al. Sexual partner networks in the transmission of sexually transmitted diseases: an analysis of gonorrhea cases in Sheffield, UK. Sex Transm Dis 1996; 23:498-503.
51. Hammar H, Ljungberg L. Factors affecting contact tracing of gonorrhea. Acta Dermato-venereologica 1972; 52:1081-1086.
52. Kaufman RE, Blount JH, Jones OG. Current trends in syphilis. Public Health Rep 1974; 3:175-196.
53. Parker M, Ward H, Day S. Sexual networks and the transmission of HIV in London. J Biosoc Sci 1998; 30:63-83.
54. Smith DC, Brumfield WAJ. Tracing the transmission of syphilis. JAMA 1933; 101:1955-1957.
55. Stuart J. Venereal disease contact investigation. J Venereal Dis Info 1951; 18:242-247.
56. Webster B, Shelley EI. Studies in the epidemiology of primary and secondary syphilis in New York City. Am J Public Health 1941; 31:1199-1205.
57. Wykoff RF, Heath CW, Hollis S, et al. Contact tracing to identify human immunodeficiency virus infection in a rural community. JAMA 1988; 259:3563-3566.
58. Brown W. To what extent is memory measured by a single recall? J Exp Psychol 1923; 6:377-382.
59. Fisher RP, Geiselman RE. Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: The cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C.Thomas, 1992.
60. Fisher RP, Geiselman RE, Amador M. Field test of the cognitive interview: enhancing the recollection of actual victims and witnesses of crime. J Appl Psychol 1989; 74:722-727.
61. Fisher RP, McCauley MR, Geiselman RE. Improving eyewitness testimony with the Cognitive Interview. In: Ross D, Reed JD, Toglia M, eds. Adult eyewitness testimony: current trends and development. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994:245-269.
62. Brewer DD. The social structural basis of the organization of persons in memory. Hum Nature 1995; 6:379-403.