Visual lateralization and monocular sleep in the domestic chick

Cognitive Brain Research

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 451-463

  Mascetti, Gian Gastone ^a   Rugger, Marina ^a   Vallortigara, Giorgio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Arian brain; Asymmetry; Chick; Gallus gallus; Imprinting; Lateralization; Sleep

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CHICKEN; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SLEEP; VISION;

AGING; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, DOMESTIC; CHICKENS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; IMPRINTING (PSYCHOLOGY); POSTURE; SLEEP; SOCIAL ISOLATION; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISION, MONOCULAR;

EID: 0033027363     PISSN: 09266410     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0926-6410(98)00053-6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Amlaner C.J. Jr., Ball N.J. A synthesis of sleep in wild birds. Behaviour. 87:1983;85-119.
2. R.J. Andrew, Lateralization of emotional and cognitive function in higher vertebrates, with special reference to the domestic chick, in: J.-P. Ewert, R.R. Capranica, D.J. Ingle (Eds.), Advances in Vertebrate Neuroethology, Plenum, New York, 1983, pp. 477-505.
3. Andrew R.J. The development of visual lateralization in the domestic chick. Behav. Brain Res. 29:1988;201-209.
4. R.J. Andrew, The nature of behavioural lateralization in the chick, in: R.J. Andrew (Ed.), Neural and Behavioural Plasticity. The Use of the Chick as a Model, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991, pp. 536-554.
5. Andrew R.J. Left and right hemisphere memory traces: their formation and fate. Evidence from events during memory formation in the chick. Laterality. 2:1997;179-198.
6. Andrew R.J., Brennan A. The lateralization of fear behaviour in the male domestic chick: a developmental study. Animal Behaviour. 31:1985;1166-1176.
7. R.J. Andrew, M. Dharmaretnam, Lateralization and strategies of viewing in the domestic chick, in: H.P. Zeigler, H.-J. Bishof (Eds.), Vision, Brain, and Behavior in Birds, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993, pp. 319-332.
8. R.J. Andrew, J. Mench, C. Rainey, Right-left asymmetry of response to visual stimuli in the domestic chick, in: D.J. Ingle, M.A. Goodale, R.J. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of Visual Behaviour, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1982, pp. 225-236.
9. N.J. Ball, C.J. Amlaner, Jr., J.P. Shaffery, M.R. Opp, Asynchronous eye-closure and unihemispheric quiet sleep of birds, in: W.P. Koella, H. Shulz, F. Obàla, P. Visser (Eds.), Sleep '86, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 1988, p. 127.
10. Bateson P.P.G. Effect of similarity between rearing and testing conditions on chicks' following and avoidance responses. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 57:1964;100-103.
11. A. Bisazza, L.J. Rogers, G. Vallortigara, The origins of cerebral asymmetry: a review of evidence of behavioural and brain lateralization in fishes, amphibians, and reptiles, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 1997, in press.
12. Bolhuis J.J. Mechanisms of avian imprinting: a review. Biol. Rev. 66:1991;303-345.
13. J.L. Bradshaw, L.J. Rogers, The Evolution of Lateral Asymmetries, Language, Tool Use, and Intellect. Academic Press, New York, 1993, 480 pp. .
14. Deng C., Rogers L.J. Differential contributions of the two visual pathways to functional lateralization in chicks. Behav. Brain Res. 87:1997;173-182.
15. Deng C., Rogers L.J. Bilaterally projecting neurons in the two visual pathways of chicks. Brain Res. 794:1998;281-290.
16. Deng C., Rogers L.J. Organisation of the tectorotundal and SP/IPS-rotundal projections in the chick. J. Comp. Neurol. 394:1998;171-185.
17. Dharmaretnam M., Andrew R.J. Age- and stimulus-specific effects on the use of right and left eyes by the domestic chick. Anim. Behav. 48:1994;1395-1406.
18. Güntürkün O. Avian visual lateralization: a review. NeuroReport. 8:1997;R3-R11.
19. Horn G. Neural basis of recognition memory investigated through an analysis of imprinting. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 329:1990;133-142.
20. Horn G., Johnson M.H. Memory systems in the chick: dissociations and neuronal analysis. Neuropsychologia. 27:1989;1-22.
21. 3H ] MK-801 binding asymmetry in the IMHV region of dark-reared chicks is reversed by imprinting Brain Res. Bull. 37:1995;5-8.
22. B.J. McCabe, Hemispheric asymmetry of learning-induced changes, in: R.J. Andrew (Ed.), Neural and Behavioural Plasticity: The Use of the Domestic Chick as a Model, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991, pp. 262-276.
23. McKenzie R., Andrew R.J. Brief retention deficits associated with cyclically recurring left hemisphere events. Physiology and Behavior. 5:1996;1323-1329.
24. Miklòsi A., Andrew R.J., Dharmaretnam M. Auditory lateralization: shifts in ear use during attachment in the domestic chick. Laterality. 1:1996;215-224.
25. Nicol A.U., Brown M.W., Horn G. Neurophysiological investigations of a recognition memory system for imprinting in the domestic chick. Eur. J. Neurosci. 7:1995;766-776.
26. Rashid N., Andrew R.J. Right hemisphere advantages for topographical orientation in the domestic chick. Neuropsychologia. 27:1989;937-948.
27. Regolin L., Vallortigara G. Lateral asymmetries in the response to novel-coloured objects in the domestic chick: a developmental study. Behav. Process. 37:1996;67-74.
28. Rogers L.J. Lateralization of learning in chicks. Adv. Study Behav. 16:1986;147-189.
29. L.J. Rogers, Development of lateralization, in: R.J. Andrew (Ed.), Neural and Behavioural Plasticity: The Use of the Domestic Chick as a Model, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1991, pp. 507-535.
30. Rogers L.J. The molecular neurobiology of early learning, development, and sensitive periods, with emphasis on the avian brain. Mol. Neurobiol. 7:1993;161-187.
31. L.J. Rogers, The Development of Brain and Behaviour in the Chicken, CAB International, Wallingford, 1995.
32. Rogers L.J. Behavioural, structural and neurochemical asymmetries in the avian brain: a model system for studying visual development and processing. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 20:1996;487-503.
33. Rogers L.J., Anson J.M. Lateralization of function in the chicken forebrain. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 10:1979;679-686.
34. Rogers L.J., Chaffey G. Lateralized patterns of sleep activity in the developing chick brain. Proceedings of the Australian Neuroscience Society. 5:1994;95.
35. Rogers L.J., Ehrlich D. Asymmetry in the chicken forebrain during development and possible involvement of the supraoptic decussation. Neurosci. Lett. 37:1983;123-127.
36. S.P.R, Rose, The Making of Memory, From Molecules to Mind, Bantam Books, London, 1992.
37. Solodkin M., Cardona A., Corsi-Cabrera M. Paradoxical sleep augmentation after imprinting in the domestic chick. Physiol. Behav. 35:1985;343-348.
38. Vallortigara G. Behavioral asymmetries in visual learning of young chickens. Physiol. Behav. 45:1989;797-800.
39. Vallortigara G. Right hemisphere advantage for social recognition in the chick. Neuropsychologia. 30:1992;761-768.
40. Vallortigara G., Andrew R.J. Lateralization of response to change in a model partner by chicks. Anim. Behav. 41:1991;187-194.
41. Vallortigara G., Andrew R.J. Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick. Behav. Process. 33:1994;41-58.
42. Vallortigara G., Andrew R.J. Olfactory lateralization in the chick. Neuropsychologia. 32:1994;417-423.
43. Vallortigara G., Zanforlin M. A newborn chick's companion. Monitore Zoologico Italiano/Italian Journal of Zoology. 20:1986;63-73.
44. Vallortigara G., Zanforlin M., Cailotto M. Right-left asymmetry in position learning of male chicks. Behav. Brain Res. 27:1988;189-191.
45. Vallortigara G., Regolin L., Bortolomiol G., Tommasi L. Lateral asymmetries due to preferences in eye use during visual discrimination learning in chicks. Behav. Brain Res. 74:1996;135-143.
46. Vallortigara G., Andrew R.J., Sertori L., Regolin L. Sharply-timed behavioural changes during the first five weeks of life in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Bird Behav. 12:1997;29-40.
47. Workman L., Andrew R.J. Simultaneous changes in behaviour and in lateralization during the development of male and female domestic chicks. Anim. Behav. 38:1989;596-605.