A sensitivity analysis to guide research and management for Hector's dolphin

Biological Conservation

Volumn 90, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 183-191

  Martien, Karen K ^a   Taylor, Barbara L ^b   Slooten, Elizabeth ^c   Dawson, Steve ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SOUTHWEST FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Gillnet mortality; Hector's dolphin; Management objectives; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION STATUS; DOLPHIN; ENDEMIC SPECIES; POPULATION DECLINE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

NEW ZEALAND;

EID: 0033022001     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00020-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barlow J., Hanan D. An assessment of the status of harbor porpoise in Central California. Bjorge A., Donovan G.P. Biology of Phocoenids: a Collection of Papers. 1995;123-140 International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, UK.
2. Buckland S.T., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P., Laake J.L. Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. 1993;Chapman and Hall, New York.
3. Clark I.N., Major P.J., Mollett N. Development and implementation of New Zealand's ITQ management system. Marine Resource Economics. 5:1988;325-349.
4. Dawson S.M. Incidental catch of Hector's dolphins in inshore gillnets. Marine Mammal Science. 7:1991;283-295.
5. Dawson, S.M., Slooten, E., 1988. Hector's dolphin, Cephalorhynchus hectori: distribution and abundance. Reports at the International Whaling Commission (special issue 9), pp. 315-324.
6. Dawson S.M., Slooten E. Conservation of Hector's dolphins: the case and process which led to the establishment of the Banks Peninsula Marine Mammal Sanctuary. Aquatic Conservation. 3:1993;207-221.
7. Department of Conservation and Ministry of Fisheries, 1994. Review of the Banks Peninsula Marine Mammal Sanctuary: a paper for public comment. Department of Conservation of Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Christchurch, New Zealand, Canterbury Conservancy miscellaneous report series no. 3.
8. Gilpin M.E., Soule M.E. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. Soule M.E. Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. 1986;19-34 Sinauer Associates Inc, Sunderland, MA.
9. Pichler F.B., Dawson S.M., Slooten E., Baker C.S. Geographic isolation of Hector's dolphin populations described by Mitochondrial DNA sequences. Conservation Biology. 12:1998;676-682.
10. Pulliam H.R. Sources, sinks, and population regulation. The American Naturalist. 132:1988;652-661.
11. Reilly S.B., Barlow J. Rates of increase in dolphin population size. Fisheries Bulletin. 84:1986;527-533.
12. Shaffer M.L. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. BioScience. 31:1981;131-134.
13. Slooten E., Lad F. Population biology and conservation of Hector's dolphin. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 69:1991;1701-1707.
14. Smith T.D., Polachek T. Analysis of a simple model for estimating historical population sizes. Fisheries Bulletin. 76:1979;771-779.
15. Taylor, B.L., Wade, P.R., 1999. "Best" abundance estimates and best management: why they are not the same. In: Ferson, S., Burgman, M. (Eds.), Methods for Conservation Biology. Springer, New York.
16. Waples R.S. Genetic considerations in recovery efforts for Pacific salmon. Conservation Biology. 8:1994;884-886.