Photobiological aspects of sunscreen re-application

Australasian Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 14-18

  Pruim, Bert ^a   Green, Adèle ^a  

^a QIMR BERGHOFER MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Photobiology; Skin; Sunburn; Sunscreening agents

Indexed keywords

4 METHOXYCINNAMIC ACID 2 ETHYLHEXYL ESTER; AQUASUN; AVOBENZONE; SUNSCREEN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PROPHYLAXIS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION PROTECTION; SKIN PROTECTION; SUNBURN; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION;

ADMINISTRATION, TOPICAL; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; DRUG ADMINISTRATION SCHEDULE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUEENSLAND; RADIATION DOSAGE; SKIN; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUNBURN; SUNSCREENING AGENTS; ULTRAVIOLET RAYS;

EID: 0033020771     PISSN: 00048380     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-0960.1999.00309.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, J'olume 55, Solar and Ultraviolet Radiation. Lyon cedex: IARC Press, 1992.
2. Green A, Battistutta D, Hart V et al. Skin cancer in a subtropical Australian population: Incidence and lack of association with occupation. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1996; 144: 1034-40.
3. Giles G, Thursfield V. Trends in skin cancer in Australia. Cancer Forum 199G; 20: 188-91.
4. Staples M, Marks R, Giles G. Trends in the incidence of nonmelanocytic skin cancer (NMSC) treated in Australia 1985-1995: Are primary prevention programs starting to have an effect? Int. J. Cancer 1998; 78: 144-8.
5. Patel NP, Highton A, Moy RL. Properties of topical sunscreen formulations: A review. J. Dennatol. Surg. Oncol 1992; 18: 316-20.
6. Standards Australia (AusL Fed. Govt). Sunscreen Products Evaluation and Classification, 3rd edn. Homcbush, NSW: Standards Australia, 1993.
7. Department of Health and Human Services - Food and Drug Administration. Sunscreen Drug Products for Over-the-Counter Human Use; Tentative Final Monograph; Proposed Rule. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1993; 28 194-302.
8. Hayclen CGJ, Roberts MS, Benson 1IAE. Systemic absorption of sunscreen after topical application. Lancet 1997; 350: 863-4.
9. Odio MR, Veres DA, Goodman JJ et al. Comparative efficacy of sunscreen reapplication regimens in children exposed to ambient sunlight Photodermatol. Pholoimmunol. Pholomed. 1994; 10:118-25.
10. Hoppe U. Factors determining effectiveness of sunscreen agents. In: Breuer M (ed.) Cosmetic Science, London: Academic Press, 1980; 147-79.
11. Brown S, Diffey BL. The effect of applied thickness on sunscreen protection: In vivo and in vitro studies. Photocliem. Pliolobiol. 198G; 44: 509-13.
12. O'iS'eill JJ. Effect of film irregularities on sunscreen efficacy. }. Pharm. Sei. 1984; 73: 888-91.
13. Palhak MA, Fitzpatrick TB. Preventive treatment of sunburn, dermatoheliosis, and skin cancer with sun-protective agents. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, Wolff K et al (eds). Dermatology- in General Medicine, 4th edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 1689-717.
14. N'orris PG, Gange R\V, Hawk JLM. Acute effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. In: Fitzpatrick TB, Eisen AZ, WollîK étal. (eds). Dermatology in General Medicine, 4th edn, New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1993; 1631-7.
15. Bech-Thomsen N, Wulf IIC. Sunbathcrs' application of sunscreen is probably inadequate to obtain the sun protection factor assigned to the preparation. Plwtodermatol. Plwtoimmunol. Photomcd. 1992; 9: 242-4.
16. Gottlieb A, Bourget T, Lowe IS'J, Sunscreens: Effects of amounts of application of sun protection factors. In: Lowe NJ (ed.) Physician's Guide to Sunscreens. New York: Marcel Dekkcr, Inc., 1991; 183-8.
17. Green A, Battistutta D, I lart V et al. The IS'ambour Skin Cancer and Actinic Eye Disease Prevention Trial: Design and baseline characteristics of participants. Control. Clin. Trials 1994; 15: 512-22.
18. Pruim WW. Photobiological and behavioural aspects of sunscreen re-application (Masters Thesis). Brisbane: University of Queensland, 1997.
19. Hostettler HU, Wall M, Ippen H. The variability of the protection factors for sunscrcening products. sJrzneimiltelforschung\Q78; 28: 2173-6.
20. Sayre RM, Agin PP, LeVce GJ, Marlowe E. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro testing of sunscreening formulas. Photocliem. Photobiol. 1979; 29: 559-66.
21. Sayre RM, Kaidbey KII. Reciprocity for solar simulators used in sunscreen testing. Photoderm. Pholoimmunol. Photomed. 1990; 7: 198-201.