Ethics, justice and women's health

International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Volumn 64, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 81-85

  Cook, R J ^a   Dickens, B M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER SCREENING; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MATERNAL CARE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 0033020218     PISSN: 00207292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00205-7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Article 12.
2. Williams A. Economics, society and healthcare ethics. In: Gillon R, editor. Principles of healthcare ethics. Chichester and New York: Wiley, 1994:829-842.
3. World Health Organization/UNICEF. Revised 1990 estimates of maternal mortality. A new approach. WHO/UNICEF, April 1996.
4. Starrs A. Safe motherhood action agenda: priorities for the next decade: report on the safe motherhood technical consultation 18-23 October 1997, New York: Family Care International.
5. Pinotti J. Integral approach to women's health. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Sao Paulo University Medical School, 1998.
6. Pinotti J. Integral approach to women's health. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Sao Paulo University Medical School, 1998:15.
7. Pinotti J. Integral approach to women's health. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Sao Paulo University Medical School, 1998:9.
8. United Nations. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Document A/Conf. 171/13. New York, 1994:Para. 8.21.
9. Velasquez Rodriguez Case (Honduras), 4 Inter-Amer. Court of Human Rights (ser.C) 92, Para 166 (1988).
10. Inter-Amer. Commission on human rights, Annual Report, 1980-1981 at 125, cited in Annual Report, 1989-1990, 187.
11. Paton v. United Kingdom, 3 Eur. H. R.Report 408, 1980.
12. U.N. GAOR human rights committee, para 5, U.N. Doc. CCPR/2 1/Rev.1, 1989.
13. U.N. GAOR human rights committee, para 5, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev. 1, 1989.
14. X v. United Kingdom, Application No. 7154, Decision 12 July 1978, European commission of human rights, decisions and reports 14:31-35. June 1979.
15. Tavares v. France, Application No. 16593/90, European commission of human rights. Decision on admissibility. 12 September 1991.
16. Convention on the Elimination of AU Forms of Discrimination Against Women, Article 12.
17. Plata MI. Reproductive rights as human rights: the Colombian case. In: Cook RJ, editor. Human rights of women: national and international perspectives. Philadelphia, Penn: University of Pennsylvania Press 1994:515-531.
18. Pitanguy J. From Mexico to Beijing: a new paradigm. Health and human rights, 1:454-460, 1995:458.
19. Concluding observations: Peru: Peru. 11/18/96. United Nations High Commission for Human Rights CCPR/C/79/Add 72, Para 15.
20. Concluding Observations: Peru: Peru. 11/18/96. United Nations High Commission for Human Rights CCPR/C/79/Add 72, Para 22.
21. Fathalla MF. Women's health an overview. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1994;46:105-118.
22. Atrash HK et al. Maternal mortality in developed countries: not just a concern of the past. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:700-705.
23. Starrs A. Safe motherhood action agenda: priorities for the next decade: report on the safe motherhood technical consultation 18-23 October 1997. New York: Family Care International, forthcoming 1998, at 16, 17.