Glucose production during an IVGTT by deconvolution: Validation with the tracer-to-tracee clamp technique

American Journal of Physiology - Endocrinology and Metabolism

Volumn 276, Issue 2 39-2, 1999, Pages

  Vicini, Paolo ^a,f   Zachwieja, Jeffrey J ^b,c   Yarasheski, Kevin E ^b   Bier, Dennis M ^d   Caumo, Andrea ^e   Cobelli, Claudio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^d BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^f University of Washington   (United States)

Author keywords

Mathematical model; Nonsteady state; Specific activity clamp; Tracer to tracee ratio

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; TRACER;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLAMP; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; GLUCONEOGENESIS; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; GLUCOSE INFUSION; HUMAN; INSULIN BLOOD LEVEL; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; INTRAVENOUS GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0033018078     PISSN: 01931849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.1999.276.2.e285     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Avogaro, A., P. Vicini, A. Valerio, A. Caumo, and C. Cobelli. The hot but not the cold minimal model allows precise assessment of insulin sensitivity in NIDDM subjects. Am. J. Physiol. 270 (Endocrinol. Metab. 33): E532-E540, 1996.
2. Best, J. D., J. Taborsky, Jr., J. B. Halter, and D. Porte, Jr. Glucose disposal is not proportional to plasma glucose level in man. Diabetes 30: 847-850, 1981.
3. Carson, E. R., C. Cobelli, and L. Finkelstein. The Mathematical Modeling of Metabolic and Endocrine Systems. New York: Wiley, 1983.
4. Caumo, A., and C. Cobelli. Hepatic glucose production during the labeled IVGTT: estimation by deconvolution with a new minimal model. Am. J. Physiol. 264 (Endocrinol. Metab. 27): E829-E841, 1993.
5. Caumo, A., A. Giacca, M. Morgese, G. Pozza, P. Micossi, and C. Cobelli. Minimal model of glucose disappearance: lessons from the labeled IVGTT. Diab. Med. 8: 822-832, 1991.
6. Cobelli, C., A. Mari, and E. Ferrannini. Non-steady state: error analysis of Steele's model and developments for glucose kinetics. Am. J. Physiol. 252 (Endocrinol. Metab. 15): E679-E689, 1987.
7. Cobelli, C., and G. Toffolo. Constant specific activity input allows reconstruction of endogenous glucose concentration in non-steady state. Am. J. Physiol. 258 (Endocrinol. Metab. 21): E1037-E1040, 1990.
8. Cobelli, C., G. Toffolo, D. M. Bier, and R. Nosadini. Models to interpret kinetic data in stable isotope tracer studies. Am. J. Physiol. 253 (Endocrinol. Metab. 16): E551-E564, 1987.
9. Cobelli, C., G. Toffolo, and D. M. Foster. Tracer-to-tracee ratio for analysis of stable isotope tracer data: link with radioactive kinetic formalism. Am. J. Physiol. 262 (Endocrinol. Metab. 25): E968-E975, 1992.
10. Cobelli, C., P. Vicini, G. Toffolo, and A. Caumo. The hot IVGTT minimal models: simultaneous assessment of disposal indices and endogenous glucose production. In: The Minimal Model Method and Determinants of Glucose Tolerance, edited by J. Lovejoy and R. N. Bergman. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press, p. 202-239, 1998. (Pennington Nutr. Ser.)
11. Cowan, J. R., and G. Hetenyi, Jr. Glucoregulatory responses in normal and diabetic dogs recorded by a new tracer method. Metab. Clin. Exp. 20: 360-372, 1971.
12. De Nicolao, G., G. Sparacino, and C. Cobelli. Nonparameteric input estimation in physiological systems: problems, methods, case studies. Automatica 33: 851-870, 1997.
13. Fick, A. Über die Messung des Blutquantums in den Herzventrikeln. Verhandl Phys. Med. Ges. Wurzburg 2: XVI, 1870.
14. Finegood, D. T., R. N. Bergman, and M. Vranic. Estimation of endogenous glucose production during hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic glucose clamps: comparison of unlabeled and labeled exogenous glucose infusates. Diabetes 36: 914-924, 1987.
15. Finegood, D. T., I. M. Hramiak, and J. Duprè. A modified protocol for estimation of insulin sensitivity with the minimal model of glucose kinetics in patients with insulin dependent diabetes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 70: 1538-1548, 1990.
16. Hales, C., and P. J. Randle. Immunoassay of insulin with insulin antibody precipitate. Biochem. J. 88: 137-146, 1963.
17. Jacquez, J. A. Theory of production rate calculations in steady and non-steady states and its application to glucose metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. 262 (Endocrinol. Metab. 25): E779-E790, 1992.
18. Norwich, K. N. Measuring rates of appearance in systems which are not in steady state. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 51: 91-101, 1973.
19. Overkamp, D., J. F. Gautier, W. Renn, A. Pickert, A. J. Scheen, R. M. Schmulling, M. Eggstein,† and P. J. Lefebvre. Glucose turnover in humans in the basal state and after intravenous glucose: a comparison of two models. Am. J. Physiol. 273 (Endocrinol. Metab. 36): E284-E296, 1997.
20. Radziuk, J., K. H. Norwich, and M. Vranic. Experimental validation of measurements of glucose turnover in nonsteady state. Am. J. Physiol. 234 (Endocrinol. Metab. Gastrointest. Physiol. 3): E84-E93, 1978.
21. Sparacino, G., and C. Cobelli. A stochastic deconvolution method to reconstruct insulin secretion rate after a glucose stimulus. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 435: 512-529, 1996.
22. Steele, R. Influence of glucose loading and of injected insulin on hepatic glucose output. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 82: 420-430, 1959.
23. Vicini, P., A. Caumo, and C. Cobelli. The hot IVGTT two compartment minimal model: indexes of glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity. Am. J. Physiol. 273 (Endocrinol. Metab. 36): E1024-E1032, 1997.
24. Vicini, P., G. Sparacino, A. Caumo, and C. Cobelli. Estimation of EGP after a glucose perturbation by nonparametric stochastic deconvolution. Comput. Methods Prog. Biomed. 52: 147-156, 1997.
25. Yang, Y. J., J. H. Youn, and R. N. Bergman. Modified protocols improve insulin sensitivity estimation using the minimal model. Am. J. Physiol. 253 (Endocrinol. Metab. 16): E595-E602, 1987.
26. Zierler, K. L. Theory of the use of arteriovenous concentration differences for measuring metabolism in steady and nonsteady states. J. Clin. Invest. 40: 2111-2125, 1961.