The effects of temperature and light integral on the phases of photoperiod sensitivity in Petunia x hybrida

Annals of Botany

Volumn 83, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 263-269

  Adams, S R ^a,b   Pearson, S ^a   Hadley, P ^a   Patefield, W M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Flowering; Juvenility; Light integral; Petunia; Petunia x hybrida; Photoperiod; Reciprocal transfer; Temperature

Indexed keywords

FLOWERING; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PHOTOSYNTHESIS;

PETUNIA; PETUNIA HYBRIDA; PETUNIA X HYBRIDA;

EID: 0033015370     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0817     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Adams SR, Hadley P, Pearson S. 1998a. The effects of temperature, photoperiod and photosynthetic photon flux on the time to flowering of Petunia 'Express Blush Pink'. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 123: 577-580.
2. Adams SR, Pearson S, Hadley P. 1998b. An appraisal of the use of reciprocal transfer experiments: Assessing the stages of photoperiod sensitivity in chrysanthemum cv. Snowdon (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.). Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 1405-1411.
3. Collinson ST, Ellis RH, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH. 1992. Durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of development to flowering in four cultivars of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Annals of Botanv 70: 339-346.
4. Ellis RH, Collinson ST, Hudson D, Patefield WM. 1992. The analysis of reciprocal transfer experiments to estimate the durations of the photoperiod-sensitive and photoperiod-insensitive phases of plant development: An example in soya bean. Annals of Botany 70: 87-92.
5. Ellis RH, Qi A, Craufurd PQ, Summerfield RJ, Roberts EH. 1997. Effects of photoperiod, temperature and asynchrony between thermoperiod and photoperiod on development to panicle initiation in sorgum. Annals of Botany 79: 169-178.
6. Genstat 5 Committee. 1993. Genstat 5 release 3 reference manual. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
7. Kaczperski MP, Carlson WH, Karlsson MG. 1991. Growth and development of Petunia × hybrida as a function of temperature and irradiance. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 116: 232-237.
8. Langton FA. 1977. The responses of early flowering chrysanthemums to daylength. Scientia Horticulturae 7: 277-289.
9. Langton FA. 1992. Interrupted lighting of chrysanthemums : monitoring of average daily light integral as an aid to timing. Scientia Horticulturae 49: 147-157.
10. McDaniel CN, Singer SR, Smith SME. 1992. Developmental states associated with the floral transition. Developmental Biology 153: 59-69.
11. Mead R. 1988. The design of experiments. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
12. O'Neill SD. 1992. The photoperiodic control of flowering: Progress toward the understanding of the mechanism of induction. Phytochemistry and Photobiology 56: 789-801.
13. Piringer AA, Cathey HM. 1960. Effect of photoperiod, kind of supplemental light and temperature on the growth and flowering of petunia plants. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 76: 649-660.
14. Roberts EH, Summerfield RJ, Muehlbauer FJ, Short RW. 1986. Flowering in lentil (Lens culinaris Medic): The duration of the photoperiodic inductive phase as a function of accumulated daylength above the critical photoperiod. Annals of Botany 58: 235-248.
15. Seeley JG, Weise AH. 1965. Photoperiodic response of garden and greenhouse chrysanthemums. Proceedings of the American Society of Horticultural Science 87: 464-471.
16. Vince-Prue D. 1975. Photoperiodism in plants. London: McGraw Hill.
17. Wang Z, Acock MC, Acock B. 1997. Photoperiod sensitivity during flower development of Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.). Annals of Botany 79: 129-132.
18. Wilkerson GG, Jones JW, Boote KJ, Buol GS. 1989. Photoperiodically sensitive interval in time to flower of soybean. Crop Science 29: 721-726.