Kielland vs. nonrotational forceps for the second stage of labor

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 511-517

  Krivak, Thomas C ^b   Drewes, Peter ^b   Horowitz, Gary M ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Cesarean section; Labor stage; Obstetrical forceps; Second

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FORCEPS; FORCEPS DELIVERY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; MECONIUM ASPIRATION; NEWBORN; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

APGAR SCORE; BIRTH INJURIES; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FACIAL INJURIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL; LABOR STAGE, SECOND; MECONIUM; OBSTETRICAL FORCEPS; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SCALP;

EID: 0033014689     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Danforth DN, Ellis AH: Midforceps delivery: A vanishing art? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1963;86:29-37
2. Hankins GDV, Rowe TF: Operative vaginal delivery: Year 2000. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:275-282
3. Dennen PC: Dennen's Forceps Deliveries. Philadelphia, FA Davis, 1989
4. Friedman EA: Midforceps delivery: No? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1987;30:93-105
5. Ruderman J, Carroll JC, Murray MA: Are physicians changing the way they practice obstetrics? Can Med Assoc J 1993; 148:409-415
6. Healy DL, Laufe LE: Survey of obstetric forceps training in North America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;151:54-58
7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Operative Vaginal Delivery. Washington, DC, ACOG, 1994
8. Hagadorn-Freathy AS, Yeomans ER, Hankins GDV: Validation of the 1988 ACOG forceps classification system. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:356-360
9. Carmona F, Martinez-Roman S, Manau D, et al: Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of low-forceps delivery according to the new criteria of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery in term pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:55-59
10. Gilstrap LC III, Hauth JC, Schiano S, et al: Neonatal acidosis and method of delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:681-685
11. Rubin L, Coopland AT: Kielland's forceps. Can Med Assoc J 1970;103:505-506
12. Robertson PA, Laros RK, Zhao RL: Neonatal and maternal outcomes in low-pelvic and mid-pelvic operative deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:1436-1444
13. Menticolou SM, Perlman M, Manning FA: High cervical spine injury in neonates delivered with forceps: Report of 15 cases. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:589-594
14. Tan KH, Sim R, Yam KL: Kielland's forceps delivery: Is it a dying art? Singapore Med J 1992;33:380-382
15. Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL: Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. New York, Churchill Livingstone, 1996
16. Megison JW: Save the Barton forceps. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82:313
17. Hankins GDV, Clark SL, Cunningham FG, et al: Operative Obstetrics. Norwalk, Connecticut, Appleton & Lange, 1995
18. Nozton FC, Bergsjo P, Cole S, et al: International collaborative effort (ICE) on birth weight, plurality, and infant mortality: IV. Differences in obstetrical delivery practice: Norway, Scotland, and the United States. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991;70:451-460
19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Professional Liability and Its Effectors: Report of a 1992 Survey of ACOG's Membership. Washington, DC, ACOG, 1992
20. Witter FR: Soft-cup vacuum extractors safely assist normal deliveries. Contemp OB/GYN 1986;32:109-119
21. Revah A, Ezra Y, Farine D, et al: Failed trial of vacuum or forceps: Maternal and fetal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;176:200-204
22. Combs CA, Robertson PA, Laros RK: Risk factors for third and fourth-degree perineal lacerations in forceps and vacuum deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;163:100-104
23. Hayashi RH: Midforceps delivery: Yes? Clin Obstet Gynecol 1987;30:90-92