In vivo nickel allergic contact dermatitis: Human model for topical therapeutics

Contact Dermatitis

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 205-208

  Zhai, Hongbo ^a   Chang, Ya Ching ^a   Singh, Malkiat ^a   Maibach, Howard I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD); Biometrics; Medicaments; Nickel sulfate; Patch test; Topical agents

Indexed keywords

NICKEL SULFATE; PROTECT AND RESTORE; TOPICAL AGENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SCREENING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LASER FLOWMETER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NICKEL HYPERSENSITIVITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; SKIN ALLERGY; SKIN BLOOD FLOW; SKIN COLOR; SKIN WATER LOSS; TOPICAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION;

EID: 0033014198     PISSN: 01051873     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06035.x     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Peltonen L. Nickel sensitivity in the general population. Contact Dermatitis 1979: 5: 27-32.
2. Larsson-Stymne B, Widström L. Ear piercing - a cause of nickel allergy in schoolgirls? Contact Dermatitis 1985: 13: 289-293.
3. Memom A A, Molokhia M M, Friedmann P S. The inhibitory effects of topical chelating agents and antioxidants on nickel-induced hypersensitivity reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994: 30: 560-565.
4. Gawkrodger D J, Healy J, Howe A M. The prevention of nickel contact dermatitis. A review of the use of binding agents and barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 257-265.
5. Fullerton A, Menné T. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the effect of barrier gels in nickel contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1995: 32: 100-106.
6. Menné T, Kaaber K. Treatment of pompholyx due to nickel allergy with chelating agents. Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 289-290.
7. Spruit D, Bongaarts P J M, De Jongh G J. Dithiocarbamate therapy for nickel dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1978: 4: 350-358
8. Kaaber K, Menne T, Tjell J C, Veien N. Antabuse® treatment of nickel dermatitis: chelation - a new principle in the treatment of nickel dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1979: 5: 221-228.
9. Man M Q. Feingold K R, Elias P M. Exogenous lipids influence permeability barrier recovery in acetone-treated murine skin. Arch Dermatol 1993: 129: 728-738.
10. Ghadially R, Halkier-Sorensen L, Elias P M. Effects of petrolatum on stratum corneum structure and function. J Am Acad Dermatol 1992: 26: 387-396.
11. Yang L, Man M Q, Taljebini M, Elias P M, Feingold K R. Topical stratum corneum lipids accelerate barrier repair after tape stripping, solvent treatment and some but not all types of detergent treatment. Br J Dermatol 1995: 133: 679-685.
12. Pinski J B. Human dermabrasion as a wound healing model. In: Maibach H I, Lowe N (eds): Models in dermatology. Basel: Karger, 1987: 196-197.
13. Zhai H, Poblete N, Maibach H I. Sodium lauryl sulphate damaged skin in vivo in man: a water barrier repair model. Skin Research and Technology 1998: 4: 24-27.
14. Zhai H, Leow Y-H, Maibach H I. Human barrier recovery after acute acetone perturbation: an irritant dermatitis model. Clin Exp Dermatol 1998: 23: 11-13.
15. Fischer T, Maibach H I. Amount of nickel applied with a standard patch. Contact Dermatitis 1984: 11: 285-287.
16. Frosch P J, Kurte A, Pilz B. Efficacy of skin barrier creams (III). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) in human. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 29: 113-118.
17. Pickart L. Iamin: a human growth factor with multiple healing properties. In: Sorenson JRC (ed): Biology of Copper Complexes. Clifton: Humana Press, 1987: 273-285.
18. Grubauer G, Elias P M, Feingold K R. Transepidermal water loss: the signal for recovery of barrier structure and function. J Lipid Res 1989: 30: 323-333.
19. Pinnagoda J, Tupker R A, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. Contact Dermatitis 1990: 22: 164-178.
20. Berardesca E, Maibach H I. Bioengineering and the patch test. Contact Dermatitis 1988: 18: 3-9.
21. Wilhelm K P, Maibach H I. Skin color reflectance measurement for objective quantification of erythema in human beings. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989: 21: 1306-1308.
22. Wilhelm K P, Surber C, Maibach H I. Quantification of sodium lauryl sulphate dermatitis in man: comparison of four techniques: skin color reflectance, transepidermal water loss, laser Doppler flow measurement and visual scores. Arch Dermatol Res 1989: 281: 293-295.
23. Agner T, Serup J. Sodium lauryl sulphate for irritant patch testing - a dose response study using bioengineering methods for determination for skin irritation. J Invest Dermatol 1990: 95: 543-547.
24. Agner T, Serup J. Skin reactions to irritants assessed by non-invasive bioengineering methods. Contact Dermatitis 1989: 20: 352-359.
25. Agner T. Contact dermatitis. In: Elsner P, Berardesca E, Maibach H I (eds): Bioengineering of the skin: cutaneous blood flow and erythema. Boca Raton, F1: CRC Press, 1995: 65-72.