Trichromatic opponent color classification

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 20, 1999, Pages 3444-3458

  Chichilnisky, E J ^a,b   Wandell, Brian A ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancellation; Color; Cone; Hue; Opponent

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; COLOR VISION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ADAPTATION, OCULAR; COLOR PERCEPTION; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CONES (RETINA); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS;

EID: 0033013549     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(99)00033-4     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ayama M., Ikeda M. Additivity of yellow chromatic valence. Vision Research. 26(5):1986;763-769.
2. Ayama M., Kaiser P., Nakatsue T. Additivity of red chromatic valence. Vision Research. 25(12):1985;1885-1891.
3. Brainard, D. H. (1989). Understanding the illuminant's effect on color appearance. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
4. Buck S.L. Influence of rod signals on hue perception: evidence from successive scotopic contrast. Vision Research. 37(10):1997;1295-1301.
5. Burns S., Elsner A.E., Pokorny J., Smith V.C. The Abney effect: chromaticity coordinates of unique and other constant hues. Vision Research. 24:1984;479-489.
6. Chichilnisky, E.J. (1995). Perceptual measurements of neural computations in color appearance. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
7. Chichilnisky E.J., Wandell B. Seeing gray through the on and off pathways. Visual Neuroscience. 13:1996;591-596.
8. Cicerone C., Krantz D., Larimer J. Opponent-process additivity-III. effect of moderate chromatic adaptation. Vision Research. 15:1975;1125-1135.
9. DeValois R.L., DeValois K.K. A multi-stage color model. Vision Research. 33(8):1993;1053-1065.
10. DeValois R.L., DeValois K.K., Switkes E., Mahon L. Hue scaling of isoluminant and cone-specific lights. Vision Research. 37(7):1997;885-897.
11. Derrington A., Krauskopf J., Lennie P. Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. Journal of Physiology (London). 357:1984;241-265.
12. Derrington A.M., Lennie P. Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. Journal of Physiology (London). 357:1984;219-240.
13. Ejima Y., Takahashi S. Interaction between short- and longer-wavelength cones in hue cancellation codes: nonlinearities of hue and cancellation as a function of stimulus intensity. Vision Research. 25:1985;1911-1922.
14. Elzinga C., de Weert C.M.M. Nonlinear codes for the yellow/blue mechanism. Vision Research. 24:1984;911-922.
15. Fechner, G. (1860). Elemente der Psychophysik. Breilkopf and Harterl, Leipzig.
16. Hering, E. (1878). Zur Lehre von Lichtsinne. Carl Gerold's Sohn, Vienna.
17. Ikeda M., Ayama M. Additivity of opponent chromatic valence. Vision Research. 20:1980;995-999.
18. Ishihara, S. (1977). Tests for colour-blindness. Kanehara Shuppen Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
19. Jameson D., Hurvich L.M. Perceived color and its dependence on focal, surrounding, and preceding stimulus variables. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 49:1959;890-898.
20. Jameson D., Hurvich L.M. Some quantitative aspects of an opponent-colors theory. I. chromatic responses and spectral saturation. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 45:1955;546-552.
21. Knoblauch K., Sirovich L., Wooten B.R. Linearity of hue cancellation in sex-linked dichromacy. Journal of the Optical Society of America [A]. 2(2):1985;136-146.
22. Larimer J., Krantz D., Cicerone C. Opponent-process additivity-I. red/green equilibria. Vision Research. 14:1974;1127-1140.
23. Larimer J., Krantz D., Cicerone C. Opponent process additivity-II. yellow/blue equilibria and non-linear models. Vision Research. 15:1975;723-731.
24. Mausfeld R., Niederee R. An inquiry into relational concepts of colour, based on incremental principles of colour coding for minimal relational stimuli. Perception. 22(4):1993;427-462.
25. Shevell S.K. Color perception under chromatic adaptation: equilibrium yellow and long-wavelength adaptation. Vision Research. 22:1982;279-292.
26. Shevell S.K. The dual role of chromatic backgrounds in color perception. Vision Research. 18:1978;1649-1661.
27. Shevell S.K. Unambiguous evidence for the additive effect in chromatic adaptation. Vision Research. 20:1980;637-639.
28. Shinomori K., Spillmann L., Werner J. S-cone signals to temporal off-channels: possible asymmetrical connections to postreceptoral chromatic mechanisms. Vision Research. 39(1):1998;39-49.
29. Smith V.C., Pokorny J. Spectral sensitivity of the foveal cone photopigments between 400 and 500 nm. Vision Research. 15:1975;161-171.
30. Smith V.C., Pokorny J. Color contrast under controlled chromatic adaptation reveals opponent rectification. Vision Research. 36(19):1996;3087-3105.
31. Stabell B., Stabell U. Chromatic rod-cone interaction during dark adaptation. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 15(11):1998;2809-2815.
32. Stockman A., MacLeod D.I.A., Johnson N.E. Spectral sensitivities of the human cones. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 10(12):1993;2491-2521.
33. Walraven J. Discounting the background-the missing link in the explanation of chromatic induction. Vision Research. 16:1976;289-295.
34. Walraven J., Werner J.S. The invariance of unique white; a possible implication for normalizing cone action spectra. Vision Research. 31(12):1991;2185-2193.
35. Wandell, B. (1995). Foundations of vision. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
36. Watson A. Probability summation over time. Vision Research. 19:1979;515-522.
37. Werner J.S., Walraven J. Effect of chromatic adaptation on the achromatic locus: the role of contrast, luminance and background color. Vision Research. 22(8):1982;929-943.
38. Werner J.S., Wooten B.R. Opponent chromatic mechanisms: relation to photopigments and hue naming. Journal of the Optical Society of America. 69(3):1979;422-434.