Prospects for preservation and restoration of riparian forests in the Sacramento Valley, California, USA

Environmental Management

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 65-75

  Hunter, John C ^a,b   Willett, Karen B ^a   McCoy, Michael C ^a   Quinn, James F ^a   Keller, Kaylene E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Central Valley; Conservation; Floodplains; Geographic information systems; Riparian vegetation

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VEGETATION;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; REFORESTATION;

FORESTRY;

FOREST MANAGEMENT; GIS; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RIPARIAN VEGETATION;

ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FOREST; LAKE; PLANNING; UNITED STATES; VEGETATION;

CALIFORNIA; SACRAMENTO VALLEY; UNITED STATES;

RIPARIA;

EID: 0033010434     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s002679900215     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abel, D. L. (ed.). 1989. Proceedings of the California riparian systems conference: Protection, management, and restoration for the 1990's. General Technical Report PSW-110, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 544 pp.
2. Andrews, W. F. 1972. Soil survey of Yolo County, California. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 152 pp.
3. Beardsley, K., and D. M. Stoms. 1993. Compiling a digital map of areas managed for biodiversity in California. Natural Areas Journal 13:177-190.
4. Begg, E. L. 1968. Soil survey of Glenn County, California. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 198 pp.
5. Belovsky, G. E. 1987. Extinction models and mammalian persistence. Pages 35-37 in M. E. Soule (ed.), Viable populations for conservation. Cambridge University Press, New York, 189 pp.
6. Buckland, J. G. 1987. The history and use of purchase of development rights in the United States. Landscape and Urban Planning 14:237-252.
7. Buer, K., D. Forwalter, M. Kissel, and B. Stohler. 1989. The Middle Sacramento River: Human impacts on physical and ecological processes along a meandering river. Pages 22-32 in Proceedings of the California riparian systems conference: Protection, management, and restoration for the 1990s. General Technical Report PSW-110, Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
8. CDFFP (California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection). 1988. California's forests and rangelands: Growing conflict over changing uses. Forest and Rangeland Resources Assessment Program, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, 348 pp.
9. CDFG (California Department of Fish and Game). 1995. California Natural Diversity Database. Natural Heritage Division, California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
10. Charbonneau, R., and G. M. Kondolf. 1993. Land use change in California, USA: Nonpoint source water quality impacts. Environmental Management 17:453-460.
11. Conard, S. G., R. L. MacDonald, and R. F. Holland. 1980. Riparian vegetation and flora of the Sacramento Valley. Pages 47-55 in A. Sands (ed.), Riparian forests in California; their ecology and conservation. Institute of Ecology Publication No. 15. University of California, Davis.
12. Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. OBS 79/31, Biological Services Program, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC, 78 pp.
13. Daniels, T. L. 1991. The purchase of development rights: Preserving agricultural land and open space. Journal of the American Planning Association 57:421-431.
14. Davis, F. W., P. A. Stine, D. M. Stoms, M. I. Borchert, and A. D. Hollander. 1995. GAP analysis of the actual vegetation of California I. The southwestern region. Madroño 42:40-78.
15. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1997. River reach file version 3.0-alpha. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
16. Friedman, J. M., M. L. Scott, and W. M. Lewis. 1995. Restoration of riparian forest using irrigation, artificial disturbance, and natural seedfall. Environmental Management 19:547-557.
17. Gaines, D. A., and S. A. Laymon. 1984. Decline, status, and preservation of the yellow-billed cuckoo in California. Western Birds 15:49-80.
18. Goldwasser, S. D., D. A. Gaines, and S. R. Wilbur. 1980. The least Bell's vireo: A de facto endangered race. American Birds 34:742-745.
19. Gowans, K. D. 1967. Soil survey of Tehama County, California. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 32 pp.
20. Harradine, F. 1945. Relationship between soils, topography, vegetation, and land use across the northern Sacramento Valley of California. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 10:356-359.
21. Herbert, F. W., and E. L. Begg. 1969. Soils of the Yuba Area, California. County of Yuba, Marysville, California, 170 pp.
22. Hickman, J. C. (ed.). 1993. The Jepson manual: Higher plants of California. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1400 pp.
23. Jepson, W. L. 1893. The riparian botany of the lower Sacramento. Erythea 1:238-246.
24. Johnson, W. C. 1994. Woodland expansion in the Platte River, Nebraska: Patterns and causes. Ecological Monographs 64:45-84.
25. Johnson, W. C., R. L. Burgess, and W. R. Keammerer. 1976. Forest overstory vegetation and environment on the Missouri River floodplain in North Dakota. Ecological Monographs 46:59-84.
26. Jones & Stokes Associates. 1992. Reassembling the pieces: A strategy for maintaining biological diversity in California. Jones & Stokes Associates, Sacramento. Prepared for California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
27. Kahrl, W. L. 1979. The California water atlas. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, 118 pp.
28. Katibah, E. F., N. E. Nedeff, and K. J. Dummer. 1980. Areal and linear extent of riparian vegetation in the Central Valley of California. Prepared for California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento.
29. Katibah, E. F., K. J. Dummer, and N. E. Nedeff. 1984. Current condition of riparian resources in the Central Valley of California. Pages 314-321 in R. E. Warner and K. M. Hendrix (eds.), California riparian systems: Ecology, conservation and productive management. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1035 pp.
30. Kelley, R. L. 1989. Battling the inland sea: American political culture, public policy and the Sacramento Valley, 1850-1986. University of California Press, Berkeley, 395 pp.
31. Klopatek, J. M., R. J. Olsen, C. J. Emerson, and J. L. Jones. 1979. Land-use conflicts with natural vegetation in the United States. Environmental Conservation 6:191-199.
32. Lytle, D. J. 1988. Soil survey of Sutter County, California. Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
33. Mayer, K., and W. Landenslayer. 1988. A guide to the wildlife habitats of California. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento, 166 pp.
34. McElhiney, M. A. 1992. Soil Survey of San Joaquin County, California. Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 480 pp.
35. McGill, R. R. 1979. Land use changes in the Sacramento River riparian zone, Redding to Colusa. An update: 1972-1977. California Department of Water Resources, Sacramento, 34 pp.
36. Meyer, W. B., and B. L. Turner (eds.). 1994. Changes in land use and land cover: A global perspective. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Melbourne, 537 pp.
37. Mount, J. F. 1995. California rivers and streams, the conflict between fluvial process and land use. University of California Press, Berkeley, 376 pp.
38. Noss, R. F., E. T. LaRoe, and J. M. Scott. 1994. Endangered ecosystems of the United States: A preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. Biological Report No. 28, US Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.
39. NRC (National Research Council). 1991. Restoration of aquatic ecosystems: Science, technology and public policy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 552 pp.
40. Pacific Meridian Resources. 1994. California hardwood rangeland monitoring report. Pacific Meridian Resources, Sacramento. Prepared for Strategic Planning Program, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Sacramento.
41. Parker, I., and W. Matayas. 1979. Calveg: A classification of California vegetation. Pacific Southwest Region, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, San Francisco, 159 pp.
42. Primack, R. B. 1993. Essentials of conservation biology. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 564 pp.
43. Reed, P. S. 1993. California STATSGO certification. Soil Conservation Service, US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
44. Reiner, R. 1996. The Cosumnes River Preserve: 1987-95 fertile ground for new conservation ideas. Fremontia 24(1):16-19.
45. Sands, A. (ed). 1977. Riparian forests in California: Their ecology and conservation. Institute of Ecology Publication 15. University of California, Davis, 122 pp.
46. Saunders, D. A., R. J. Hobbs, and C. R. Margules. 1991. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conservation Biology 5:18-32.
47. Sawyer, J., and T. Keeler-Wolf. 1995. A manual of California vegetation. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, 471 pp.
48. Shafer, C. L. 1995. Values and shortcomings of small reserves. Bioscience 45:80-88.
49. Skinner, M. W., and B. M. Pavlik. 1994. California Native Plant Society's inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, 338 pp.
50. SNEP (Sierra Nevada Ecosystem Project) Science Team. 1996. Status of the Sierra Nevada: Sierra Nevada ecosystem project final report to Congress. Reagents of the University of California, Berkeley, 2835 pp.
51. Teale Data Center. 1994. Urbanized areas digitized data from 1992 TIGER files. Teale GIS Technology Center, Sacramento.
52. Thompson, K. 1961. Riparian forests of the Sacramento Valley, California. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 51:294-315.
53. Tugel, A. J. 1993. Soil survey of Sacramento County, California. Soil Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, 399 pp.
54. USDOI (US Department of the Interior). 1994. The impact of federal programs on wetlands. A report to Congress prepared by the Department of the Interior, Washington, DC, 333 pp.
55. USFWS (US Fish and Wildlife Service). 1994. National wetlands inventory digital data files. National wetlands Inventory. US Fish and Wildlife Service, St. Petersburg, Florida.
56. USGS (US Geological Survey). 1986. Land use land cover digital data from 1:250,000- and 1:100,000-scale maps, data user guide 4. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
57. USGS (US Geological Survey). 1991. The national aerial photography project. US Geological Survey. Department of the Interior. Reston, Virginia.
58. Warner, R. E., and K. M. Hendrix (eds.). 1984. California riparian systems: Ecology, conservation and productive management. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1035 pp.
59. Warner, R. E., and K. M. Hendrix. 1985. Riparian resources of the Central Valley and California desert. California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento, 285 pp.
60. Wyant, J. G., R. A. Meganck, and S. H. Ham. 1995. A planning and decision-making framework for ecological restoration. Environmental Management 19:789-796.