Development of an attitudes toward health care teams scale

Evaluation and the Health Professions

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 123-142

  Heinemann, Gloria D ^a   Schmitt, Madeline H ^a   Farrell, Michael P ^a   Brallier, Sara A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING SCALE; TEAMWORK;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE TEAM; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0033009429     PISSN: 01632787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/01632789922034202     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Baggs, J. G. (1993). Two instruments to measure interdisciplinary bioethical decision making. Heart and Lung, 22, 542-547.
2. Baggs, J. G. (1994). Development of an instrument to measure collaboration and satisfaction about care decisions. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 20, 176-182.
3. Baldwin, D. C., Jr. (1996). Some historical notes on interdisciplinary and interprofessional education and practice in health care in the U.S.A. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 10, 173-187.
4. Berger, E. C. (1990). Doctor-nurse game revisited [letter to the editor]. New England Journal of Medicine, 323(3), 202.
5. Clutter, J. E., & Sachs, L. A. (1990). Attitudes about interdisciplinary health care teams and interdisciplinary health care education. In J. R. Snyder (Ed.), Interdisciplinary health care teams: Proceedings of the twelfth annual conference (pp. 244-251). Indianapolis: Division of Allied Health Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Medical Center.
6. Doughty, R. A., Williams, P. D., & Seashore, C. N. (1991). Chief resident training: Developing leadership skills for future medical leaders. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 145, 639-642.
7. Ducanis, A. J, & Golin, A. K. (1979). The interdisciplinary health care team: A handbook. Germantown, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation.
8. Farrell, M. P., Heinemann, G. D., & Schmitt, M. H. (1986). Informal roles, rituals, and styles of humor in interdisciplinary health care teams: Their relationship to stages of group development. International Journal of Small Group Research, 2, 143-162.
9. Farrell, M. P., Schmitt, M. H., & Heinemann, G. D. (1988). Organizational environments of health care teams: Impact on team development and implications for consultation. International Journal of Small Group Research, 4, 31-53.
10. Farrell, M. P., Schmitt, M. H., & Heinemann, G. D. (1998). Psychometric evaluation of the Team Anomie Scale: An indicator of ambiguity in mission, roles, and process in health care teams. Manuscript in preparation.
11. Feiger, S. M., & Schmitt, M. H. (1979). Collegiality in interdisciplinary health teams: Its measurement and its effects. Social Science and Medicine, 13A, 217-229.
12. Fisher, P. E. ( 1990). Doctor-nurse game revisited [letter to the editor]. New England Journal of Medicine, 323(3), 201-202.
13. Gianakos, D. (1997). Physicians, nurses and collegiality. Nursing Outlook, 45, 57-58.
14. Heinemann, G. D., Schmitt, M. H., & Farrell, M. P. (1994). The quality of geriatric team functioning: Model and methodology. In J. R. Snyder (Ed.), Interdisciplinary health care teams: Proceedings of the sixteenth annual conference (pp. 77-91). Indianapolis: Indiana University School of Medicine.
15. Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-385.
16. Shortell, S. M., Rousseau, D. M., Gillies, R. R., Devers, K. J., & Simons, T. L. (1991). Organizational assessment in intensive care units (ICUs): Construct development, reliability, and validity of the ICU Nurse-Physician Questionnaire. Medical Care, 29, 709-726.
17. Shortell, S. M., Zimmerman, J. E., Gillies, R. R, Duffy, J., Devers, K. J., Rousseau, D. M., & Knaus, W. A. (1992). Continuously improving patient care: Practical lessons and an assessment tool from the National ICU Study. Quality Review Bulletin, 18, 150-155.
18. -Slocumb, E. M., & Cole, F. L. (1991). A practical approach to content validation. Journal of Applied Nursing Research, 4, 192-195.
19. Tsukuda, R. A. (1990). Interdisciplinary collaboration: Teamwork in geriatrics. In C. K. Cassel, D. E. Riesenberg, L. B. Sorensen, & J. R. Walsh (Eds.), Geriatric medicine (2nd ed., pp. 668-675). New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
20. Weiss, S. J., & Davis, H. P. (1985). Validity and reliability of the Collaborative Practice Scales. Nursing Research, 34, 299-305.
21. Williams, C. B. (1992). Everybody wants to play doctor. Medical Economics, 69, 37, 39, 42.
22. Williams, T. F. (1986). Geriatrics: The fruition of the clinician reconsidered. The Gerontologist, 26, 345-349.
23. Zeiss, A. M., & Steffen, A. M. (1996). Interdisciplinary health care teams: The basic unit of geriatric care. In L. L. Carstensen, B. A. Edelstein, & L. Dornbrand (Eds.), The practical handbook of clinical gerontology (pp. 423-450). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Zeller, R. A., & Carmines, E. G. (1980). Measurement in the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.