The beneficial influence of prior knowledge on the quantitation of in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 242-246

  Cavassila, Sophie ^a   Deval, Sebastien ^a   Huegen, Christine ^b   Van Ormondt, Dirk ^b   Graveron Demilly, Danielle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cramer Rao theory; Error estimation; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Prior knowledge; Time domain quantitation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CALCULATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE DIAGNOSIS; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

EID: 0033008268     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00004424-199903000-00015     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. de Beer R, van Ormondt D. Analysis of NMR data using time domain fitting. In: Diehl P, Fluck E, Gunther H, Kosfeld R, Seeling J, eds. NMR Basic Principle and Progress. Berlin, Springer-Verlag; 1992: 202-248.
2. van den Boogaart A. Quantitative data analysis of in vivo MRS data sets. Magn Res Chem 1997;35:S146-S152.
3. Diop A, Zaim-Wadghiri Y, Briguet A, Graveron-Demilly D. Improvements of quantitation by using the Cadzow enhancement procedure prior to any linear prediction methods. J Magn Reson 1994;6105: 17-24.
4. Totz J, van den Boogaart A, Van Huffel S, et al. The use of continuous regularization in the automated analysis of MRS time-domain data. J Magn Reson 1997;124:400-409.
5. Chen H, Van Huffel S, van Ormondt D, de Beer R. Parameter estimation with prior knowledge of known signal poles for the quan-titation of NMR data in the time domain. J Magn Reson 1996; A119:225-230.
6. Golub GH, Pereyra V. The differentiation of pseudo-inverses and non-linear least-squares problems whose variables separate. SIAM J Numer Anal 1973;10:413-432.
7. 31P NMR signals using the variable projection method and prior knowledge. Magn Res Med 1988;6:92-98.
8. Vanhamme L, van den Boogaart A, Van Huffel S. Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge. J Magn Reson 1997;129:35-43.
9. van den Bos A. A Cramer-Rao lower bound for complex parameters. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Processing 1994;42:2859.
10. Barkhuijsen H, de Beer R, van Ormondt D. Error theory for time-domain signal analysis with linear prediction and singular value decomposition. J Magn Reson 1986;67:371-375.
11. Cavassila S, Briguet A, Graveron-Demilly D, et al. Quantitation of nondescript peaks with SVD-based methods and estimation of errors. Presented at the 2d Ann. Int. Conf. SMR, San Francisco; 1994:1187.
12. Waterloo Maple Incorporation. Maple V Release 4, Copyright 1981-1996.
13. Cavassila S, Deval S, Huegen C, van Ormondt D, Graveron-Demilly D. Beneficial influence of prior knowledge on quantitation of multiplets. Presented at the 6th Ann. Int. Conf. ISMRM, Sydney; 1998:1843.
14. Cavassila S. PhD thesis. Université Claude Bernard LYON I. 1996.
15. van den Boogaart A, Cavassila S, Vanhamme L, Totz J, Van Hecke P. A complete software package for MR signal processing. Presented at the 18th Ann. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc., Amsterdam; 1996.
16. van den Boogaart A. A User's Guide to the MRUI Software Package, ISBN 90-9010509-3, 1997. See also http://www.mrui.uab.es/mrui/ mruiHomePage.html and http://azur.univ-lyonl.fr/TMR/tmr.html.