Long range interactions between oriented texture elements

Vision Research

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 933-945

  Wolfson, S Sabina ^a   Landy, Michael S ^b  

^a Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Long range interactions; Texture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST; CONTROLLED STUDY; FILTER; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING;

EID: 0033007971     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00144-8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cannon M.W., Fullenkamp S.C. Spatial interactions in apparent contrast: inhibitory effects among grating patterns of different spatial frequencies, spatial positions and orientations. Vision Research. 31:1991;1985-1998.
2. Caputo G. The role of the background: texture segregation and figure-ground segmentation. Vision Research. 36:1996;2815-2826.
3. Chubb C., Landy M.S. Orthogonal distribution analysis: a new approach to the study of texture perception. Landy M.S., Movshon J.A. Computational models of visual processing. 1991;291-301 The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Field D.J., Hayes A., Hess R.F. Contour integration by the human visual system: evidence for a local 'association field'. Vision Research. 33:1993;173-193.
5. He Z.J., Nakayama K. Perceiving textures: beyond filtering. Vision Research. 34:1994;151-162.
6. Kapadia M.K., Ito M., Gilbert C.D., Westheimer G. Improvement in visual sensitivity by changes in local context: parallel studies in human observers and in V1 of alert monkeys. Neuron. 15:1995;843-856.
7. Knierim J.J., Van Essen D.C. Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. Journal of Neurophysiology. 67:1992;961-980.
8. Landy M.S., Bergen J.R. Texture segregation and orientation gradient. Vision Research. 31:1991;679-691.
9. Landy M.S., Cohen Y., Sperling G. HIPS: A UNIX-based image processing system. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing. 25:1984;331-347.
10. Landy M.S., Cohen Y., Sperling G. HIPS: Image processing under UNIX-Software and applications. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers. 16:1984;199-216.
11. Levitt J.B., Lund J.S. Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex. Nature. 387:1997;73-76.
12. Malik J., Perona P. Preattentive texture discrimination with early vision mechanisms. Journal of the Optical Society of America A. 7:1990;923-932.
13. Nothdurft H.C. Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision. Perception and Psychophysics. 52:1992;355-375.
14. Polat U., Sagi D. The architecture of perceptual spatial interactions. Vision Research. 34:1994;73-78.
15. Saarinen J., Levi D.M., Shen B. Integrating of local pattern elements into a global shape in human vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA. 94:1997;8267-8271.
16. Sillito A.M., Grieve K.L., Jones H.E., Cudeiro J., Davis J. Visual cortical mechanisms detecting focal orientation discontinuities. Nature. 378:1995;492-496.
17. Solomon J.A., Sperling G., Chubb C. The lateral inhibition of perceived contrast is indifferent to on-center/off-center segregation, but specific to orientation. Vision Research. 18:1993;2671-2683.
18. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology. 12:1980;97-136.
19. Wolfe J.M. 'Effortless' texture segmentation and 'parallel' visual search are not the same thing. Vision Research. 32:1992;757-763.