Cleft lip and palate treated by presurgical orthopedics, gingivoperiosteoplasty, and lip adhesion (POPLA) compared with previous lip adhesion method: A preliminary study of serial dental casts

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 1630-1644

  Millard, D Ralph ^a,b   Latham, Ralph ^a   Huifen, Xu ^a   Spiro, Scott ^a   Morovic, Carmen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLEFT LIP; CLEFT PALATE; DENTAL RADIOLOGY; DENTURE; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0033006955     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199905000-00009     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Millard, D. R., Jr., and Latham, R. A. Improved primary surgical and dental treatment of clefts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 86: 856, 1990.
2. Millard, D. R., Jr. Embryonic rationale for the primary correction of classical congenital clefts of the lip and palate. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 76: 150, 1994.
3. Millard, D. R., Jr. Cleft Craft, Vol. 3. Boston: Little, Brown, 1980.
4. Latham, R. A. Orthopedic advancement of the cleft maxillary segment: A preliminary report. Cleft Palate J. 17: 227, 1980.
5. Berkowitz, S. A comparison of treatment results in complete bilateral cleft lip and palate using a conservative approach versus Millard/Latham PSOT procedure. Semin. Orthod. 2: 169, 1996.