Allozyme variation in Korean populations of Taxus cuspidata (Taxaceae)

Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 103-110

  Chung, Myong Gi ^a   Oh, Gap Soo ^a   Chung, Jae Min ^a  

^a Gyeongsang National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Allozymes; Genetic differentiation; Genetic diversity; Genetic structure; Taxus cuspidata

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ALLOENZYME; ASIA; CANADA; GENE FLOW; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC DIVERSITY; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; KOREA; OUTCROSSING; POPULATION STRUCTURE; REGENERATION; SEED DISPERSAL; UNITED STATES;

ECOLOGY; ENZYMES; GENES; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PLANTS (BOTANY);

ALLOZYMES; GENETIC DIVERSITY; TAXUS CUSPIDATA;

FORESTRY;

TAXUS CUSPIDATA;

EID: 0033005120     PISSN: 02827581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02827589950152827     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Barton, N. H. & Slatkin, M. 1986. A quasi-equilibrium theory of the distribution of rare alleles in a subdivided population. Heredity 56: 409-415.
2. Brown, A. H. D. 1979. Enzyme polymorphism in plant populations. Theor. Pop. Biol. 15: 1-42.
3. Busing, R. T., Halpern, C. B. & Spies, T. A. 1995. Ecology of Pacific yew (Taxus brevifolia) in western Oregon and Washington. Conserv. Biol. 9: 1199-1207.
4. Chung, M. G. & Kang, S. S. 1994. Genetic variation and population structure in Korean populations of Eurya japonica (Theaceae). Am. J. Bot. 81: 1077-1082.
5. Chung, M. G. & Kang, S. S. 1995. Allozyme diversity and genetic structure in Korean populations of Eurya emarginata (Theaceae). Jpn. J. Genet. 70: 387-398.
6. Chung, M. G. & Kang, S. S. 1996. Genetic variation within and among populations of Camellia japonica (Theaceae) in Korea. Can. J. For. Res. 26: 537-542.
7. Clayton, J. W. & Tretiak, D. N. 1972. Amine citrate buffers for pH control in starch gel electrophoresis. J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 29: 1169-1172.
8. Cook, R. E. 1983. Clonal plant populations. Amer. Sci. 71: 244-253.
9. Crawford, D. J. 1989. Enzyme electrophoresis and plant systematics. In Soltis, D. E. & Soltis, P. S. (eds). Isozymes in Plant Biology, pp. 146-164. Dioscorides, Portland, OR. ISBN 0-931146-13-5.
10. Doede, D. L., Carroll, E., Westfall, R., Miller, R., Kitzmiller, J. H. & Snader, K. M. 1993. Geographic variation in allozymes and taxol, and propagation by rooted cuttings in Pacific yew. In Proceedings of International Yew Resources Conference: Yew Conservation Biology and Interactions, 12-13 Mar., Berkeley, Calif. Native Yew Conservation Council, Berkeley, CA., p. 10.
11. El-Kassaby, Y. A. & Yanchuk, A. D. 1994. Genetic diversity, differentiation, and inbreeding in Pacific yew from British Columbia. J. Hered. 85: 112-117.
12. Gibson, J. P. & Hamrick, J. L. 1991. Genetic diversity and structure in Pinus pungens (Table Mountain pine) populations. Can. J. For. Res. 21: 635-645.
13. Hamrick, J. L., Godt, M. J. W., Murawski, D. A. & Loveless, M. D. 1991. Correlations between species traits and allozyme diversity: implications for conservation biology. In Falk, D. A. & Holsinger, K. E. (eds). Genetics and Conservation of Rare Plants, pp. 75-86. Oxford Univ. Press, New York, NY. ISBN 0-19-506429-1.
14. Hamrick, J. L., Godt, M. J. W. & Sherman-Broyles, S. L. 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New For. 6: 95-124.
15. Hartl, D. L. & Clark, A. G. 1989. Principles of population genetics. 682pp. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. ISBN 0-87893-302-6.
16. Haufler, C. H. 1985. Enzyme variability and modes of evolution in Bommeria (Pteridaceae). Syst. Bot. 10: 92-104.
17. Hedrick, P. W. 1985. Genetics of populations, 629 pp. Jones and Bartlett Publ. Inc., Boston. MA, ISBN 0-86720-011-1
18. Karron, J. D. 1987. A comparison of levels of genetic polymorphism in geographically restricted and widespread plant congeners. Evol. Ecol. 1: 47-58.
19. Kim, J. H. & Hong, S. S. 1991. History of the Korean Butterflies and Origin of the Japanese Endemic Butterflies (the Distribution of the Korean Butterflies). Chiphyunsa, Seoul, Korea. (In Korean.)
20. Kitamura, S. & Murata, G. 1987. Colored illustrations of woody plants of Japan. Vol. II. 545 pp. Hoikusha Publ. Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan. ISBN 4-586-30050-7. (In Japanese.)
21. Kopp, R. 1991. Regeneration dynamics of Taxus baccata in the yew-forest nature reserve at Gottingen. Forstarchiv 62: 188-191. (In German.)
22. Kopp, R. 1992. Inheritance and linkage of some allozymes in Taxus baccata L. Silvae Genet. 41: 342-347.
23. Ledig, F. T. 1986. Heterozygosity, heterosis, and fitness in outcrossing plants. In Soulé, M. E. (ed.). Conservation Biology, pp. 77-104. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. ISBN 0-87893-800-1.
24. Lewandowski, A., Burczyk, J. & Mejnartowicz, L. 1995. Genetic structure of English yew (Taxus baccata L.) in the Wierzchlas Reserve: implications for genetic conservation. For. Ecol. Manag. 73: 221-227.
25. Li, C. C. & Horvitz, D. G. 1953. Some methods of estimating the inbreeding coefficient. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 5: 107-117.
26. Mitton, J. B., Linhart, Y. B., Strugen, K. B. & Hamrick, J. L. 1979. Allozyme polymorphisms detected in mature needle tissue of ponderosa pine. J. Hered. 70: 86-89.
27. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106: 283-292.
28. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 70: 3321-3323.
29. Nei, M. 1977. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Ann. Hum. Genet. 41: 225-233.
30. Rohlf, F. J. 1988. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, 110 pp. Exeter Publ., Setauket, NY.
31. Sarin, Y. K. 1993. Need to conserve Taxus baccata trees. Indian Forester 119: 83.
32. Schiller, G., Conkle, M. T. & Grunwald, C. 1986. Isozyme variation among native stands and populations of aleppo pine in Israel. Israel J. Bot. 35: 161-174.
33. Slatkin, M. 1985. Rare alleles as indicators of gene flow. Evolution (Lawrence, Kans.) 39: 53-65.
34. Soltis, D. E., Haufler, C. H., Darrow, D. C. & Gastony, G. J. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: a compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers, and staining schedules. Am. Fern J. 73: 9-27.
35. Thoma, S. 1995. Genetic differences between four relict yew (Taxus baccata) stands. Forst und Holz 50: 19-24. (In German.)
36. Wahlund, S. 1928. Zusammensetzung von Populationen und Korrelationsersheinungen vom Standpunkt der Vererbungslerhre Ausbetrachtet. Hereditas 11: 65-106.
37. Weeden, N. F. & Wendel, J. F. 1989. Genetics of plant isozymes. In Soltis, D. E. & Soltis, P. S. (eds). Isozymes in Plant Biology, pp. 46-72. Dioscorides. Portland. OR. ISBN 0-931146-13-5.
38. Wendel, J. F. & Parks, C. R. 1985. Genetic diversity and population structure in Camellia japonica E. (Theaceae). Am. J. Bot. 72: 52-65.
39. Wheeler, N. C., Jerk, K., Masters, S., Brobst, S. W., Alvarado, A. B., Hoover, A. J. & Snader, K. M. 1992. Effects of genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors on Taxol content in Taxus brevifolia and related species. J. Nat. Prod. 55: 432-440.
40. Wheeler, N. C., Jech, K. S., Masters, S. A., O'Brien, C. J., Timmons, D. W., Stonecypher, R. W. & Lupkes, A. 1995. Genetic variation and parameter estimates in Taxus brevifolia (Pacific yew). Can. J. For. Res. 25: 1913-1927.
41. Wilson, R. 1990. Pollen production and plant density affect pollination and seed production in Taxus canadensis. Ecology 71: 516-522.
42. Wilson, R. 1991. Variation in sex expression in Canada yew (Taxus canadensis). Am. J. Bot. 78: 569-578.
43. Wilson, R. 1992. The influence of deer browsing on the reproductive biology of Canada yew (Taxus canadensis Marsh.). Oecologia 89: 223-228.
44. Wilson, R. 1996. Reproductive biology of the monoecious clonal shrub Taxus canadensis. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 123: 7-15.
45. Workman, P. L. & Niswander, J. D. 1970. Population studies on southwestern Indian tribes. II. Local genetic differentiation in the Papago. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 22: 24-49.
46. Wright, S. 1922. Coefficients of inbreeding and relationship. Am. Nat. 56: 330-338.
47. Wright, S. 1951. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15: 31-354.
48. Wright, S. 1965. The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution (Lawrence, Kans.) 19: 395-420.